Power line targets Ramona, Anza-Borrego park; avoids Julian
By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | ∞
Supervisor Dianne Jacob shows her support for protesters Monday outside a meeting at the Charles Nunn Performing Arts Center in Ramona where San Diego Gas & Electric Co unveiled the proposed route for it Sunrise Powerlink transmission line.
WADLO NILO Staff Photographer
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery
NORTH COUNTY ---- After months of anxious anticipation and speculation, area residents now know where San Diego Gas & Electric Co. plans to punch its proposed electricity superhighway through San Diego County's mountain and desert backcountry.
View a Movie
Unveiled at community meetings in Rancho Penasquitos and Ramona on Monday, the preferred route for the $1.4 billion Sunrise Powerlink transmission line largely avoids Julian by looping north around the popular resort town.
However, the path for the project's giant, 160-foot "erector-set-like" poles slices through Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, Ramona, Poway, Scripps Ranch, Rancho Penasquitos and Carmel Valley. There are alternate routes in the state park and Ramona area and the utility says it will refine the alignment by summer.
SDG&E is proposing to build a big substation at either Warner Springs, at the intersection of Highway 79 and S-2, or along Highway 78 about three miles west of Santa Ysabel. To the east of the substation, thick, buzzing wires would sizzle with 500 kilovolts. To the west, 230-kilovolt lines would arc through wilderness and communities.
The utility says the line would deliver 1,000 megawatts to San Diego County, one-fourth of the record total the region used one day last summer. A megawatt is the standard measuring unit for electricity. It is roughly what it takes to keep the lights on in 750 to 1,000 homes, according to the California Independent System Operator, which oversees the state's electric grid.
Communities and environmental groups immediately denounced the route, saying it would exact a terrible toll on neighborhoods and wildlife.
"SDG&E's preferred Powerlink route confirms conservationists' and communities' worst fears for impacts to nature and people," said David Hogan, urban wildlands program director for the Center for Biological Diversity in San Diego. "SDG&E cynically selected the path of least resistance through the heart of the last best natural landscapes in the county."
At the Ramona meeting Monday evening, however, the electric company encountered plenty of resistance.
With a raised voice from the back row of the Charles Nunn Performing Arts Center, Dan Hutchison of Mesa Grande pointed his finger at SDG&E officials and asked, "Why is it that we have to put up with your towers and your electromagnetic fields for your power? ... We have pristine, beautiful, gorgeous country back here, and you want to run a power line right through it."
Hutchison, a retired math teacher, said it was unsettling to see that the alternate site for a proposed substation in the Warner Springs area fell on his ranch.
Ken Wright of Julian suggested that the line would be particularly shocking to California's largest state park.
"We have a treasure to the east of us which is irreplaceable," Wright said.
SDG&E officials maintained, however, that they have come up with a plan to tread lightly on the land. And they said they would not have to purchase any homes or relocate families to clear a path for the wires.
Utility spokeswoman Stephanie Donovan said the electric company plans to follow corridors of existing lines, albeit much smaller ones, for much of the route, and to put wires under ground in places to avoid neighborhoods. She said wires would be buried for about seven of the route's 120 miles.
Lynn Trexel, principal land adviser for SDG&E, said five of those underground miles would be in the Ramona area, along the north side of San Diego Country Estates and under Creelman Lane. Trexel said an additional two miles would be buried in Rancho Penasquitos, along Highway 56 between Rancho Penasquitos Boulevard and Park Village Drive.
"We knew it was going to come down our street," said Charles Pate, a retired fleet manager who lives on Creelman Lane.
Living next to a buried line is preferable to one overhead, Pate said, but he still has concerns about electromagnetic fields and the impact of construction.
Pate was among about 200 people who attended the Ramona meeting, which was preceeded by a protest rally in the chilly wind outside.
The rally was punctuated with a short speech by San Diego County Supervisor Dianne Jacob, who represents the Ramona area, and the playing of a folk song that Kathleen Beck of Julian wrote for the occasion.
Accompanied by husband Jim Lydick on guitar and Celia Lawley on violin, she sang, "You want to put your wires in my sky, I can't help but wonder why. Ain't no reason I can find, that will satisfy my mind."
Cy Conrad, a retired physician who lives in Ranchita, said he couldn't help but wonder why the entire length of the line couldn't be buried.
But David Geier, SDG&E vice president of electric transmission, said that while 230-kilovolt lines can be placed in the ground, 500-kilovolt wires can't. Geier said the larger wires are more efficient than smaller ones at transporting power over long distances, and burying a line costs five to 10 times more than stringing one from a pole.
The proposed line would begin at the Imperial Valley Substation south of Interstate 8 in Imperial County and terminate at the Penasquitos Substation southeast of Interstate 5 and Highway 56.
"There are mitigations from beginning to end, in almost every section of the line," said Jim Avery, vice president of SDG&E's electric operations.
Donovan said the utility, however, has not determined how many residential properties the line would cross in its meandering trek from desert to sea.
SDG&E, which powers 1.2 million homes and 100,000 businesses in San Diego County and southern Orange County, is seeking the green light from the California Public Utilities Commission to begin building the project in 2008 and bring it online by 2010.
SDG&E officials maintain that the power line is needed to prevent a forecast shortfall by 2010 and meet a state requirement to provide 20 percent of its power by then from so-called renewable sources, such as wind, solar and geothermal. The utility gets 6 percent now from such sources.
Geothermal technology uses steam from natural underground geysers to produce electricity, and solar panels harness the raw power of the sun.
Conservationists contend there are other ways to boost the region's power supply and increase reliance on renewable sources that don't scar oak-covered mountains and wildflower-carpeted desert canyons. They note that a regional task force a couple of years ago called for half of the region's future renewable energy to be produced within San Diego County.
Conservationists argue that a focus on local plants would negate the need for a transmission line.
Avery disagrees.
"The region needs both," he said. "It needs transmission and it needs generation."
Opponents suggest the transmission is more about opening up markets for the generators SDG&E's parent company built across the border in Mexico.
"The project will promote Sempra Energy's polluting fossil-fuel power pants in Mexico, which in turn contribute to global warming, dodge U.S. air pollution laws and discourage competing renewable energy development," said Kelly Fuller, who is tracking the project for the Sierra Club's San Diego County Chapter.
Conservationists also have criticized the high cost. But Avery said the line would save the utility more than $100 million a year and trigger a rate reduction.
"As soon as it comes on line, it will provide benefits and savings for our customers," he said.
Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 740-5442 or ddowney@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Liz wrote on Mar 21, 2006 1:11 AM:SDGE is not promoting wind, solar and geothermal, but more dependence on polluting sources. Why isn't it seeking approval of plans to produce wind, solar or geothermal energy?
jeff wrote on Mar 21, 2006 6:22 AM:This line will save us money? Like SDG&E/Sempra and their friends at Enron did? SDG+E/Sempra(really one company) once was a reputable company. My father retired many years ago from there. They don't need this power line, it is a setup for some other plan that they are not disclosing.Electromagnetic fields are real, and they are long term killers. It is only to make them money.
Mike wrote on Mar 21, 2006 8:44 AM:I can't help but wonder what it would be like if, instead of spendings millions on this line, we spent that money to install rooftop solar panels on area homes. Our future would be both "greener" and more secure!
Mike wrote on Mar 21, 2006 10:35 AM:All of these ideas sound so great, now who is going to pay for them? Most Californians are stretched to the max; we’ve got taxes upon taxes coming out of our ears. Does anyone out there know what the property taxes on a $700,000 home are? What about all of these bonds that are pushed on us, sure lets just add $50,000 of solar panels to every home. We all want energy we just don’t want to be inconvenienced and why would you build homes near power line property, whose idea is this and what type of cities approved this plan? I too hate SDG&E it is a family unfriendly company to work for my friends work for SDG&E and they don’t pay their employees a competitive wage and their benefit and retirement suck, I wonder who is making the millions in this company?
Robert wrote on Mar 21, 2006 10:39 AM:The grievous commentary continues with Sempra, et. al., bulldozing their quest for more profits through the lives of mere citizens. It’s the same old story. The purchase of the loyalties of elected officials continues unabated, no matter how well convoluted or disguised to confound identification of the connection. The voices of the people cry out against it to no avail. The almighty dollar conquers all. Randy Cunningham is gone, but was he not just a flower? What about the rest of the plant? The infrastructure that allowed him to flourish for so long unchallenged has not died or been jailed. It has just retracted, laying low, waiting for the next opportunity to extract more profit and freedom from the people. In this case opening markets for it's Mexican power plants, built there because, cheaply constructed, they're too dirty to be legal in the U.S. Remember Duke Energy! (now isn't that an odd coincidence?) Does anyone really believe that this leopard has changed it's spots? I'm sure the corporate attorneys and lawmakers will make sure that all is "legal". So we will mourn the loss of another piece of priceless wilderness, most rare, especially in Southern California, as the hydra of the ole boys raises yet another head, to suck more profit from the people in it's insatiable and self-perpetuating greed. America, the land of the Free and the home of the Brave? Do the people really have the courage to say "NO" to this, in sufficient numbers to actually stop it? Or is it too far outside of the comfort zone of Southern Californians? Anza-Borrego Desert State Park belongs to the people of California and is enjoyed by all who visit it as a place to truly step out of time. The fragile environment of Anza Borrego still preserves the stagecoach tracks and petroglyphs of people long since departed in the stream of time. How long will the scars of bulldozers and earth movers remain there? What legacy is that for our descendants? What will that say about us to them? America needs wilderness to preserve and nurture our national spirit. What access roads will be built for construction and line inspection and maintenance vehicles? Surely there are existing rights of way elsewhere that could be utilized or shared. A southern route is more direct than the proposed route. For example, I8 is already there. Why not follow that path? Leave Anza-Borrego alone.
Linda wrote on Mar 21, 2006 11:33 AM:Robert you are so true. I go to the desert every other weekend with my family and it seems that places are being closed down enough as it is. The area is so beautiful. They need to "LEAVE IT ALONE"
Larry wrote on Mar 21, 2006 11:41 AM:If this line has to be built, it should follow existing right of ways. There are already large transmission lines running between San Diego and Imperial Counties. "Piggybacking" on these existing routes will lessen visual and environmental impacts.
lp wrote on Mar 21, 2006 12:29 PM:New State-of-the-art transmission lines are a neccessary evil for the survival of San Diego and its surrounding communities for the future. What I would like to see Sempra get involved in is in the area of Fuel Cells and self contained power.. like they have in certain parts of the country already.
Dane wrote on Mar 21, 2006 5:57 PM:The obvious question is - why transmit power a couple of hundred miles rather than just generate it where it's consumed? The power is largely consumed in the metropolitan areas of SD county so build the power plants there and the transmission problems don't exist. It'll also be far more efficient (and therefore less polluting) due to less power loss through transmission resistance. There are two arguments in favor of the long transmission lines - ultimately obtaining power from Mexico (along with dirtier power plants, more pollution), and possibly obtaining 'alternate sources' of energy such as geothermal and solar - the Borrego desert has geothermal reserves and plenty of sunshine. I wonder how the conservationists who force this ridiculous 'alternative energy source' legislation without understanding the full picture and ramifications feel now? I hope they live next to the transmission lines carrying their geothermal/solar energy. SDG&E and other power companies will simply go where they can make the most profit and still abide by the laws constraining them. You can bet they'll make the most of advertising the 'clean, renewable energy sources' these transmission lines might carry - but they won't advertise the cheap, dirty power that goes along with it along with the visual, land, environmental, and mag field pollution that goes with the transmission of energy over long distances.
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (9444)
- TEMECULA: Protesters line intersection (5796)
- ESCONDIDO: 3 DUI arrests, 46 impounds at checkpoint (4653)
- ESCONDIDO: City's dreams of an 'upscale' downtown may be dying (4372)
- ESCONDIDO: Victim's roommate recalls July 4 shooting, friends gather for vigil (4050)
Advertisement




