Electronic voting safe, secure and monitored
By: BARBARA DUNMORE - Commentary | ∞
Election Day is the culmination of year-round planning and preparation by the registrar of voters' office to ensure the security of every ballot cast and the accuracy of every vote counted. A peek behind the scenes reveals the magnitude of the task of conducting a countywide election and the painstaking efforts to make sure every vote is counted correctly.
Riverside County has 755,000 registered voters. For the gubernatorial election, 605 polling places have been reserved and readied and over 2,400 poll workers have been trained to serve voters Election Day. Every volunteer and staff member takes the oath of allegiance to faithfully defend the electoral process through the conscientious execution of duties entrusted to them.
Prior to Election Day, 315 different ballot types were designed to capture 133 contests and 412 candidates across different political subdivisions across the county. These ballots must be printed for absentee voters and programmed into polling place voting units. Nearly 200,000 ballots are mailed out before Election Day to permanent absentee voters, mail ballot precincts, and military and overseas voters. About 50 percent of the remaining voters will go to polling places or early voting sites to cast their ballots.
Voters arriving at their polling places Election Day will encounter familiar touch-screen voting units used in Riverside County since November 2000. These units have been certified by the secretary of state's office for use in California and have been extensively tested and certified for accuracy by both federal and state agencies.
The voting system undergoes additional tests prior to each election to confirm the accuracy of ballot tabulating and reporting software and to ensure the voting units record every vote accurately. Riverside County's voting system proved 100 percent accurate in two state audits performed to test the system under actual voting conditions in 2004 and 2005.
Since January 2006, voters have been able to review a paper record copy of their ballots. The paper record, known as the "voter verified paper audit trail" stays with the voting unit as a check against the votes cast. After every election a visual inspection and manual count of at least 1 percent of the ballots cast is undertaken to verify computer-tallied results. Voters may also do their own independent verification by comparing the results posted outside each precinct (with the exception of schools and residences) with the results posted on the registrar of voters' Web site.
Elections demand seemingly dual objectives of speed and accuracy of ballot counting ---- however, both are actually delivered. Speed is achieved on election night when preliminary results are compiled from ballots cast at voting precincts and absentee ballots counted earlier in the day. Ballots from the desert and eastern Riverside County are transmitted over a secure county network from Indio to ensure those ballots are included in the preliminary results.
Accuracy is achieved is in the weeks following the election with a meticulous review and reconciliation of all votes cast. Typically, 10 to 20 percent of ballots cast remain to be counted after Election Day.
These include absentee ballots that were not received until Election Day and must be pre-processed before tabulation, including signature verification, prior to opening and counting the ballots; provisional ballots that require a voter's eligibility be researched and confirmation that the voter did not previously cast a ballot in the election; and write-in ballots that must be individually reviewed to determine whether or not the vote was cast for a qualified write-in candidate.
California law permits 28 days to complete the final official results.
The registrar of voters recognizes the importance of an open and transparent process. Members of the public, political parties, civic groups and the media are invited to observe all of the publicly conducted election processes. To make observation easier, the vote tabulation server was moved into the publicly viewable ballot-counting room. In addition, overhead cameras are being installed to improve pubic viewing of staff handling official election materials.
Managing a successful election is a major undertaking that requires skill, integrity, and nonpartisan commitment to public service. Through careful analysis, thorough testing of systems and continual training the registrar of voters' office consistently delivers seamless elections with assurance to voters that whether their vote is cast on paper or electronically, it remains secure and is counted as cast.
Barbara Dunmore is Riverside County's registrar of voters.
OUR VIEW: The people who occupy these local seats have as much or more impact on our lives as those in Sacramento and Washington.
Over the last few years, most of the city councils and school boards in Southwest County have shifted their elections from odd-numbered years to even, hoping to increase an ever-dwindling voter turnout.
Tuesday marks the first time in more than a decade that the bulk of these local races will be decided at the same time voters choose who will lead us in the state Capitol, governor's mansion and Congress.
While the change should result in more people deciding who will be leading these important local agencies, some election watchers also fear voter "overload" ---- ballots with so many races and propositions on them that voters simply tune out and skip the bottom part.
Saturday, we recapped our recommendations on the state ballot propositions. Today, we recap our endorsements in key local races. But whether you follow our recommendations or not, we urge you to vote. The people who occupy these local seats have as much or more impact on our lives as those in Sacramento and Washington.
Murrieta City Council: Whoever wins, with only one of three incumbents seeking re-election, the council will take on a new personality, but this is no time for inexperience. We recommend re-electing Rick Gibbs, who has been a solid leader in his first 18 months in office, and adding Randon Lane and Gary Thomasian to the council. While their philosophies do not align perfectly, both men have demonstrated a strong history of community involvement and deep commitment to Murrieta.
Temecula City Council: In what is probably the quietest election in the city's relatively short history, there seems little reason to change course now. Longtime incumbents Ron Roberts and Jeff Comerchero have helped make the city what it is, and while she is new to the council, Maryann Edwards has served the community well as a tireless volunteer, school board member and councilwoman. She deserves to be elected to a full term.
Lake Elsinore City Council: For the first time in a long time, Lake Elsinore is headed in the right direction, and incumbents Thomas Buckley and Daryl Hickman deserve a lot of the credit. Both men should be given a second term to help make sure the city stays on course.
Temecula Valley Unified School District: A tumultuous couple of years have tarnished the image of this otherwise strong district, but the recent settlement of longstanding union battles and hiring of a new superintendent have quieted things substantially. The board needs to be a little better about communicating with parents and teachers, but the blame for recent breakdowns is hardly theirs alone. Incumbent trustees Bob Brown and Rick Shafer bring a good mix of experience and leadership to bear, and should be re-elected. With her history of involvement in schools and connection to parents, longtime PTA leader and school volunteer Susan Elliott makes an ideal addition to the board.
Lake Elsinore Unified School District: Lake Elsinore schools have some issues to work out, but some new programs designed to boost the district's more challenging students and a popular new superintendent have it moving in a positive direction. Both incumbents, Sonja Wilson and Tom Thomas, have long and distinctive histories of community involvement and should be re-elected. Chamber of Commerce President Kim Joseph Cousins is just as committed to bettering the schools and can help strengthen ties between the schools and the business community to the betterment of all.
Menifee Union School District: Growth and "unification" ---- the merger of the elementary district with the area's high school district ---- are on this district's front burners, but the board can't lose sight of the reason they exist, either. The two incumbents have served the community well and should be re-elected. A straight-shooter, Rita Peters has some rough edges, but she's the best advocate around for kids, especially those most in danger of falling through the cracks. Bob O'Donnell brings decades of experience and understanding of bureaucratic process to the board and can help the district navigate the complex and necessary unification process.
More Stories
Advertisement
Disbelief wrote on Nov 5, 2006 12:29 PM:The poll workers take an oath -- so did Duke Cunningham and other abusers of the public trust. Big deal! The registrar claims members of the public can "observe all of the publicly conducted election processes." This suggest there are privately conducted election processes, when the process needs to be totally transparent. Finally, the equipment does NOT go through any thorough independent testing -- the voting machine companies fund the testing companies and limit the scope of investigation -- it's just like the favorable air emission studies Granite Construction pays for to make their project look acceptable to the public.
Jeremiah wrote on Nov 5, 2006 1:31 PM:Yet again Dunmore misleads the public about the security of these machines. Dunmore claims that the software is tested and certified by federal and state agencies. To start, there is no federal agency that does any testing of these machines. The state testing does not include testing of the complete system, third party components of the system do not get any testing. Read the voting systems standards and this becomes clear. Dunmore also misleads the public by saying that the system undergoes additional tests prior to each election. These so called Logic and Accuracy Tests are done in a special test mode. After the test are complete and before the machines are used in an election, Dunmore has her staff change the settings on the voting machines. Leaving out this fact makes it seem like Dunmore is testing the machines as they are used in elections.
Diane wrote on Nov 5, 2006 9:42 PM:When Riverside County began to use electronic voting systems, I welcomed them, seeing their advantages to the voters and to counting accuracy. I viewed complainers as Luddites who were suspicious of all modernity, and discounted their critcism. For this election, I have been appointed to the county Election Observer Panel, and I have been very disappointed to learn that the critics are correct - electronic voting machines currently in use are too susceptible to tampering and abuse. Additionally, I take issue with Ms. Dunmore's claim that anyone may view the counting of the vote, as required by law. The main voting tabulation takes place in a room which observers may view only from behind glass windows, which are placed so that observers cannot actually see what is happening. Our polite protests have been treated with disdain and/or completely ignored. There is an inherent conflict between the need for transparency and the need for security, but these needs can be balanced. So far, this is not happening at the Riverside County Registrar's office.
Cheryl wrote on Nov 6, 2006 2:42 AM:Recently on CNN, DeForest Soaries, the former chair of the Election Assistance Commission said, regarding the electronic voting machines, "Today six years later after spending $2.5 billion, we don't know what we don't know. We don't know about security, we don't know enough because the EAC never got enough money for research. The Congress passed a law that authorized $30 billion for research. EAC to this date has received zero of those dollars.... The Republican-led Congress and the Republican White House have failed. And what Ray and I were invited to do was really a charade. And I think the public, as Ray said, should be outraged and demand results from the local to the federal level." So: Is it possible that the Riverside County Registrar of Voters is unaware that she has been lied to, and so she is lying to all of us, about the testing of the electronic voting equipment? If the people "in charge" at the TOP confess that the security is questionable, why on earth is the registrar insisting that this equipment is safe and secure? I just witnessed a so-called Logic and Accuracy test on Sequoia equipment, which was nothing more than a simple computer driven drill, and bore no resemblance to an actual voting day scenario. This does not give me confidence in our elections. We need a red team test, at the very least.
Ellen wrote on Nov 6, 2006 6:52 AM:No federal agency tests the machines. They undergo testing by independent agencies hired by the vendors in a confidential contract. Experts agree the testing and certification process is hopelessly inadequate, and this fact has been demonstrated over and over. Virtually all the hundreds of malfunctions across the country have occurred on certified equipment. Pre-election testing, even if it were done in election mode, is conducted by people who have no experience in software testing -- like having a light-bulb salesman check the electrical wiring in your house.
Jerry wrote on Nov 6, 2006 7:52 AM:Barbara Dunmore uses "secure" in the title, and then writes about tests for accuracy, but not about tests for security. Why not? I've been present at presentations by both state and federal certifiers. Neither claims to test for security. In most (all?) contracts, the electronic voting machine contracts prohibit purchasers from testing for security. In two instances where testing was done, all sorts of problems were found; and then there were concerted efforts to get the Registars, Bruce Funk in Utah, Ion Sancho in Florida, fired. Test for security and you get sued and/or fired. Why? There are already reports of machines flipping votes in this election in other states - so much for accuracy. We need to switch to paper ballots with touchscreens or other accessibility aids for the disabled. These are more accurate, trustworthy, and secure than electronic voting machines, and also much cheaper to purchase, house, distribute, and maintain.
Doug wrote on Nov 6, 2006 8:11 AM:What is not said is often more important than what is said. In the June primary Barbara Dunmore and her staff could not explain why the Statement of vote showed 1400 more votes counted by the central tablulator than the number of voters who where recoreded as having voted in the voter registration database. The fact is the accuracy of voting counting is usally about 1% off. Barbara never tell the public this. You can find more details on Black box voting voter tool kint moudule 7.
John wrote on Nov 6, 2006 8:54 AM:As long as electronic voting machine software remains "proprietary," that is owned by the manufacturers and kept secret, voters can have no confidence in the election process. (As noted above, testing is done by "laboratories" paid by the manufacturers, their clients.) And when the president of Diebold declares that he will "Deliver Ohio for Bush," that is not just a boast, it is a warning to e-voters nationwide.
Arthur wrote on Nov 6, 2006 1:15 PM:The principle of elections in the United States is that votes are cast in secret and tabulated in public. Voting machines whose inner workings are trade secrets is incompatible with this principle. See the Guest Opinion on November 1 in the PA Weekly (see ...) for more details about open source in electronic voting.
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (10463)
- TEMECULA: Protesters line intersection (6482)
- ESCONDIDO: 3 DUI arrests, 46 impounds at checkpoint (5254)
- ESCONDIDO: Border Patrol employee in custody after hatchet attack (5003)
- ESCONDIDO: City's dreams of an 'upscale' downtown may be dying (4895)
- HOUSING: Local median price up for third straight month (45)
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (44)
- FALLBROOK: Peruvian chocolatier living sweet American dream (29)
- ESCONDIDO: Border Patrol employee in custody after hatchet attack (28)
- ESCONDIDO: Victim's roommate recalls July 4 shooting, friends gather for vigil (27)
Advertisement




