Study: CSUSM freshmen not catching up as quickly
By: DAVID GARRICK - Staff Writer | ∞
LONG BEACH ---- Freshmen who arrive at Cal State San Marcos without adequate English and math skills don't catch up as quickly as similar students at other campuses in the California State University system, according to data presented Tuesday to trustees.
The San Marcos campus ranks behind 20 of the 23 campuses in the system for remediating unprepared freshmen, according to the data, which was compiled by the system and based on test results from individual campuses.
The data, presented by three system officials during the trustees' monthly meeting in Long Beach, showed Cal State San Marcos ranked ahead of only the Channel Islands and Dominguez Hills campuses.
Of the incoming freshmen who failed proficiency exams in math or English in fall 2004, Cal State San Marcos had managed to remediate 69 percent by fall 2005, according to the data. The systemwide average was 84 percent.
Karen Haynes, president of the San Marcos campus, acknowledged the severity of the situation in an interview. But Haynes said she is confident the campus can solve the problem quickly with extra resources and personnel.
"Within two years I hope to reduce the gap from 15 percent to single digits, maybe even 5 percent," said Haynes. "We will have more student support, more outreach and more targeted efforts for these students."
Haynes blamed the problem on budget cuts in 2003 and 2004 that hit student support programs hard, and on the growing number of freshmen on the 7,600-student campus.
"The budget cuts we made in recent years seem to have impacted student affairs more than other things," said Haynes.
"Now that we are becoming a more traditional campus with more freshmen, we need to focus on this aggressively," said Matt Ceppi, director of institutional planning and analysis for the San Marcos campus.
The size of the university's freshman class has remained in the 700 to 900 range since fall 2002 due to budget cuts, but it increased last fall from 726 to 817 students and is expected to increase even more in fall 2006, according to Darren Bush, associate vice president for enrollment management services.
Previously, a greater percentage of students on the campus were junior transfers from community colleges, Haynes said.
"This shift has played a big role because transfer students have already been successful at a community college," said Haynes.
Ceppi said that community college transfers do not take the proficiency exams when they arrive.
He also said that fixing this problem was one of the main reasons Haynes hired him last fall.
"We have been examining the programs we have in place and deciding where to apply additional resources, whether that is money or people or grants or fundraising," said Ceppi.
The programs currently in place are Student Support Services, the Educational Opportunity Program, the College Assistance Migrant Project, the Mathematics Acceleration Program and the General Education Learning project, said Ceppi.
The campus also has a writing lab, which non-proficient students must attend nine times in their freshman year, and an English lab, he said.
Gary Reichard, chief academic officer for the university system in Long Beach, said his office is exploring which campuses have had the most success remediating unprepared freshmen to isolate some best practices that can be adopted at struggling campuses.
"It may be that some campuses are delivering student support more effectively than others," said Reichard.
Ceppi said that such assistance would "most certainly" be welcome.
This problem is nothing new at Cal State San Marcos, Ceppi said, but it became more severe in the 2004-05 school year covered by Tuesday's data.
The freshman remediation rate for Cal State San Marcos increased from 62.5 percent in 2001-02 to 70.5 percent in 2002-03 and 72 percent in 2003-04. But the rate dropped back down to 69 percent for 2004-05.
Meanwhile, the systemwide average has steadily climbed from 79 percent in 2001-02 to 84 percent in 2004-05, said Ceppi.
"It is a problem that the rest of the system went up, and we went down," said Ceppi.
The percentage of freshmen at Cal State San Marcos needing to become proficient in fall 2004 was 63 percent, compared with 57 percent systemwide.
But system officials said that such differences do not explain the varying success in remediation efforts, because campuses are judged only on how they succeed with their unprepared students, not the performance of their student body at large.
The new freshman remediation data are part of a comprehensive report on remediation efforts.
The report also indicated that the percentage of freshmen who passed the proficiency exams increased from 43 percent in fall 2004 to 45 percent in fall 2005.
Trustees said they were pleased by the increase, but noted that the numbers fall dramatically short of the 90 percent goal set back in 1996.
"Obviously these figures are lower than we would hope if we want to achieve our 90 percent goal by 2007," said Reichard. "But we think the numbers will be much better in two years."
Building partnerships with public school districts across the state is how system officials plan to boost the numbers, he said.
Reichard also said that California has the highest proficiency standards of any state in the nation, and that the number of students in the system who speak English as a second language has steadily increased in recent years.
Contact staff writer David Garrick at (760) 761-4410 or dgarrick@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Proud American wrote on Mar 15, 2006 1:49 AM:"Freshmen who arrive at Cal State San Marcos without adequate English and math skills." This statement in the story is absolutely misleading. A poor choice of words. The students don't just 'arrive' to CSUSM, they are accepted. And therein lies the problem. College is supposed to be higher education, so why are the standards for it being lowered? My guess is so as to fill quotas, or to 'reach out' to the 'diverse' community it serves. But how is the college serving the community (or its freshman students) by admitting them when they do not have "...adequate English and math skills."?I am sure it has to do with money and with the fact that the campus wants to appear socially progressive to those who would attend it. But appearances are not what they are cracked up to be. I repeat, college is supposed to be about higher learning, NOT educational catch-up time because the freshmen students do not posses adequate English and math skills. What is the solution to this problem? This is what the president of CSUSM said: "Karen Haynes, president of the San Marcos campus, acknowledged the severity of the situation in an interview. But Haynes said she is confident the campus can solve the problem quickly with extra resources and personnel." Here's a question for Karen Haynes: If money were they solution to this problem, then why wasn't this problem solved long before these freshman students arrived to CSUSM? Aren't the schools spending more money than ever? So if more money is the solution, why does the problem of failed proficiency exams in math or English persist amongst the freshman students who are admitted? Why not insist upon (and enforce) academic standards? Oh wait. I know why. It would be 'intolerant' to do so, right? Not Politically Correct? (How about politically expedient as well?)In the meantime, we have students who are back-tracking in education because they were admitted without passing proficiency exams: "The report also indicated that the percentage of freshmen who passed the proficiency exams increased from 43 percent in fall 2004 to 45 percent in fall 2005." Big whoop-de-do! Wow, this indicates that 55 percent of those taking the exam are not passing. How many are actually nevertheless admitted to the college? "Building partnerships with public school districts across the state is how system officials plan to boost the numbers." Hey! Here is a novel idea: How about building standards, and adhering to them? Partnerships which deal in student mediocrity (no matter how wonderfully organized or politically appeasing) still deal with mediocrity. Language barriers are to be expected if the student is a foreign exchange student. Am I to believe that all of the 817 incoming freshmen are foreign exchange students? I don't think so. So what is the problem? What is the underlying factor here? I believe it is the failure of institutions of higher learning to insistent and adhere to standards in English and Math requirements. After all, what would it look like if everyone in lower education who failed to meet the standards were actually held back?: #1: There would not be enough room nor educators to facilitate them. #2: Certain liberal Latino activists groups would file lawsuits claiming discrimination and racism. When, oh when, are our systems of higher education going to insist upon academic standards instead of trying to appease anyone and everyone in the name of diversity and Political Correctness? Will the president of CSUSM take the (now radical) position of actually turning away students who do not pass the proficiency exams in math or English because of STANDARDS? I don't believe it will happen. Politics has seeped into the crevices created in the foundations of higher learning, which themselves were created by virtue of the fact the complacency and mediocrity have become acceptable traits among both student and faculty alike. If more money is the solution, why is this problem not solved yet? Give us a dollar amount needed, and then go at it. I'll bet my soul you could have all the money you little political heart desires and still not solve the problem because the underlying issues would have remained untouched! (That being the fact the academic requirements and standards have gone out the window in the name of compassion, diversity, and Political Correctness.) I fear for the future of this country. (And I am disgusted with the academic leaders who continue to wax poetic meaningless and ineffective diatribes in their ivory towers overlooking the halls of our so-called modern higher education faculties.)
Horace wrote on Mar 15, 2006 2:34 AM:Illegal aliens- CSUSM has a higher proportion than other state college campuses, so it requires more resources to bring them up to speed. Is it any surprise that illegal immigration continues unabated? We should bill the government of Mexico for all the free services we provide to Mexican illegal immigrants. In the alternative, we should move the border south over 20 years until we have absorbed Mexico. It is apparent that the Mexican government care more for mordida than for the welfare of its residents.
DW wrote on Mar 15, 2006 8:10 AM:CSUSM is a joke compared to other state colleges. They are so concerned about multi-cultural awareness that they forget about standards, etc. White males are the devil in the eyes of most professors there. Maybe if they start accepting students based on gpa instead of simply being a majority (hispanics aren't minorities) that they wouldn't have to catch students up. Wake up America our society is getting dummied down by political correctness!
Bogus wrote on Mar 15, 2006 8:22 AM:This number will not improve because of the quota system. Can we just admit students on the merit system only? Where is the merit equality? Non Latinos descent students are on the short end of the stick.
Educated wrote on Mar 15, 2006 8:42 AM:It is clear how people only speak out of hate and ignorance. For your information, "illegal aliens" are not eligible for any "free" services in this country. Come on, I thouhg you knew better. we are talking about academics and not an immigration. Reality is that the academic standards in K-12 are failling. For your information, undocumented students who want to continue with their higher education are not eligible for any federal or state aid. They have to pay for their education our of their own pockets. They are not getting anything free, just like any other foreign student, they are paying for their education.
not surpised wrote on Mar 15, 2006 9:02 AM:FYI undocumented students do not qualify for financial aid. they have to pay for all of their expenses. so Horace, you are ignorant!
Ron wrote on Mar 15, 2006 9:03 AM:Why is anyone surprised by this? Thye talk of budget cuts, I defy any one to show me a single year where the budget was actually cut. Never happened. This is the same old lie told, over and over again. If money were the reason for kids failing, then I'd say, sure, let's increase. But the facts are, even if you increased teacher pay, and school district budgets tomorrow, these kids would not learn any faster, or better. Not to mention the curriculum being taught. These kids are more informed about contraceptives, and recycling than their own language. And you can't get rid of poort teachers. Several years ago in Vista (VUSD), we had a kindergarten teacher who was an internet predator. He was caught in an Oceanside motel, attempting to meet with a 14 yr. old girl. She was actually a FOX new reporter, and brought in the cops. He was put on administative leave pending action by the school board. He was eventually let go, but the fact that he was caught in the act should have been grounds for immediate firing. Instead, because of his union rights, he had to have hearings, and we paid until they were completed. What chance do you think you have with a poor teacher versus their tenure? None. You can't test them, they own the school boards. It's an absolute disgrace. And any one who wants to defend this should be ashamed. They will, instead, blame parents.
College Grad wrote on Mar 15, 2006 10:41 AM:Not proficient = not accepted, no matter who you are, green, purple or yellow. Go to community college, become proficient, and stop wasting time and money at the institutions of higher learning. Those schools should be teaching new and fresh concepts, not the basics. CSUSM will never attract a higher caliber of student so long as these problems exist.
Linda N. wrote on Mar 15, 2006 11:07 AM:Posted 3/15 11:01am. Don't you just love the happy talk that professional educators greet any bad news about their performance? "But Haynes said she is confident the campus can solve the problem quickly with extra resources and personnel." Get that -- if they have more money and more staff [who don't work for free, so that's more money, too], they can fix the problem. And more to the point, no high school that sent unprepared students or college-level instructor will face a moment's worry about their job security for the obvious failure to teach. These are the same folks who tried to get American History removed from the Palomar JC AA degree. Dumb, dumber and dumbest. And they keep on burbling out happy talk and "improvements" and pity talk about "disadvantaged, at-risk youth" and demanding more money.
Linda N. wrote on Mar 15, 2006 11:25 AM:Posted 3/15 11:11am. For those who think that we are talking about academics, not immigration, you are wrong. No matter what we are talking about in CA [with between 2 & 4 million illegals], we are REALLY talking about immigration. Consider this, education takes over half of our states $100+billion budget. 47% of our K-12 schools are hispanic and the Pew Hispanic Center research shows that 80% of the Hispanics in our nation are here illegally. The 2000 Census shows that for the first time in our state's history more citizens left the state than moved here from other states... and that our population grew by 4 million [at present rates, it will grow by 6 million in the next decade]that growth is almost entirely to immigration and births to immigrant mothers. Since illegal immigration is now double legal immigration, the poor performance of our students is due to the massive student population who have significant educational challenges ranging from poverty to frequent moves to no English spoken in their homes.
- OCEANSIDE: Killer may be granted parole (6596)
- RANCHO BERNARDO: Cyclist hit by car was retired Navy captain, avid athlete (5925)
- SOLANA BEACH: Pregnant woman, fetus killed in I-5 hit-and-run (5174)
- CHARGERS: Sproles carries Bolts to playoff win over Colts (4342)
- ENCINITAS: Carlsbad has questions about Encinitas shopping center plan (3939)
Advertisement
Videos
Advertisement


