'Toilet to tap' proposal calls for recycled water for San Diego

By: JOE BRITTON - North County Times wire services | Thursday, July 27, 2006 2:06 AM PDT

SAN DIEGO - Treated sewage would be used to augment reservoirs used to supply drinking water to San Diego's increasingly growing population in a plan presented to a City Council committee today.

The proposal, dubbed "toilet to tap," is one of six strategies outlined in a nearly $1 million Water Department plan to increase the amount of recycled water used in San Diego.

The council rejected a similar proposal in 1999.

Without endorsing the plan, the Natural Resources and Culture Committee voted to forward it to the full City Council for consideration.

The year-long study was compiled by a 67-member Assembly on Water Reuse, composed of representatives from the offices of elected officials, community groups, business organizations and environmentalists.

San Diego has had a recycled water program since 1997, which produces about 38 million gallons a day for irrigation and industrial purposes only, Jim Barrett, director of the Water Department, told the committee.

Council President Scott Peters, who is not a member of the committee, but testified at the start of the meeting, said most of the recycled water produced by the Water Department is not used.

"The bulk of this precious resource is dumped into the sanitary sewer system because of the expense of building the `purple pipe' network," Peters said, referring to the separate pipes now required to move recycled water.

Instead of dumping the unused treated sewage, the plan recommends the city further treat it and add it to drinking water reservoirs.

According to the study, recycled water is being used for potable purposes in El Paso, Texas; Fairfax County, Va.; Singapore and Orange County.

"I just don't think we are in a place where we can turn our backs on a clean, steady and locally produced supply of water," Peters said.

Councilman Kevin Faulconer indicated he would not support the proposal because it would be too cost prohibitive.

"For me, most of this comes down to cost and I just don't know that this will be feasible," Faulconer said.

Faulconer also suggested the idea would not garner public support.

"I don't think we are there yet," Faulconer told the committee. "I don't think the public is there yet."

Mayor Jerry Sanders has also said he would not support the idea.

The plan also suggests the city consider:

-- expanding the system for irrigation and industrial customers;

-- using recycled water to recharge, improve or protect groundwater basins;

-- creating storage reservoirs for recycled water;

-- adding recycled water to streams or use it to create wetlands; and

-- adding recycled water to aquifers used for drinking water supplies after additional advanced treatment.

According to the report, San Diego imports about 85 percent of its water from the Colorado River and Northern California and demand is expected to grow by about 25 percent by 2030.

Much of what is imported into the city is already tainted with treated or recycled wastewater, according to Councilwoman Donna Frye.

"The citizens of San Diego are, in fact, drinking treated wastewater," Frye said. "It's something that is happening now."

Next
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Michael wrote on Jul 27, 2006 11:39 AM:The title of this article shows the intent of the writer to make sure this measure gets killed, especailly with the constant reference to "treated sewage" which isn't the case. The term is used to bring to mind pictures of effluent with brown chunks floating it being dumped into the reservoirs and that is not the case. Go to the Orange County facility and check out their recycled water and you will find that it is acutally cleaner than tap water because of the cleaning, filtering and disinfection, so that's what will be going into the reservoir. Your representation of "toilet to tap" is really an injustice to the process that the water goes through and the purity of the water after it is reclaimed.

YUMO wrote on Jul 27, 2006 11:48 AM:What a tasty thought the next time you take a long, cool drink of water from the tap! Maybe the city should consider limiting housing developments until we can provide adequate renewable energy and water that isn't recycled from our toilets for the citizens that already live here!

noway wrote on Jul 27, 2006 9:36 PM:I dont care how safe they say it is, it will never happen. Lets wait and see and check on the medical status of people drinking this water 50 years from now, see what they mutate into. They say its clean by all the test we run, but can they say that there is no possibility that their test can miss something. would they bet there lives on it or thier kids lives on it, i dont think so. I bet the people drinking this will start developing cancer in 20 years.

Thinker wrote on Jul 29, 2006 12:14 PM:Mr. Britton: I wish newpaper more headline writers and reporters would spend more time trying to educate their readers than they do trying to scare them with bogus headlines. Its pitiful to see semi-literate journalists who can't seem to get past buzzwords and focus on the substance of a story. Are you too lazy to do your homework on a complex issue, or just too dumb to care? Its because of stupid stories like this that we can't have a serious discussion of the science and history of beneficial water reuse here in California's dumbest city. I wish the North County Times would hire some real journalists instead of hacks.

Politicians should drink wrote on Jul 30, 2006 4:09 PM:The politicians should drink it first for the next 20 years. Then consider it for the public.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos