Miramar is best spot for new airport
By: PAUL F. McCARTHY - Commentary | Saturday, November 4, 2006 7:22 PM PST ∞

A jet lands on Lindbergh Field's only runway. The Regional Airport Authority says San Diego County’s travels needs will outgrow the downtown airport, and is asking voters through Proposition A if it should pursue building a new airport at Miramar Marine Corps Air Station.
North County Times File Photo
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery
One of the more emotional issues on the ballot for the Nov. 7 election is the airport issue. This issue is not a new one. In a region that hosts a number of military facilities, and has a significant active and retired military population, loyalty and feelings run deep.
However, the region is in a state of transition. What used to be a comfortably sized, military town is now a growing mecca for tourism, technology and commerce.
Since 1959, some 24 airport studies for various agencies have been conducted, the most comprehensive of them completed this year. Those studies have two common threads. The first was that San Diego and this region would outgrow San Diego International Airport at Lindbergh Field and its now 661 acres. The second was that one of the prime locations, if not the prime location, for a true international airport was Miramar.
When you look at this situation, it appears an exceedingly difficult situation ---- a Hobson's choice ---- until you ask yourself three questions:
1. Do we need a new international airport?
2. If we do, where should it be located?
3. What is the strategy to get there?
All of the studies concluded that Lindbergh will be inadequate in the next 15 to 20 years; maybe earlier, maybe later.
True, we can improve Lindbergh by purchasing some land, if it's available, adding gates and enhancing some facilities, but that is a Band-Aid approach. We cannot build dual, independent runways that will accommodate long-range aircraft. We cannot eliminate the very steep approach in between buildings in our ever-developing downtown skyline. At the same time, almost no one predicts a decrease in air travel to or from San Diego.
Location is the hard question. The most recent study considered many alternative locations, but, like its predecessors, this study concluded that the only viable location was Miramar Marine Corps Air Station with its 23,000 acres. This was not the easy answer, but it was the right one given topography, a large, flat area that can accommodate dual, 12,000-foot runways with proximity to San Diego's center.
Here is a different take on location. Military aircraft are not designed to be quiet, they are designed to optimize performance. Increased performance means increased thrust, which translates into increased noise. The newer military aircraft, such as the F/A-18, F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and V-22 Osprey, will be better performers, but noisier.
Commercial airplanes, on the other hand, are designed to be quiet. What kind of aircraft do you want near a highly populated area?
Military airfields are designed to support training young men and women in the art of air warfare, and they do that well. However, high-performance machines flown by fledgling aviators carrying live ordnance creates risks far greater than commercial air operations. While our military attempts to make every operation safe, stuff happens, and military operations entail a higher risk than commercial.
Practically, a commercial airport has to be located in or very near the city. Realistically, a military airfield should be in a lower-risk area where it can maximize safety, security and military operations. This means being located outside an urban area. What we have now is a juxtaposition. Thankfully we have some time to fix that.
But what about the Marines? The challenge that we have requires a two-part solution, for the civilian sector and for the military sector. The importance of dialogue ---- true dialogue ---- on this issue cannot be overstated.
About 80 miles east of San Diego lies a target-rich environment with a number of Marine facilities such as Yuma, Twentynine Palms, Barstow and Naval Air Station El Centro, which, combined with operations from Miramar, could be consolidated into a new master training facility with resulting cost reductions. Such a base could also be superior to Miramar and more in tune with Middle Eastern topography. With it could come increased safety, security and operational flexibility.
One of the obvious questions is, "Can we pull off this two-part story?" The answer is yes, but we have to do it together. What we need is a joint task force to examine the options and put together the strategy.
Meanwhile, on Nov. 7, it will be important to support the need for a meaningful conversation with our military on the airport issue.
Paul F. McCarthy is a retired Navy vice admiral, combat pilot, squadron, air wing, carrier commanding officer as well as a former commander of the Seventh Fleet. He also was an executive for McDonnell Douglas and Boeing, where he was involved with a number of aircraft programs, including the F/A-18, Joint Strike Fighter, V-22 and others.