Prop. C means cleaner water in Encinitas
By: Maggie Houlihan - Commentary | ∞
In response to increasing regulations and corresponding program costs, after public hearings, the Encinitas City Council adopted in February 2004 a fixed $5.00 per month fee for all property owners in Encinitas. All other cities in the county now collect clean water fees, but Encinitas was the only city targeted by a lawsuit 15 months after adoption of the fee. To avoid wasting valuable resources on litigation, the city entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiff to discontinue collecting the fee and submit the fee to a vote of affected property owners following the mandated California election schedule.
Clean water programs are mandated, but unfunded, by the federal government and the state. Encinitas was one of the first cities in the county to adopt a Clean Water Program in 1999, in response to a legally binding agreement with San Diego BayKeeper. In 2001, the state increased program requirements significantly, resulting in greater costs and improved water quality, with fines up to $10,000 per day per violation for noncompliance.
Many cities throughout the county have already received hefty fines for having poor water quality. This year, stricter regulations will be imposed on cities yet again, resulting in additional capital and operational costs with heavier fines for noncompliance to improve water quality.
Encinitas maintains an extensive storm-drain infrastructure, including hundreds of miles of drainage channels, storm drains and detention basins.
The program costs approximately $3.5 million annually: $1.3 million for operations and $2.2 million for capital projects. Encinitas land owners are being asked to approve a fixed $5 per month assessment for 10 years.
This will generate one-third, or $1.1 million annually, of the revenue needed to support the program. The remaining $2.4 million would continue to come from the city's general fund.
Encinitas enjoys an excellent quality of life and prides itself on well-maintained parks, roads, beaches, trails and natural open space. More than $50 million in revenue is pumped into our economy annually by beach visitors alone. I don't believe anyone wants to return to the days before the city's Clean Water Program was implemented ---- when 100 or more days of closed beaches were the norm. As a result of past investments in our program, beach closures have been reduced to three days or less. We enjoy a much healthier environment that benefits our families, visitors and local businesses. However, increasing mandates require us to do more. Proposition C is being placed on the ballot to generate one-third of the costs of this program.
The city is committed to providing the type of environment and quality of life that Encinitans expect. Our Clean Water Program is a major part of the City's commitment to the community's priorities, but it is not a voluntary effort. I ask you to vote yes on Prop C to ensure the funds necessary to continue to provide the full range of services and amenities Encinitas expect and enjoy.
Maggie Houlihan is an Encinitas City Council member.
Advertisement
Writer wrote on Jan 25, 2006 1:20 PM:Prop. C means more taxes for Encinitas residents. The modest amount allows your elected representative to get their hands into your wallets and pocketbooks. Watch the propositions multiply and the requested amounts increase. What has the city spent its recent property tax windfall on? Shouldn't that have been more than enough to cover the cost of storm drains?
local surfer wrote on Jan 26, 2006 8:08 AM:I don't get the anti-tax crowd on this one. Clean water is good for the city's image, good for the economy, and imperative to our quality of life. Dude, it's $5 per month, and the total raised will only pay for about a third of the program. We're lucky to live here, and should be willing to pay a couple bucks a month to ensure upward trends in water quality continue.
Still green, but not stupid wrote on Jan 26, 2006 9:13 PM:Hey the taxes have just started. State has one in review to make all sewer spills illegal. They project $72 per residence year, but that doesn't include the litigation costs. If passed, cities have to report any spills on the web so that Non-government lawyers can decide which City has deep enough pockets to be worth suing for "legal fees". Some kid pops a manhole, throws in a barrel of trash...ka-ching payday for the sharks.
also a local surfer wrote on Jan 26, 2006 10:38 PM:Maggie's bullet points are reasons why the clean water program needs to be paid out of the general fund. Clean water benefits all of us. If the beaches generate so much revunue for the city then it pays for itself easily. Jp
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement


