Carlsbad family switches to ethanol car

By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | Saturday, July 8, 2006 9:57 PM PDT

Mary Oren with her E-85 ethanol flex-fuel vehicle. Finding the fuel for her GMC Yukon is more difficult with only one service station in the entire county.
JOHN KOSTER For The North County Times
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery

CARLSBAD ---- When it came time to replace the family car, the baseball-loving Orens, with their border collie named "Fenway," decided to buy a used car instead of a new one.

"We like to eat sunflower seeds and spit them out the window," said Mary Oren, 46, of Carlsbad, in a recent interview. "It's disgusting. So why buy a new car if it's just going to get yucky real fast?"

Oren said she persuaded her husband, Mered, to shop for a car that would get better gas mileage than their 1994 Chevrolet Suburban, which had 150,000 miles on it and burned a gallon of gas for every 11 miles it moved down the road. The family finally settled earlier this summer on a 2004 GMC Yukon that offered the promise of slightly better mileage, 15 miles to the gallon, and, more importantly, the chance to burn a more environmentally friendly fuel: ethanol.

"I truly could not buy a gas-sucking SUV and feel good about it anymore," Oren said.

The Oren family never dreamed, however, it would be so difficult to fill up. They have had a difficult time finding the fuel because only one public station in the entire state carries it.

Ethanol is widely available in one sense. It has been used as an additive in regular gasoline at stations throughout California for several years, ever since the state banned the additive MTBE (methyl tertiary butyl ether) in 1999 because it was polluting groundwater and lakes.

MTBE was added to make gas burn cleaner and pollute the air less, and ethanol has taken its place. According to the California Energy Commission, more than 95 percent of gasoline sold in California today contains 6 percent ethanol.

In short supply, however, is the emerging alternative fuel known as E85, so named because it is composed of 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline. The Orens' "flex-fuel vehicle" is designed to run on either that concentrated ethanol fuel or on gasoline. The Orens would prefer the former because it is considered renewable ---- it is made from corn that can be grown over and over again ---- and can reduce the nation's dependence on foreign oil.

"I love the idea of the fuel going into my car coming from farmers in the United States instead of from foreign countries," Mary Oren said.

Taking care of planet is taking care of kids


Oren, who recently found inspiration in Al Gore's documentary movie, "An Inconvenient Truth," on global warming, said she also wants to do her part to counter climate change, something she suggests poses a greater threat than anything else to future generations.

"We do so much for our children. We choose nice neighborhoods for them to live in, we watch what they eat and we help them in school," said Oren, who grew up in Santa Barbara and earned a bachelor's degree in speech from San Diego State University in 1983. "It's ironic because we are trying so hard to provide everything we can for our kids in the short run, but they will be worse off in the long run because of our behavior. The best thing we can do for our kids is to take better care of our planet."

Both of her kids are boys: Wyatt, 13, and Davis, 11. And both are baseball players. Given the name of their 4-month-old pet, it hardly comes as a surprise that their favorite team is the Boston Red Sox.

What is surprising, perhaps, is that the family obtained the pooch from a family of avid New York Yankee fans, she said. The Orens were careful to wait until after they came home to name the dog.

Soon after the Orens began tooling around in their used Yukon, the challenge of personally taking better care of the planet came into sharp focus. Filling up on the alternative, clean-burning fuel turned out to be anything but convenient.

While more than 800 gas stations across the United States sell the concentrated ethanol fuel, only four in California do, according to the National Ethanol Vehicle Coalition, a nonprofit advocacy group that promotes the 85 percent ethanol fuel. And only one of those four stations is open to the public.

It just so happens that the one station is in San Diego County. It is Pearson Ford Fuels at the Regional Transportation Center at 4001 El Cajon Blvd. in central San Diego, off Interstate 15.

Pent-up demand


The only problem is, it's more than 25 miles from Carlsbad. Just getting there requires burning nearly 2 gallons of fuel, not to mention the return trip. So the Orens have been mostly filling up with gasoline.

Oren said the lack of availability is frustrating.

"Why can't we get ethanol in North County?" she asked. "In a state that has more cars on the road than in any other state, we can't get alternative fuels. That's crazy."

Michelle Kautz, a spokeswoman for the National Ethanol Vehicle Coalition in Jefferson City, Mo., said her group is trying to do something about that. The coalition is lobbying California to refine its process for certifying stations that sell E85, a process some suggest is expensive and cumbersome and a major obstacle to the establishment of stations, Kautz said.

"There is much pent-up demand for the use of E85 in California," Kautz said.

Susanne Garfield, a spokeswoman for the California Energy Commission, said any efforts to streamline the process will have to be tempered against concerns about the potential damage the fuel can cause. Garfield said the ethanol tends to eat away at some gas-pump parts and that's why the state requires service station owners to purchase fuel dispensers with upgraded materials that are more expensive.

As for the fuel itself, the state looks on it favorably, said Jerry Martin, a spokesman for the California Air Resources Board, because it holds down levels of all types of air pollutants. In contrast, the fraction of ethanol in most gas actually tends to slightly raise levels of one pollutant, nitrogen oxides, which is a concern in high-smog areas such as the Los Angeles basin, Martin said.

Kautz said she is optimistic that the coalition will reach an agreement with the state that soon will pave the way for more California ethanol stations.

But Mike Lewis, general manager and co-owner of Pearson Ford Fuel Depot, a futuristic-looking service station that sells nine different fuels, said he's not holding his breath.

"San Diego will not have any more ethanol stations for a while, and neither will California," Lewis predicted, saying his center that sells nine different types of fuels obtained a special permit from the Air Resources Board several years ago to sell E85. The company also sells compressed natural gas and biodiesel, besides traditional gasoline, and recharges electric cars.

Lewis said the fuel center invested about $100,000 in ethanol dispensing equipment and had to endure lengthy state reviews.

Besides the ethanol, the depot boasts an EcoCenter for Alternative Fuel Education that teaches busloads of children about alternatives to fossil fuels. Ford Motor Co. contributed $1.4 million for the center's development.

More ethanol cars to come


Lewis said the central San Diego station annually sells about 70,000 gallons of E85.

"The demand for the fuel fluctuates wildly, and it fluctuates based on the price of gasoline," he said. "There are days when I sell nothing and there are days when I sell 500 gallons."

At one point, ethanol was half a dollar cheaper when gas prices were hovering around $3.50 a gallon, Lewis said. More recently, E85 has been running about a nickel higher than gas, he said.

Nationwide, more than 30 states have ethanol stations. But they are heavily concentrated in the Midwest, half of them in Illinois and Minnesota, the coalition says. The nation's 813 ethanol outlets compare to 170,000 service stations nationwide.

At the same time, the coalition estimates there are 6 million flex-fuel vehicles on the road, including more than 200,000 in California. That compares to a total of more than 200 million passenger cars and trucks in the United States.

The number of ethanol cars on the highway is expected to accelerate in coming years. Just last week, DaimlerChrysler, Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Corp. announced a plan to double the nation's current annual production of flex-fuel vehicles to 2 million by 2010.

According to the coalition, 22 flex-fuel models were produced for model 2006 cars and more are coming for model year 2007.

But all those cars won't make a dent in this country's dependence if not a drop of ethanol can be found.

"We can't show our buying power until they give us the fuel," Oren said. "The truth is, people want to buy it, businesses want to sell it and we should be able to get it."

Contract staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 740-5442 or ddowney@nctimes.com.

Next Previous
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Sick of It wrote on Jul 8, 2006 10:46 PM:Wow, that's so special. I had an E85 vehicle 3 years ago, and it was a 1992 model. They're nothing new at all. I'm glad I've since replaced it with a 35+ mpg vehicle though, which while it's not a FFV has much lower emissions output. It'd be nice to have more FFVs on the road, but since we ethanol out of corn in the US, and the corn requires a lot of energy to process, it's still not very efficient.

Algore wrote on Jul 8, 2006 11:46 PM:Gee whiz! This gal sees an Al Gore movie, and buys a used car based on that. Didn't bother to see if there was actually fuel available for the fuel slurping SUV... Duh.

Another Way wrote on Jul 9, 2006 8:07 AM:Here's another way to help the environment ... Keep you trash to yourself and Quit spitting your sunflower seeds out the window!!!

Another Way wrote on Jul 9, 2006 8:08 AM:Here's another way to help the environment ... Keep your trash to yourself and Quit spitting your sunflower seeds out the window!!!

Mary wrote on Jul 9, 2006 8:32 AM:Does anyone realize how much land you will need to plant enough corn to produce enough ethanol to make a dent? It's a heck of a lot of ADDITIONAL land, plus we still need land to produce corn for livestock and human consumption. And you need a lot of water to make corn grow. And I hate to break the news to Ms. Oren. A lot of this corn is NOT going to be grown in the US. For example, Brazil is seriously on the band wagon producing ethanol. They have a lot of land plus the labor is cheap. If the demand is great enough for ethanol with the resultant potential riches, Brazil and other countries may even start cutting down the rain forests to get even more land available for growing corn. Shoot, if you can get enough water to the Middle East (maybe with global warming and rising seas-they can convert the sea water for irrigation water-hey, there's a potential future for some entrepeneurs who can develop this technology), this area with its deserts and land and cheap labor, you can start growing corn there. Then the Middle East will start selling us ethanol instead of fossil fuel oil. As for me, I will continue to drive my honking big Ford 250 super cab truck, because I love it.

Joe wrote on Jul 9, 2006 9:36 AM:Mary has a point in that producing ethanol from corn is very inefficient and requires a lot of gasoline and diesel fuel to run the farm machinery necessary to grow corn. Further, if the demand for corn rises, more land will go into that, reducing the acreage to produce other food crops, such as wheat and soy beans, hence up goes the price of food from those sources. And then there is the higher price beef and other meat producers will have to pay for feed corn to compete with the price paid to make ethanol, so up goes the price of meat. All in all, while it sounds great to produce fuel for your car on someone's farm, it really is not a good long-range solution, although it's got a lot of political support right now. As usual, politicians take the short range view and care primarily about getting themselves elected to positions that allow them to dip into the pork barrel -- pigs competing for a place at the trough! As for Brazil, Mary, they use sugar cane to produce ethanol, not corn, and that's a lot cheaper. The only reason we don't import more sugar cane produced ethanol from Brazil is because our pork barrel politicians, who suck at the spigot of the oil companies, have passed laws restricting ethanol imports from Brazil. And by the way, in Brazil, if I recall the figure correctly, about 30% of vehicles now burn ethanol and for years they have been producing flex fuel vehicles. But, Mary, as long as you are determined to take the self-centered view that it does matter how much gas you burn, then nothing you have to say on the subject counts for much. You have a lot of company in that silly delight for burning gas, so I think what we can reasonably expect is that there's $4 and $5 a gallon gasoline in our near future. Cars aren't just boxes with wheels and a motor to transport the body, but are toys for recreation, no matter what the cost, and devices for putting our selves on display, extending our big egos into the world and to hell with the world, just so it pays attention -- and get out of my way or I'll monster mash you with my honking big wheels! (What do I drive? A Chevy Aveo, and I walk and ride my bike a lot. And while I'm walking I often pick up the cans, bottles and other trash that folks throw out the windows of those big gas guzzlers rushing by. I don't think my efforts amount to much, but if more people joined in it probably would help.)

John wrote on Jul 9, 2006 9:51 AM:One idea: Grow corn and other bio-mass in the Central Valley where there is already water available. The Central Valley can grow enough bio-mass to meet California's and several other states needs for alcohol. This can be done with mechanized equipment like in the Midwest and no illegals. One farmer in the Midwest farms at least one thousand acres. Deport the illegals from the Central Valley. Buy vegetables from Mexico and other countries where the local labor can be paid to harvest them. Everyone wins.

Huh? wrote on Jul 9, 2006 11:11 AM:She buys a used Yukon and thinks that's pretty special? Comes across like the bozos who drive 15mpg VW vans and think they're being environmentally concious. Or the drivers of ancient smoke belching Volvo wagons with a Greenpeace sticker on the back.

Joe wrote on Jul 9, 2006 11:27 AM:A bit of a correction to my earlier remarks: actually it is the U.S. agricultural industry that has provided the major pressure on congress to limit importing relatively cheaper sugar cane ethanol from Brazil. But at the level of large corporate business, agriculture and oil are pretty closely tied together. And the only green they're really interested in has to do with money, not the environment.

Barbara wrote on Jul 11, 2006 8:58 AM:Thank you to bringing light to this obviously contraversal subject. I wish more people had the courage to try to make a change for the better in such a public format. You have definately gotten us thinking about the role we all play in helping the environment.

Michael Tanous wrote on Jul 12, 2006 10:57 AM:If you give the masses the ability to grow a fuel supply locally, than you take the grip off our economy from the Middle East and huge oil corporations. You have more competition, which means less reliance on any one entity which is a great thing for a country as energy reliant as ours. The major problem with oil is that the situation is going to get exponentionally worse very soon. China and India are buying as much fuel as they can get their hands on, which is driving up costs. And I mean costs to do anything, build a house, run a steel mill, run a farm, tourism to San Diego, manufacture your Ipod. The Middle East pumps out more fuel now than ever, but apparently there is less to go around. Well say hello to what is called a nonrenewable energy supply. If we dont change now, or at least try to change, we are heading for a disaster very soon. I think we should stop bashing tree lovers and people who love their fuel efficient cars, hybrids and what not, and try to see past the 60 years left of fuel in Saudia Arabia.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos