Business group declines to take stand on airport
By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | ∞
Marines walk among harrier jets, F/A-18 Hornets and other military aircraft in this recent photo of Miramar Marine Corps Air Station. Military officials say it would be unsafe to share the airport with civilian air traffic.
North County Times File Photo
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery
POWAY ---- One of North County's most prominent business groups decided Thursday to refrain from taking a position on the controversial Miramar airport ballot measure.
The board of directors of the San Diego North Economic Development Council voted 10-4 to neither endorse nor oppose the measure, following a brief board discussion on the issue that county voters will decide in the Nov. 7 general election.
Gary Knight, president and chief executive officer, said after the meeting that there was a feeling on the board that passage of the measure would be a meaningless gesture, given the federal law that bars use of Miramar Marine Corps Air Station for a commercial airport.
"Trying to support something that can't be done is an exercise in futility," Knight said. "Let's look at a more permanent solution than at something that can't occur under current law."
At the same time, he said, board members were concerned that a stance against the measure might be interpreted as being against building an airport.
"And I don't think that's a statement we want to make," he said. "To take a 'no' vote would be to say that things are good the way they are now."
Knight said there is a need for airport improvements that expand flying and shipping options for North County travelers and businesses.
The measure will appear on the ballot as Proposition A. The culmination of 3 1/2 years of study of potential sites, the measure would support the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority's efforts to negotiate an acquisition of 3,000 of Miramar's 23,000 acres by 2020.
The airport board in June rejected such finalist candidates as Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base, Imperial County and Campo, and named Miramar its preferred choice.
The authority maintains that, if a new airport is not built, Lindbergh Field eventually will bog down. Some 17 million passengers passed through Lindbergh last year, and 30 million are forecast to fly in and out of San Diego by 2030. The authority says, however, that Lindbergh ----- with its one runway ---- can't handle more than 25 million.
The Marines, though, have stressed repeatedly and emphatically that a commercial airport is not welcome at Miramar. They say it would dangerously mix airliners and fighter jets in the skies over central San Diego.
Keith Wilschetz, director of airport system planning for the authority, conceded airliners would not mix well with the Marines' FA-18 fighters. But he said the military mission could change and the fighters might not be there down the road.
"If it (the base) becomes available, we want to be able to go in," Wilschetz said.
However, Marine Maj. Ross Hettiger said a commercial airport wouldn't be compatible with Miramar's helicopters, either.
"We would have to leave and the base would have to close," Hettiger said.
Among other groups, the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce's board voted by the slimmest of margins, 19-18, on July 27 to endorse the measure. Then, on Aug. 30, the San Diego County Taxpayers Association voted 12-8 to oppose it.
Earlier this week, the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corp. endorsed a Miramar airport by a vote of 28-8.
Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 740-5442 or ddowney@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
FROWISS wrote on Sep 15, 2006 8:07 AM:Let's hear it for economic development "leaders" who take no position. Isn't the airport supposed to be the 21st century economic engine? Let's have a Bronx cheer for the Airport Authority itself which huffed and puffed for several years, spent tens of millions on out-of-town experts, and came up with the very conclusion which they were appointed to come up with.
Aaron E. wrote on Sep 15, 2006 10:32 AM:Knight's comments are right on the money. The legal question needs to be worked out BEFORE moving forward. Kudos to Knight and the board for pointing out the inconsistency of the current approach.
Common Sense wrote on Sep 15, 2006 11:50 AM:Now - now - FROWISS ... no whining ... let's hear your resolution. Currently, even if it's not the best approach, we have a team assembled and actually made a decision. Now, the people can vote it out and resolve Miramar or not. I do agree that the economic development leaders (San Diego North Economic Development Council)should be on the record stating that they are for or against the measure AND why. If they are to lead ... then lead... not sit back and wait.
Katie wrote on Sep 15, 2006 12:45 PM:Good for them. This entire thing is a farce. The developers want the land Lindbergh is on so they can build condos or some other pricey housing only they and their friends can afford. Additionally, the height restrictions for downtown highrises would be no more.
Voice of Reason wrote on Sep 18, 2006 10:13 AM:Developers are the reason Lindbergh has a problem. The airport is on tide lands, which prohibits private development. It reverts to the Port District for public use. The only thing that's a farce is the politicians in this one horse town.
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement



