Agency to tell voters where it thinks new airport should be built
By: MARK WALKER - Staff Writer | ∞
Travelers grab their luggage after arriving at Lindbergh Field in San Diego on Wednesday. The airport is becoming overcrowded, and a government panel is set to ask voters to approve an expansion or a new airport later this year.
HAYNE PALMOUR IV Staff Photographer
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery
The question of whether San Diego's Lindbergh Field can continue to serve the region's airport needs will land squarely in the lap of county voters before the end of 2006.
The agency that runs the 612-acre, 77-year-old airfield is required by law to come up with a plan to expand the single-runway Lindbergh, build a dual-runway airport somewhere else or pitch a proposal to share or take over a county military base's airport.
"I think people have come around to accept that with the current air traffic and at the rate it is growing that there is a need for a new airport," said Robert Maxwell, an Oceanside resident and one of nine directors of the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority. "People understand that we just can't go on at Lindbergh the way it is. If we do, we are going to seriously constrict air transportation and economic growth of the region."
The authority was created by the state Legislature in 2003 to assume control of Lindbergh from the Unified Port of San Diego and to come up with a recommendation by 2006 that addresses the region's longterm air needs.
The agency started with a list of 32 potential new airport sites and has imposed an April deadline to come up with its recommendation. Whatever a majority of the panel decides will go before county voters in the form of an advisory vote in November.
Where to go
In the last year, the authority has winnowed that list of 32 sites down to a handful.
Expansion of Lindbergh remains a possibility but would face major obstacles, starting with vehement opposition from nearby Point Loma residents. Lindbergh is hemmed in by Interstate 5, the bay and the Marine Corps Recruit Depot, creating a host of problems with the idea of adding a second runway.
Expanding Lindbergh wouldn't solve the problem of not being allowed to have any overnight departures or arrivals, a restriction on Lindbergh because of the nearby residential neighborhoods.
Also still on the list is a site near Campo in the southeastern portion of the county and an Imperial County site just over the San Diego County line off of Interstate 8. Borrego Springs in the far eastern portion of the county is nominally on the list, but is not getting any further study.
Enter the military. After agreeing not to talk about any military sites despite the state legislation that created the authority calling for it to consider military airfields, three county bases are now front and center in the airport search.
Oceanside's Camp Pendleton, North Island Naval Air Station just west of Lindbergh, and Miramar Marine Corps Air Station in northeastern San Diego are now being studied for civilian and shared civilian-military airports.
The authority bowed to political pressure early in 2005 and agreed not to discuss the military bases until the conclusion of a nationwide base realignment and closure process. That process ended this fall with no county base closures.
Now, despite objections from the Marine Corps and Navy, the authority has put the bases in its sights.
Authority board member Mary Sessom said that while the bases must be studied, she doesn't believe a military site is the solution.
"I'm not convinced that we can ever pry a base site away from the military," Sessom said.
Maxwell said that focus groups and others who have targeted Miramar because of its central county location and existing freeway access have a valid point and that a proposal involving a base could emerge.
"The Marines and Navy have made their positions very clear, but we are committed to the bases and we could come up with one or more proposals involving them," Maxwell said.
Planes, trains and automobiles and boats
Pressure for the authority to consider a remote desert site comes primarily from U.S. Rep. Bob Filner, D-San Diego, whose 51st Congressional District includes the largely agricultural and largely undeveloped Imperial County.
Voters in Imperial recently gave overwhelming approval when asked in an advisory vote if they supported a new airport being built in their county, and Filner is pushing a high-speed train powered by magnetic levitation as the way to connect the site to San Diego.
Filner's effort got nearly $1 million through a congressional transportation bill to study a train line between San Diego and Imperial, and the results of that study will go before the authority in February or March when it prepares to cut down its remaining site list.
The congressman argues that the authority needs to be visionary in its thinking because no one wants a new airport built near them and that the military is unwilling to give up its property.
He has appeared before the authority board numerous times to make his case, also suggesting that a high-speed rail line could link San Diego with Arizona and provide a new way to move goods between the city and points east.
The Campo site does not call for linkage via train, but would be more than an hour's drive for a majority of county residents. The area also lacks sufficient water and utility service, requiring a major investment of about $10 billion for those items along with high-speed rail alone, according to a recent authority report.
The cost of a high-speed train and other utilities related to an Imperial County airport is even more, pegged at more than $13 billion in the authority's report.
A North County site?
Sessom has pushed the authority to reconsider sites in North County that could serve as what she calls a "supplemental" airport to Lindbergh. She said she envisions a single, 12,000-foot-long runway that could serve as the airport for international and cargo flights, leaving Lindbergh open as the region's domestic flight air field.
In January, the authority staff is supposed to come up with a list of sites that could be considered as possible supplements to Lindbergh.
Authority officials say that despite a slow recognition among county residents of the need for a new airport, most are coming around to the idea.
The authority says that continued increases in passenger and cargo flights will render Lindbergh at capacity with no room to handle more within about 15 years.
If county voters ultimately give their OK, a new airport would be built with a combination of federal grants and existing airport revenues derived from concessionaire contracts, leases with airlines and a small, existing "passenger facility charge" tacked on to every airline ticket.
No local tax dollars would be necessary for construction of the airport itself, but local taxes would be needed for transportation and utility needs. Although the authority has not put a price tag on construction of a new, dual-runway airport, the cost is generally estimated at about $5 billion. Construction would take years, another reason the airport issue will be on the ballot in 2006.
John Chalker, a San Diego businessman who heads up a group called Alliance in Support or Airport Progress in the 21st Century, said the benefits of a new airport will far outweigh the costs.
"The importance is the economic benefit that a new airport brings to the region and its economy," Chalker said. "The airport at Lindbergh is already constrained and will be more constrained as we go forward, and if we don't meet the demand for air travel and cargo in the region that will negatively impact the economy and the tax base that the county and city rely on."
While his group of San Diego chamber members and business leaders does not have a preferred site, Chalker said it would be likely to line up in support if the authority comes up with a recommendation it agrees with.
"We're coming down to the wire where a tough decision that will affect this region for decades to come needs to be made," he said. "It's very important that we have good, open, factual debate and put personal prejudices aside and do what's best for the region."
In the air
During the next three months, authority staffers and consultants plan to hold a series of meetings with Navy and Marine Corps officials to analyze whether any base can become a shared airfield. That process is expected to include a study of whether a new airport can be built in the eastern section of Miramar Marine Corps Air Base.
That study is expected to be complete by late March, about the same time the study of a high-speed rail connection to Campo and Imperial County will be completed.
In early April, the authority board will take all of that information as well as the renewed look at a possible supplemental site in North County as it further winnows its site list and arrives at a recommendation.
North County residents looking for more information have two opportunities in the next few weeks. A town hall will take place in Oceanside on Thursday, Jan. 12, at a time and location to be announced. A week later on Jan. 19, another town hall will take place at Vista City Hall starting at 6 p.m.
Plenty of other background information is available on the authority's Web site, http://www.san.org. Look for the Airport Site Selection link to that information.
Contact staff writer Mark Walker at (760) 740-3529 or mlwalker@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Charles wrote on Dec 29, 2005 9:56 AM:Why do they continue to refuse to consider Brown Field? It is already owned by the city, and could easily accommodate dual 12,000 foot runways.
Y? wrote on Dec 29, 2005 11:36 AM:Why not conside Oceanside Municipal Airport? Although detractors call it a landing strip, modern aeronautical technology could upgrade it to a bona-fide international hub.
Dave wrote on Dec 29, 2005 3:00 PM:Brown Field was eliminated due to air traffic, environmental, and flight path restrictions. Adding a second runway would require reshaping a large part of Otay Mesa, and Otay Mountain blocks the eastern approaches for commercial airliners.
Mike wrote on Dec 29, 2005 4:35 PM:I live in Oceanside and have a case (highly infectious I hope) of NIMBY for Camp Pendelton getting the nod. Miramar would be great, Brown Field would be a nightmare. The O'side Muni idea brought a laugh...imagine seeing a 747 land on that little area.
Bill wrote on Dec 29, 2005 7:34 PM:Oceanside would make a great site for an airport and not at the current site, unless that site is enlarged by eminent domain. There are plenty of lands in Oceanside of North San Diego County and it makes sence to releive San Diego City from the load
al wrote on Dec 30, 2005 6:19 PM:The best site got eliminated early in the process, the Naval Communications Station in the salt march area of South Bay. The military mission of that site is movable, not critical at that site. A grading project like Mission Bay would create a win-win for the birds and people, and be centrally located to downtown and major transportation arterials and with no flight path conflicts.
Rodney wrote on Jan 2, 2006 12:03 AM:We are all coming to the same conclusion that technology; not land acquisition is the key to making the right decision in meeting our regional airport needs. After looking at 32 options to replace Lindbergh Field, San Diego is deciding that it wants to keep Lindbergh Field in its current location. People are finding out that Lindbergh Field has always been convenient for the traveling public including business and local people and for the many tourists and the military who all find Lindbergh Field an easy airport to fly into and out-of. Congressman Bob Filner is right in his assessment that a maglev high-speed train must be part of any solution for solving our regional airport needs. Mr. Sandor Shapery a local developer shows the way that a maglev high-speed train can be part of the solution for San Diego’s transportation problems with his San Diego/L.A. Maglev project, which can be found on the web at www.sdlamaglev.org. The goal of any transportation solution for the region is to get people to where they want to go in a convenient and economical way that is safer and develops less noise then the cars and trucks on our highways. The maglev high-speed train meets all of these objectives and is quicker then the airlines from door-to-door for passenger traveling under 300 miles to their destinations. We must start to leverage the major investments already made in the airports that are currently operating throughout Southern California. This should include taking a fresh look at building a cross-border terminal, in Otay Mesa; to allow San Diego to take full advantage of an underutilized Tijuana International Airport located just south of the border in Mexico. There needs to be a proposition placed on the November ballet that would ask “would you support to develop a public-private partnership, to build a maglev high-speed train that would link all our regional airports from a newly built cross-border terminal along the border; an upgraded and expanded Lindbergh Field. These two airports would be linked to regional airports in Orange, Los Angeles and Riverside Counties; all less then 150 miles away and under an hour by maglev high-speed train.” The maglev high-speed trains would allow us to leverage our current infrastructure investments in our Southern California airports allowing them to act as multi-modal transportation centers for the region; without having to build an expensive new airport in some remote location of San Diego or Imperial Counties The maglev high-speed trains would use far less energy then other forms of transportation that would allow us to weather any quantum leap in gas and oil prices. This would go a long way in providing a needed insurance policy for our economy retain strong, robust, and secure if prices head up as everyone expects too happen sooner, not later. We urgently need to begin the process of developing joint mayoral/congressional/private-sector partnerships that will allow San Diego to transform its transportation infrastructure for the needs of the 21st century.
John wrote on Jan 2, 2006 10:33 PM:It's great to dream about all these options but if you can't afford them, what's the point? Even the state of California cannot afford a Maglev train. We need an economically realistic solution that will serve the region for the next 75 years. And remember that you can't force the airlines to fly into any airport just because you built it, so please reconsider those comments about only international flights at a supplemental airport. The airlines are not like Monopoly houses that you place anywhere on the board. They cover a big share of the airport's cost, and if it doesn't make economic sense for them, they will not fly there!! If you don't close Lindbergh Field, who would be the first airline to pick up the higher cost of operating out of a new airport while Southwest stays at Lindbergh because of convenience; no one I would suspect, not for the added benefit of flying a couple of international flights each day. And if Imperial Valley wants an airport that badly, then let them build one on their own; they don't need San Diego's permission.
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement


