Marines: Miramar airport won't fly
By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | ∞
An F/A-18 'Hornet,' a twin engine, multi-mission attack aircraft, takes off Friday from Miramar Marine Corps Air Station.
WALDO NILO Staff Photographer
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery
MIRAMAR MARINE CORPS AIR STATION ---- To the public, it may sound simple and innocuous: A regional agency wants a mere 3,000 of the Marines' 23,000 acres at Miramar for an international airport and would be quite content if the military kept, and continued to train on, the remainder of its base in the heart of San Diego County.
But Marine Lt. Col. Rick Pagel said Friday that the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, poised to recommend Miramar next week as its preferred site for a new airport, is proposing something that is far more complex than what appears on the surface.
The airport authority is essentially proposing "a two-dimensional solution to a three-dimensional problem," Pagel said during a three-hour base tour for the media, to make the case that Miramar is the wrong location for a commercial airport.
Airport Authority officials have acknowledged that the Marines would have to shift activities around if airliners were to land at Miramar, but they maintain that military and civilian operations could be compatible if both sides exercised some imagination.
A Monday vote by the authority board is expected to cap a 3 1/2-year search for a site for an airport to replace cramped Lindbergh Field, which agency officials contend will run out of room to handle passenger and cargo growth as early as 2020. With 17 million passengers passing through its gates last year, Lindbergh is the nation's busiest single-runway commercial airport.
Candidate airport sites include Miramar, Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base, Naval Air Station North Island, Campo, Borrego Springs, Imperial County and March Air Reserve Base in Riverside County, as well as an expanded Lindbergh. Military officers have repeatedly and emphatically insisted that none of the local bases are available, and federal legislation would bar their use.
As F-18s screamed overhead at 160 mph, and pilots practiced left-hand turns and aircraft-carrier landings over and over again Friday morning, Pagel suggested the third dimension is the Marine air space that airliners would invade. Even if the Marines could find 3,000 acres to give up, he said, in the sky above, the relatively slow-moving commercial jets would not mix with the speedy and maneuverable military jets.
The F-18s practice off and on between 7:30 a.m. and midnight Monday through Thursday, between 7:30 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Saturday and between 2 and 6 p.m. on Sunday, Pagel said. And because of the nature of what they are doing, in practicing carrier landings, F-18 pilots tend to circle over and over again, he said.
"They're going to keep going until they get it down," Pagel said, of the touch-and-gos that simulate carrier landings. "We don't want them to make a mistake when they're out on the boat."
Consequently, he said, it wouldn't make sense to expect a pilot to make a pass or two, and then get out of the way so an airliner could make its approach.
And it's not likely that the military could shift the carrier landing practices to Camp Pendleton if the authority were to propose a compromise that entailed constructing a runway for Marines there, said Maj. Gen. Michael Lehnert, commander of Marine Corps Installations West.
"What we do at Camp Pendleton is train for war," Lehnert said. "The air around Camp Pendleton tends to be filled with bullets."
Pagel said the current situation at Miramar is ideal for pilot training because it is safe, and because the flying pattern keeps jets north of State Route 52. If any plane falls to the ground, it will fall onto the base rather than onto houses, and there is minimal noise impact, he said.
But the construction of runways next to the existing airfield to accommodate the airliners would push the pattern either over Mira Mesa and Scripps Ranch to the north, or over Clairemont Mesa, Kearny Mesa and Tierrasanta to the south, introducing danger and noise to the neighborhoods that largely do not have to worry about either now, Pagel said.
There would be other impacts on the ground as well.
Miramar is home to more than 3,000 biologically rich seasonal ponds called vernal pools, and close to half would be covered by a new airport, said Dave Boyer, Miramar's director of natural resources. That is of particular concern, he said, because about 97 percent of the county's original vernal pools have been paved over, and 80 percent of remaining pools are on Miramar.
At least five of the 10 endangered species on the base would be affected, Boyer said. He said those include the San Diego fairy shrimp, San Diego mesa mint plant, San Diego button celery plant, coastal California gnatcatcher bird and the willowy monardella plant.
Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 740-5442 or ddowney@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Sick of It wrote on Jun 2, 2006 10:57 PM:Yawn, more of the same lies lies lies. The military can't do their job the same anywhere else in the southwest? I don't believe we can't re-locate them for under $10 bil. If they say we can't they're no better than the bunch in O'side.
3000 acres wrote on Jun 3, 2006 12:04 AM:Joint use is ludicrous,if the Marines are forced to evacuate Miramar,by vote , presidential decree, base closure policy,etc. so be it. However the effect would be far reaching, not only to the economics but the landscape of the region.For one just the thought of the traffic is overwhelming.One could go on about pros and cons of the other issues, job creation etc. Slow growth patterns would be helped by the status quo.
Sam wrote on Jun 3, 2006 6:11 AM: Get off your high horses people, open your eyes and look at the area in the middle of the county out near Rancho Santa Fe. Plenty of room and the airport would be located handy to all of San Diego County. The problem: It seems easier to the Agency to take it from Miramar than to place it where the people at Rancho Santa Fe can hear the planes. San Diego has been trying to get Miramar since 1958 and has failed and will fail again. The answer - stop playing politics and take land you need.
Greedy and Self Serving! wrote on Jun 3, 2006 8:44 AM:Southern Californians are a lot of things! But one thing they seem to be best at is, whining to get the most of everything, even if it means taking over a military base to develop and create more consumption. More stuff, more developing, I want it, so therefore I will buy it. Even if it means compromising national security! How about going to Oceanside and Vista and creating a mid way airport in those cities, not on the base, in the cities and create a tax base and commerce for those crap holes pretending to be incorporated places of government!
Jay wrote on Jun 3, 2006 3:29 PM:Of course this shows the damage done to the county's economy when SD Mayor Golding turned down the Navy's offer and so the Marines moved to Miramar instead of March AFB. At this point, parallel runways would complicate operations, but given the air force shares an entire base and runways with a civilian airport (Hickam/Honolulu Int'l) the idea that two airports are infeasible (as opposed to inconvenient) is just blowing smoke. Top Gun couldn't be done anywhere else and now it's in Nevada. Ditto the Marines. The only thing that's absolutely irreplaceable is Pendleton -- the only facility like that in the Pacific. As long as SD fails to solve its airport problem, the El Toro NIMBYs will continue to push their truly dangerous idea of building an airport that overflies the amphibious assault area on base.
Dave wrote on Jun 3, 2006 9:56 PM:As much as I like a Miramar idea, I agree with Jay that a Pendleton idea is completely absurd. San Diego needs to choose a solution now so it can be open by 2030 or so.
Pittsburgh wrote on Jun 5, 2006 12:50 AM:Has anyone here ever looked a Google Maps?!?! You have half of a county that undeveloped to the east, yet they want to build a commercial airport where there is already a military base! You people are self-serving, selfish, and anti-military. What it comes down to is houses were built around Miramar, and now Miramar is in their way. They wanted to expand an airport at El Toro also. What did they do? Nothing but try to use the land to develop more and more.
Voice of Reason wrote on Jun 7, 2006 10:31 AM:Pit... You see that Mountain Range to the east? Thats part of the problem. You have to locate an airport within about 6 miles of the coastline or you have too steep of an approach slope ro 100 miles away from the city - a total non-starter. Mt. San Miguel out in East Lake/Jamul even affects Lindbergh. We aren't Texas or Nebraska... Unfortunately...
- OCEANSIDE: Killer may be granted parole (6645)
- RANCHO BERNARDO: Cyclist hit by car was retired Navy captain, avid athlete (6157)
- SOLANA BEACH: Pregnant woman, fetus killed in I-5 hit-and-run (5213)
- CHARGERS: Sproles carries Bolts to playoff win over Colts (4357)
- ENCINITAS: Carlsbad has questions about Encinitas shopping center plan (3985)
Advertisement



