Teachers, district progress on salary talks

By: JENNIFER KABBANY - Staff Writer | Wednesday, March 22, 2006 11:38 PM PST

TEMECULA ---- Teachers and district officials made a small bit of progress on finding common ground to resolve their ongoing salary dispute after representatives from the two parties met for about two hours late Wednesday afternoon, a teachers union leader said.

"I am cautiously optimistic," said Brian Wixom, vice president of the Temecula Valley Educators Association. "At the last meeting we had, (the former superintendent) said this is our last, best and final offer, and (on Wednesday) they intimated there might be something out there."

But it remains to be seen what that something might be, Wixom said.

No dollar figures were exchanged, and the teachers union and Temecula Valley Unified School District officials have scheduled another meeting for March 31, he said.

District officials were unavailable for comment late Wednesday. Board President Barbara Tooker said Wednesday that although she had not yet been debriefed on how the meeting went, she was pleased to hear there were plans to continue talks.

"We are looking forward to continuing the conversation to get this resolved as soon as possible," Tooker said. "It's in the best interests of everybody."

Wixom said the planned meeting during spring break shows a certain resolve on both sides.

"We have wanted to get these negotiations over with, but we are not willing to sacrifice what we feel is right," he said.

This year's contract negotiations, which started last spring and have nearly reached the one-year mark, have been plagued with strife in recent months.

In January, more than 200 teachers called in sick on the same day, causing the high schools to shut down early. Two weeks ago, about 90 percent of the district's teachers "worked to rule," or only did what it is required of them in their employment contract.

And at recent school board meetings, many teachers have voiced their concerns about what they contend is a lack of respect from district officials and trustees.

The teachers union and district officials are negotiating for a three-year employment contract that began July 1, the start of this fiscal year.

They started the talks by working out a lot of issues unrelated to a salary offer. Union leaders said the delay on talking about salaries was done on behalf of district officials, who stated they wouldn't know what they could offer until a financial report was completed in December.

The district has now put two offers on the table, a one- and a three-year offer.

The one-year offer is a 4 percent raise for this fiscal year, retroactive to Jan. 1.

The three-year offer is a 4 percent raise for this year, retroactive to Jan. 1, a 4.1 percent raise the following year, and a 3 percent raise the year after that. Part of the offer also includes raising the health benefits cap by $750 annually in the coming two years.

Under the three-year offer, teachers who are eligible for step-and-column raises would receive an additional 6 percent to 16 percent salary increase in the next 18 months, district officials have said.

Step-and-column increases are annual pay increases based on education and number of years worked. About 50 percent of the district's teachers are eligible for those raises every year, and they are given in addition to the across-the-board raises.

District officials have also said that next year's raise could possibly be 5.1 percent if teachers are willing to give up elementary school preparation time and accept a per-diem rate when they choose to work programs such as Saturday school and summer school. That caveat is what many teachers said prompted the "work to rule" action this month.

Teachers are requesting cost-of-living adjustments that match what the state is expected to give the district for the next three years. The union has also called for thousands of dollars to be added to the teachers' health benefits cap over the next three years.

Both offers also mean trustees would have to cut programs from the classroom, and district officials have estimated as much as $2.1 million must be axed to balance next year's budget.

Contact staff writer Jennifer Kabbany at (951) 676-4315, Ext. 2625, or jkabbany@californian.com.

Next Previous
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

JustforLaffs wrote on Mar 23, 2006 1:54 AM:After sickouts and name calling, now we find there was room for neogiations that both sides claim were at a stalemate? Perhaps both the district and the teachers are little more than drama queens. They both appear to be acting much like the adolecents they are charged to educated...go figure!

Still Don't Get It wrote on Mar 23, 2006 4:43 AM:I still don't understand why TVUSD always cries "POOR". I read the Californian, and just a few weeks ago and officials from BOTH the Menifee and Murrieta districts said they would be awash in cash next year. Menifee is much smaller than TVUSD, and Meenifee said they will have more than FIVE MILLION dollars in NEW funds. So, I ask TVUSD...What gives?

Sounds familiar wrote on Mar 23, 2006 8:50 AM:If the TVUSD is anything like the Vista Unified School District, the district needs all that money to give themselves raises, and to drug test kids in band and extra curricular activities.

Ron wrote on Mar 23, 2006 8:58 AM:Same as usual. Man, wouldn't it be sweet if all of us could help get our boss hired, then remind him during your review how much he owes us, cause we helped him get the job to begin with? What a racket. Sounds a lot like a Soprano's episode.

Tired of teachers wrote on Mar 23, 2006 10:36 AM:You got to be kidding me. This is absurd. Good teachers should be rewarded and the not-so-good should not. Just like in any performance based employment. The problem here is that its all or none and that is a load of crap as far as I am concerned. Get rid of them all and then hire them back with performance based contracts.

Teddy wrote on Mar 23, 2006 10:38 AM:They're paying this interim $700.00 a day, or about $52,000, which is the equivalent of TWICE the annual funding for the Aquatics programs at all three high schools. Ironically, the school board refuses to fund this expense, and instead it is paid for out of the athletics budget at each site. You can't cry poverty and at the same time invent ways to waste the taxpayers money!!!!

Wow-Incredible! wrote on Mar 23, 2006 9:55 PM:You can't blame the teacher's negotiations for cutting programs -much more money was wasted on building a school that won't even open than on salary negotiations. This district always wastes funds on everything and then during negotiations tells the teachers they don't have money left for them. Lack of leadership and poor planning-yes, but no money, they have it-just watch!

You bet!! wrote on Mar 29, 2006 8:48 PM:This district has become a joke under Tooker and her band of merry morons!!!

TVUSD's Failure wrote on Apr 3, 2006 6:12 AM:The title of Best Performing Schools will NOT be TVUSD's much longer...minimum support for students, teachers and community will eventually show itself...All of the parents who flock to put their child in 'such great schools' will see a horrifying turnaround as teachers leave in groups and TVUSD, in a panic, must hire ANYONE they can get, leading to awesome turnover, plummeting grades, testscores and graduation rates.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos