ACLU to protest county's marijuana lawsuit
By: GIG CONAUGHTON - Staff Writer | ∞
SAN DIEGO ---- Several groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, plan to demand today that county supervisors drop their legal challenge of California's 9-year-old medical marijuana law.
Kevin Keenan, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego and Imperial Counties, said the groups plan to petition county supervisors to start issuing identification cards and registering medical marijuana users ---- actions county supervisors already defied when ordered by the state.
Keenan said if the supervisors refuse to withdraw their lawsuit, the ACLU would immediately ask federal judges for permission to join the lawsuit as an opponent ---- permission that may or may not be granted.
Officials from the marijuana advocacy group Americans for Safe Access, the Drug Policy Alliance, and local patients who use marijuana as a medicine are also expected to attend today's county board meeting, which begins at 9 a.m. at the County Administration Center in San Diego.
There isn't expected to be much interplay between supervisors and the visiting groups because the issue is not on the board's agenda, meaning supervisors can listen but cannot debate the issue.
On Friday, the county, after a unanimous vote by supervisors in December, filed a precedent-setting lawsuit to overturn California's voter-approved medical marijuana law, Proposition 215, the "Compassionate Use Act."
Supervisors say Prop. 215 should be pre-empted by federal law, which deems all marijuana use illegal and does not recognize the drug as having any medicinal value.
Supervisors have opposed Prop. 215 since it was proposed and passed by voters in 1996. In recent months, they have repeatedly said they just want to settle the contradiction between state and federal law. Prop. 215 legally allows seriously ill Californians to use "obtain and use" marijuana with a doctor's recommendation. But they can still be arrested and prosecuted by federal drug agents.
Marijuana advocacy groups and county officials said Friday that the lawsuit was the first to attempt to overturn any of the voter-approved medical marijuana laws that have been passed in 11 states.
Keenan, meanwhile, said the ACLU was ready to file an "intervention" motion asking to become part of the county lawsuit, to "represent" sick patients who use marijuana as medicine.
The county's lawsuit was filed against the state and Sandra Shewry, director of California's Department of Health Services.
"We will file a motion to intervene and become a party to the lawsuit," Keenan said. "Under the current suit, the county would be represented, and the state would be represented, but there wouldn't be an advocate for the sick and dying people who use medicinal marijuana. And we would make sure that their voices and situations are understood."
Keenan said the ACLU has been following the county's medical marijuana drama with interest, although the group had not testified to the board about it from the time the board publicly decided to sue in December, and when they filed their lawsuit Friday.
The county's lawsuit cites the U.S. Constitution's "Supremacy Clause" ---- Article VI, which states that the constitution and federal law would be the "supreme" law of the land ---- and a 1961 international treaty as its argument that Prop. 215 should be pre-empted.
The "Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs" treaty, signed by the United States and 150 other nations, ruled marijuana illegal.
Keenan, however, said recent case law ---- such as last week's decision to indirectly uphold Oregon's assisted-suicide law ---- illustrate that the county's pre-emption argument is hollow.
"This (county lawsuit) is being done for bad political reasons and not good legal reasons," Keenan said.
John Sansone, the county's top lawyer, disagreed, saying the county believes its pre-emption argument is correct.
"That's why there are courts to decide these issues," Sansone said.
Contact staff writer Gig Conaughton at (760) 739-6696 or gconaughton@nctimes.com. To comment, go to www.nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Jim wrote on Jan 24, 2006 11:29 AM:I will never visit or spend any money in San Diego County. I will boycott any business from SD and have enlisted all family/friends to do so as well.
Ted wrote on Jan 24, 2006 12:29 PM:awwwwww, Jim....don't be so bitter !!! Oh, and by the way, thank you for staying up there in San Francisco with all the other dope smoking liberals. You and the ACLU deserve each other. I'm sure we will survive without you...
Patrick wrote on Jan 24, 2006 12:48 PM:The arrogant San Diego supervisors opposed to term limits yet approving huge raises for themselves are also breaking state law and the California constitution but not upholding the voter approved law. They should be recalled immediately instead of continuing to waste my tax payer dollars for there own moral satisfaction. Time to stop the good old boy network of San Diego supervisors. Vote these zealous idiots out!
Guy wrote on Jan 24, 2006 1:28 PM:Patrick is right on the money. The SD supervisors are arrogant and ARE NOT representing the voters of this community. WE DESERVE BETTER REPRESENTATION!
David wrote on Jan 24, 2006 2:11 PM:The US federal laws supersedes State law. California couldn't pass a law making abortions legal just because the liberals wanted to. The same goes for marijuana. I am not anti-marijuana, I just think that we live in a country where we need to obey the laws. We are no better than other states. "Medical marijuana" is a joke. Anyone that wants a prescription can get one. I know so many people that find some quack to give them a presciption. They are just potheads. I believe in the original reason why the propsition was created. But I knew a lady where the pill form worked just right for her cancer. She didn't need to smoke out daily. All the law is is a loophole hindering fair treatment of everyone. If you want to be a pot smoker go for it, but I think that propostion 215 is illegal in and of itself.
Patrick wrote on Jan 25, 2006 12:28 PM:David, SD Supervisors are STATE elected officials, not FEDERAL, lucky for them! Why are they breaking state law? They took an oath to uphold the California constitution when they were voted in. The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that states cannot be compelled to enforce federal laws. . Why do I vote and pay taxes if these supervisors are not accountable to me as a voter? They are so arrogant and pious they think they are too good for term limits on top of it all, name another county in California that has no county supervisor term limits. I can’t wait to get these guys out into the real world.. no more 25% raises either! What have they done to deserve that?? Bring the supervisors back to reality by voting them out!!
David wrote on Jan 28, 2006 3:43 PM:I agree with Ted. Jim, please do all you can to ensure that you and your friends stay in San Francisco. Please stay there.
Patrick wrote on Jan 31, 2006 4:44 PM:David, please ensure that the county supervisors run your life the way they think it should be run! You obviously can't think for yourself!
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement