State says power line would 'forever change' Anza-Borrego

By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:12 PM PDT

On the eve of a key public meeting in Ramona on a proposed power transmission line, state officials raised "serious concerns" about the environmental toll the project would exact on Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, which they called "the jewel of California's state park system."

And state park officials are calling on a regulatory body to direct San Diego Gas & Electric Co., the company proposing to build the power line, to look for another alternative route that would run south of California's largest state park, which covers much of eastern San Diego County.

The proposed $1.3 billion power transmission line, known as the Sunrise Powerlink, "would forever change the character of this pristine park," wrote Ruth Coleman, director of the California Department of Parks and Recreation, in a 15-page statement filed with a state regulatory body on Sept. 5.

That body, the California Public Utilities Commission, has scheduled a so-called prehearing conference on the project for 4 p.m. today in the Charles Nunn Performing Arts Center at Olive Peirce Middle School, 1521 Hanson Lane, Ramona. The conference agenda calls for discussing the nuts and bolts of the project, the review process and the timeline for making a decision before taking public comment later on. The meeting is expected to last several hours.

The statement from park officials is one of several that opponents and supporters filed in advance for the prehearing conference.

While stopping short of opposing the project, Coleman wrote that the 23 miles of wires SDG&E wants to run through the "heart of Anza-Borrego" would force the state to change its land-use blueprint for the park and erase 73 acres of protected wilderness, she said.

That is because the existing electrical easement through the park ranges from 24 to 100 feet wide, and SDG&E is seeking permission to enlarge that corridor to 150 feet.

Coleman wrote that she could not recall an earlier decision to shrink state wilderness.

"To do so for this project would set a dangerous precedent that would mean that state park lands and state wilderness are merely held in trust by the state of California until such time as they may be needed by private developers or utility companies," she wrote. Anza-Borrego has more than 400,000 acres of protected lands, representing 80 percent of California's state wilderness system, she said.

Stephanie Donovan, a spokeswoman for the San Diego-based utility, said SDG&E wants to design the project in such a way that it has the least possible impact on the land.

"We are still hopeful that we can come up with a compromise solution that can mitigate the line through the park," Donovan said.

Coleman countered there is no way to hide from public view the enormous towers that would be 130 to 140 feet high ---- three times higher and many times more massive than the wooden power poles in the park now.

As for the notion of building the line around the park, Donovan said, that is easier said than done. All but about two of the more than 50 miles of the desert portion of San Diego County, between Mexico and the Riverside County line, are within the park, she said.

"If there were a better way, believe me, we would have found it," Donovan said. "There are not a lot of options for going east to west that don't go through the park."

SDG&E, which serves $1.3 million customers in San Diego County and southern Orange County, says the Sunrise Powerlink is needed to shore up a projected electricity shortfall next decade and to open a way for the utility to tap into developing nonfossil-fuel sources, such as solar power, in Imperial County. Early next decade, large utilities such as SDG&E will be required to obtain at least a fifth of their electricity from such renewable sources.

"You can't develop them (renewable sources) unless you have a way to get them to market," Donovan said.

The utility is proposing to string 500-kilovolt wires from metallic towers as tall as 160 feet through the backcountry of Imperial County and eastern San Diego County, and through communities such as Ramona. In some urban neighborhoods, sections would be buried underground.

Project opponents do not dispute the need for new electricity to assuage the region's growing thirst for power, but they say there are cheaper, less destructive ways to deliver it, such as building power plants in metropolitan San Diego. Opponents say the presence of the huge towers would drag down property values, harm wildlife, scar the land and mar scenic views in largely unspoiled places such as the park.

Coleman suggested it would be easier to run the line through the Cleveland National Forest than through Anza-Borrego.

It wouldn't be that easy to go through the forest, Donovan said.

"It would literally require an act of Congress," she said.

-- Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 740-5442 or ddowney@nctimes.com.

Next Previous
8 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

jeff wrote on Sep 13, 2006 6:22 AM:THANK YOU STATE OFFICIALS FOR SOME REASONABLE CONCERN. IT TAKES REAL GUTS FOR ANY PUBLIC OFFICALS TO STAND UP TO THE SEMPRA/SDG$E BULLY. THEY USE THE RUSE OF USING GREEN RESOURCES TO OSTENSIBLY HELP US OUT. THEY WILL RAISE RATES AND HELP THEMSELVES INTO OUR POCKETS AND IN THE PROCESS TAKE AWAY SOME WILDERNESS THAT WOULD NEVER COME AGAIN. SDG$E EMPLOYEES PUSHING THIS ARE ONLY THINKING ABOUT THE FAT BONUSES THEY ALL GET QUITE OFTEN. I HAVE RELATIVES WHO WORK FOR THEM.

MikeOceanside wrote on Sep 13, 2006 8:56 AM:Nobody wants these Power lines thru the desert,If i read right this will only power 68,000 home for a cost of 1.3 Billion? We go to the desert all season long and the last thing anyone wants to see are these giant towers. This need to go away fast and the PUC better kill it NOW!

Independant Solar Now wrote on Sep 13, 2006 8:58 AM:We have new legislation with tax incentives ,if that doesn't help enough then let's raise the write off.

I guess the: wrote on Sep 13, 2006 10:13 AM:Only answer is to destroy the desert so that the developers can build condos. Makes sense to me.

blm wrote on Sep 13, 2006 5:35 PM:use the money to develop and support cheaper solar power for ROOFTOPS: we have endless acres of fully sunlit roofs in San Diego, and with today's PV panels, most of an even moderately energy efficinet household can be run on 10-20 panels which will easily fit on most roofs. The distance to that market is about 12 feet, and the panels look cool anyway, even the ones that aren't made to look just like roof shingles.

common sense wrote on Sep 17, 2006 6:46 AM:We do not need this power line. The projectshould be killed. Suggesting the Cleveland National Forest as an alternaive is just as destrucutuve and wasteful of resources as using Anza-Borrego State Park. The National Forest is not a viable option.

desert resident wrote on Oct 11, 2006 2:00 PM:I agree, we do NOT need these power lines ANYWHERE. IF SDG&E cannot use the exisiting route through the southern end of the desert (along Hiway 8) then it just doesn't need to be done. PERIOD!!!! There IS no viable route that will not intrude on SOMEONE. Many people have been led to believe this is NECESSARY, but it is NOT, as has been already stated, it doens't provide service to US, it will go NORTH, so find another way SDG&E, use rooftop solar, we can all provide our OWN elec. And CPU, put an END to this NONSENSE NOW!!!!!

Nichcole wrote on Nov 20, 2006 8:47 AM:Put an end to the greed. Spend the 1.3 Billion on reusable sources like solar. They don't want to do that because if it produces more energy then you use SDG&E has to buy the energy from you. Doesn't anyone care about our land anymore? Don't they make enough money? I pay SDG&E an avg of $2500/year along with their 1.3M customers and this is their only solution! That's 3.2 billion dollars.

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos