Encinitas eyes photo radar to nab speeders

By: ADAM KAYE - Staff Writer | Saturday, May 7, 2005 11:18 PM PDT

ENCINITAS ---- The city of Encinitas, which uses cameras to catch red-light runners, is considering similar technology to nab speeders.

"Photo radar enforcement," as the technology is called, weds speed-sensing radar to cameras. Only one California city, San Jose, is known to use the system.

An Encinitas City Council member learned about photo radar during a visit to the Bay Area city and returned with details that enticed her colleagues.

Christy Guerin reported on San Jose's 8-year-old program last month as the City Council prepared to approve its traffic-management program intended to reduce speeds on neighborhood streets.

The Encinitas program favors publicity campaigns, road stripes and signs, and also provides what planners call "treatments" such as speed bumps, landscaping and medians as ways to slow traffic.

Traffic congestion and speeders top the complaints of Encinitas residents.

The council's unanimous approval of the Encinitas Neighborhood Traffic Management Program came with orders that its traffic engineers investigate photo radar.

"If it's something we can do that's effective and less expensive," Councilman Jerome Stocks said, "those are good things."

'Amazing' interest among city leaders

During Guerin's visit to San Jose, she and leaders from two dozen other cities convened for a meeting of the League of California Cities Public Safety Committee.

Photo radar was up for discussion.

"It was amazing how much interest there was" among elected officials, she said.

Bringing photo radar to Encinitas would require the blessing of traffic courts and the San Diego County Sheriff's Department, which polices the city's streets, Guerin said last week.

"We'd have to ask the judges what they'd need to be comfortable (with the technology)," she said.

City staffers already have started to collect information on photo radar and have talked with officials from other jurisdictions who also are interested in the technology, said Peter Cota-Robles, engineering director.

He said it would take at least a year for traffic engineers, the city attorney and Sheriff's Department to develop a photo radar program.

Cheaper than cops

Like red-light cameras, which the city uses at its busiest intersection on El Camino Real at Encinitas Boulevard, an automated, anti-speeding system would be cheaper to employ than a sheriff's deputy.

A recent city estimate placed the annual cost of hiring a deputy in 2009 at $420,000.

"Looking at (photo radar) strictly from a cost perspective, it appears as though it could be an attractive program," Cota-Robles said.

Red-light cameras in Encinitas snap still and moving pictures of vehicles and their drivers. A deputy sheriff later reviews the images to determine whether the law has been broken before mailing a citation to the vehicle's owner.

In San Jose, a city technician is in the van to operate the radar and camera equipment and to visually assess how fast a driver is going. More manpower is needed later to review the evidence and mail notices to speeders.

The nuts and bolts

San Jose's Web site explains the so-called Neighborhood Automated Speed Compliance Program.

Civilian officers park vans marked with the city's seal on neighborhood streets where speed limits are less than 30 mph.

Inside the $150,000 van filled with gear, a radar unit triggers the cameras to photograph vehicles exceeding the speed limit by a "predetermined" amount.

Cameras photograph the driver and the vehicle's license plates.

Because neighborhood residents are most likely to be photographed as speeders, they must sign petitions to ask for radar enforcement on their streets.

City crews post signs informing motorists that speed limits are enforced by photo radar before the photography begins, said Laura Wells of San Jose's Department of Transportation.

"We only go to streets where there's a chronic speeding problem," Wells said. "(Photo radar) is not a moneymaker for the city. It's a service we provide to our neighborhoods."

Contact staff writer Adam Kaye at (760) 943-2312 or akaye@nctimes.com.

Advertisement

5 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

Nancy wrote on Nov 11, 2005 5:49 AM:Stating that,"(Photo radar) is not a moneymaker for the city. It's a service we provide to our neighborhoods", is to say that "Red Light Cameras" are not a revenue generator, and that writing tickets are not a revenue generator. These devices have to be paid for, and after the equipment has been paid, these devices contribute thousand of dollars to the city each year. These forms of "Big Brother" entrapment should be voted upon by the citizens of each city, and not forced upon them. This is just another way for city's to raise revenue to compensate for poor business decisions made by incompetent city council men and women.

Nick wrote on Nov 27, 2005 5:43 PM:This is a great idea. If someone is speeding even after they see a sign stating "photo radar in use" then they should get a ticket. If someone can’t drive 25 in a place where kids play, then they should not be allowed the privilege of driving. Besides Gas prices are high and driving with a led foot won't make your MPG any better.

Sally wrote on Dec 30, 2005 12:16 AM:It's not entrapment, Nancy, if it's clearly posted that a street is being monitored by photo radar. You shouldn't be speeding anyway, and I'm certainly happy for the City to raise revenue as a result of the poor judgement of incompetent men and women drivers. I'm sick of being tailgated when I drive at the posted speed-limit.

Mark wrote on Jan 2, 2006 11:55 AM:Anyone notice that the police officers job has shifted to more of an "armed revenue collector"? You got an insurance claim.. they want to see a police report...lotta paperwork..I guess its much easier just to sit by side of road and just wait for the money faucet to turn on..How bout putting more time in unsolved violent crimes community programs to deter crime etc..If I was to get a ticket I hope to use up as much as their time and resources as possible...Imagine that a life threatening emergency but no one to respond to cause someone is in some office processing tickets and using a stamp...So if someone is breaking into your house to assault you..rest assured that at least there is a speed trap or motorcycle cop hiding out there behind some bushes to collect revenue ..to pay for that 420k officer a year..so they can hire another at same rate to go out and collect more revenue...

Chris wrote on Apr 5, 2006 8:05 PM:How is it cheaper than cops if a cop has to review it after the fact? Seems like a revenue generator to me. Could just stop giving a driver's license to anyone with a pulse in this state.

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, email addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos