Campers say toll road will ruin campground experience
By: PHILIP K. IRELAND - Staff Writer | ∞
SAN ONOFRE ---- Around morning campfires and across picnic tables, campers in San Mateo State Campground pondered the meaning of "life after the toll road" Friday.
For these outdoor enthusiasts, opinions of how a six-lane toll road that would bisect this fifth most popular of 270 state campgrounds were predictably one-sided.
"It's going to ruin this campground," said Carol Campbell, who was out walking her cat Luccy in the chaparral that insulates one campsite from the next. "If nothing else, they'll shut (the campground) down."
Traffic noise will drown the whisper of ravenís wings and the croaking of the arroyo toads, said Larry Smith, who with his wife, helps maintain the campground. Instead of the deep night full of stars, headlights will sweep the campground, he said. Views of concrete pillars and metallic guardrails will replace the mountain views to the north.
Proponents of State Route 241 say the road is needed to relieve traffic congestion on Interstate 5 through Orange County. Some opponents say the road will actually increase San Diego County traffic on Interstate 5 south of San Clemente, where the road will join the freeway.
The Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency is expected next month to approve the final environmental studies and the preferred route for the 16.9-mile road ---- the final link in a 67-mile system of toll roads through Orange County designed to relieve congestion on Interstate 5. The final section would connect CA 241, which now ends in Rancho Santa Margarita, with Interstate 5 just south of San Clemente.
The road would enter San Diego County four miles northeast of San Clemente. In its four-mile run through San Diego County, the toll road would hug the northern border of San Mateo State Campground, coming within a little more than a football field's length of the closest campsite.
Campbell said no effort at mitigation will succeed in shielding the area from traffic noise. The road-building agency has proposed erecting a sound wall to shield campers from traffic noise.
"There is no sound wall they can put up to absorb the noise," said Campbell, who has written her legislators and the governor asking them to oppose the alignment.
Even if the wall does do its job, Smith said, the traffic noise will bounce off the mountainside right back into the campground.
Campbell challenged anyone to sample how the campground will be degraded by experiencing the Canyons RV campground located ---- ironically ---- at the north end of CA 241 where it intersects CA 91.
"It sucks," Campbell said. "Itís $45 a night, you hear just massive traffic, and thatís what it would be like here. You couldnít pay me to go back there."
Added Smith: "I could drive out onto the freeway, put my four-ways (flashers) and get the same experience."
Campbell lamented the loss of another escape from the so-called rat race. Orange County doesnít have many campgrounds, she said, listing Doheny, San Clemente, San Onofre and San Mateo.
"I do this to get away from the hustle and bustle under all these trees," she said raising her arms and spinning around, a smile playing across her face. And she prefers San Mateo to all others, she said, because of its natural beauty, the quiet, the large private sites, and its proximity to the beach.
Campbell, Miller and others in the campground Friday said there must be some other route that does not claim the canyon.
The board of directors for the transportation agency will meet Feb. 19 in Mission Viejo City Hall to consider approval for the final environmental studies and the roadís alignment. The board was scheduled to vote on Jan. 19 but delayed for one month at the request of two members of the governorís cabinet.
The land is owned by the Department of the Navy and is controlled by Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base. The Navy leased the land to the California State Parks department in 1971 when then-Gov. Ronald Reagan and President Richard Nixon dedicated San Onofre State Beach and San Mateo State Campground.
"I firmly believe one of the greatest legacies we can leave to future generations is the heritage of our land," Reagan said in 1971, "but unless we can preserve and protect the unspoiled areas which God has given us, we will have nothing to leave them."
Previous story: http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/01/20/news/coastal/21_50_351_19_06.txt
Contact staff writer Philip K. Ireland at (760) 901-4043 or pireland@nctimes.com. To comment go to www.nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Josh wrote on Jan 29, 2006 12:19 PM:I really hope the agency finds an acceptable route that takes this issue and others into consideration. Southern California governments have been all too careless in protecting natural resources from the onslaught of development.
sz wrote on Jan 29, 2006 2:22 PM:Once again money talks..I've stayed up in that campground many times and the new highway will ruin the atmosphere and camping experience
rb wrote on Jan 29, 2006 4:05 PM:put double decker freeways in the area to slight the traffic. Anyone ever been to portland oregon?
Robert wrote on Jan 29, 2006 5:51 PM:I hope the make the road end in central San Clemente or Mission Viejo. For the campground is the last wild one on the South Coast.
TikiMatt wrote on Jan 30, 2006 9:38 AM:Thank you for the Reagan quote. Did you know that THE man behind opening up federal land, specifically San Onofre, to the public for recreational purposes was a guy by the name of Alphonso Bell Jr. A WWII vet, president of Bell Oil, a member of The House of Representatives, a republican. So here are three republicans, Nixon, Reagan, and Bell, that saw something worth protecting and did something about it. Three men with a vision. Why is it that the TCA is having such a difficult time 'envisioning' alternatives with the same furvor as their vision of ruining 'OUR' state park. Unfortunately, common-sense is not a pre-requisite to sit on the TCA board of directors.
Judy wrote on Feb 1, 2006 2:47 PM:Wild, noise free areas on the southern California coast are nearly gone. The San Mateo State Park must be left intact, find another solution for the traffic!!
gary wrote on Feb 24, 2006 1:53 PM:the san mateo camp ground should have been closed years ago.This village of idiots---mostly drunks, drugies, and permanent residents who do not qualify to live in an apartment are using this ['campground'?] place to party and keep what few good citizens go there, awake most of the night. I have tried more than several times to take my family to San mateo,but found our children subjected to mostly four letter words and the village idiots participating in leud activities.It is not in the budget to have a park ranger after sunset. And the one or two daytime rangers are not doing anything much to stop this anarchy. good riddance to the park and thankyou for the tollroad Orange county supervisors
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement