Oceanside expected to pick three hotel finalists
By: ROB O'DELL - Staff Writer | ∞
OCEANSIDE ---- In Oceanside's long search for someone to build a downtown beach resort, Wednesday was supposed to be an exciting day for the city.
The council was expected to have a spirited hearing to pick two finalists from the four developers vying to build a resort hotel on city property across from the Oceanside Municipal Pier.
Instead, the long-awaited hearing is likely to be anticlimactic. City staffers recently recommended that the council eliminate only one developer instead of two, leaving three finalists to undergo a more rigorous examination over the next two months.
City Economic Development Director Jane McVey said Oceanside has always said it would look at the substance of the proposals, and would not just eliminate candidates because that was what was called for in the plans. She said the three finalists are all top-notch candidates and their proposals deserve to be thoroughly examined.
"We said all along that we wouldn't predispose a number (of finalists)," McVey said.
The city's staff is recommending rejecting of the bid from SDC LLC, of La Quinta, and recognizing three finalists: Faulkner USA Properties of Austin, Texas; Pacifica of San Diego; and SD Malkin of San Diego.
In its report, the staff did not give a reason for its recommendation to eliminate SDC from the proposal.
SDC President William Swank said in an interview this week that he may have been too opinionated a developer for the city. He said years of experience with developing hotels have made him quick tell the city what works and what doesn't in the development process. He said he felt that the city wanted a developer that it could control.
"Of course we're disappointed," Swank said. "There is obviously a great opportunity for the city of Oceanside. ... They have got a good site down there. We wish them the best of luck."
Swank said the city is getting bogged down with the details of the project, and should simply choose the developer it wants to design the project.
He said designing and building hotels is a complicated process that needs to be done by a professional team, not by a committee of employees at City Hall.
Swank said the city is not taking into account the money and risk it takes developers to participate in a process like the one Oceanside is going through.
"They have no regard for how much money it costs (developers)," Swank said of the city. "They have three talented firms (left). They should just pick one and let them get on with their work."
McVey said the city is taking a methodical approach to finding a new developer.
"It's just one more step," she said of the Wednesday meeting. "It's one more winnowing (of the candidates)."
If the council approves the three finalists, the city will mail detailed questions to each of the finalists the next day, said Maurice Robinson, a city consultant on the project.
"The questions we keep asking continue to get more and more specific," McVey said.
From there, McVey said, the two developers will have 45 days to prepare and submit their "best and final offer" to the city. If everything goes as planned, McVey said the final offers from the three finalists will be back to the city shortly before Christmas.
After the developers return their proposals to the city, McVey said, "that's when the real analysis starts."
She said the city was likely to take 45 days or more to review the final offers before settling on a developer in late January or early February.
The city has been searching for 20 years for a firm to develop a beach resort to ignite flagging downtown redevelopment. The city's last attempt began in 1997 and deteriorated into dueling lawsuits in August 2003 between the city and the developer, eventually resulting in Oceanside paying Manchester Resorts $2.2 million.
The latest search began this year when the city contacted more than 400 developers about the 2.75-acre site that straddles Mission Avenue downtown. The city received 14 inquiries from developers by the April 2 deadline and approved six as finalists that month.
After two developers dropped out of the process during summer, the four remaining finalists gave presentations on their proposals in early September.
Details of the three finalists recommended by the city staff:
Faulkner's proposal has the 270-room hotel on the southern block and the 26,000 square feet of retail space on the northern block. City officials have asked the developer to replace the office space called for in the project with time shares.
Their architect is Carrier Johnson, which designed the Bridgeworks Hilton hotel in downtown San Diego. Pacifica's project calls for 278 suites and 33,000 square feet of retail space with an angular design with primary colors. It would feature a "view corridor" on the northern block
Robinson said its U-shaped design will help maximize the number of rooms with ocean views, something he said was key for the resort to attract clientele and charge premium room rates.
Contact staff writer Rob O'Dell at (760) 901-4067 or rodell@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement