Attorney says agents made up assault case evidence

By: MARK WALKER - Staff Writer | Friday, January 12, 2007 10:07 PM PST

CAMP PENDLETON ---- A hearing for a Marine officer accused of assaulting an Iraqi was halted Friday after a defense attorney alleged that Naval Criminal Investigative Service agents fabricated portions of statements that led to the charges against the lieutenant.

Attorney David Sheldon made the assertion in a Camp Pendleton courtroom on the second day of an Article 32 hearing for 2nd Lt. Nathan Phan. The Sacramento-area native is charged with assaulting three Iraqis and filing a false report in an incident that took place on April 10 in Hamdania, Iraq.

Sheldon's allegation prompted the hearing officer, Lt. Col William Pigott, to order a halt to the proceedings until the three government agents could be brought to court to testify.

"I want to hear from these agents," Pigott said, ordering a recess in the hearing until an as-yet-to-be determined date when all the parties can be present in the courtroom.

The development came during the midpoint of testimony from Lance Cpl. Christopher Faulkner, a member of the platoon that the 26-year-old Phan commanded in Iraq last year.

Faulkner testified that a statement the Marine Corps' Navy law enforcement agency attributed to him contained falsehoods. The key inaccuracy, he said, was including language that said he saw Phan placing an unloaded pistol into the mouth of one of the alleged victims. In fact, Faulkner testified, he never saw that occur and never told agents that it had.

Phan's defense team also introduced a signed affidavit from Faulkner stating that he merely saw Phan in a room with a detainee and that the lieutenant was leaning against a wall as the men were being questioned.

During a break in the hearing, Sheldon approached Pigott and said he had reason to believe the government agents were lying.

"We believe in good faith that there has been misconduct on the part of NCIS agents," Sheldon said. He added that when the agents take the stand, he wants the hearing officer to read them their constitutional rights when they are sworn in, suggesting they may have committed criminal misconduct in preparation of the statements that the government is using against Phan.

Those statements were taken from several members of a Kilo Company platoon that Phan commanded in Hamdania. The assault case was lodged against Phan as a result of the investigation into the shooting death of a retired Iraqi police officer on April 26. Sheldon said that in addition to Faulkner's statements, those of two other Marines contain falsehoods, and that they have filed signed affidavits to that effect.

"It's hard to believe that three unrelated Marines who have no relation to Lt. Phan or the alleged misconduct would fabricate this kind of allegation," Sheldon said.

Phan is not accused of having any role in the homicide case, which has led to guilty pleas from three Camp Pendleton Marines and the Navy corpsman from the platoon attached to 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment. Four other Marines are awaiting courts-martial in the case.

During his testimony, Faulkner said the original statement he signed was typed by Naval Criminal Investigative Service agents who came to him several days after it was made and asked that he sign it. Faulkner, who is not accused of any wrongdoing, said he was on guard duty at the time and only had a few minutes to review the document and never read all of its contents.

Under questioning from Maj. Donald Plowman, the lead prosecutor in the Phan case, Faulkner said his amended version was given to Phan's attorneys in November and represented the truth of what he knew.

Sheldon told the court that he intends to call two other Marines who will testify that their statements prepared by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service agents also contained information, damaging to Phan, that they will say they never told the agents.

Two of those agents are in Georgia and one is in North Carolina and were not available to testify Friday.

An agent who did testify, Kelly Garbo, told the court that she assisted in the interrogation of Phan in Iraq in May and that the Navy and Marine Corps' law enforcement agency never puts falsehoods in the official statements it provides prosecutors.

But Garbo also said when asked by Sheldon that she had never read her agency's manual on how to conduct interrogations.

That statement, along with the defense's assertion that agents fabricated part of the statements being used against Phan, are serious enough to warrant the appointment of a special counsel to look at how the agency does its job, Sheldon said after the hearing.

"This raises the specter of serious misconduct," Sheldon said.

On Thursday, two Marines testified that they took part in beating one of the men Phan is accused of assaulting, but said the lieutenant wasn't in the home where that incident took place.

Lance Cpl. Saul Lopezromo, who was granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for his testimony, and Pvt. Jerry Shumate Jr. said Phan was sitting in a Humvee parked about 200 yards away from the home of the beating victim.

Marine Corps officials on Thursday said that victim, a former Iraqi intelligence officer named Khalid Hamad Daham, is one of four Iraqis that the government is attempting to bring to Camp Pendleton to testify in the Hamdania assault and homicide cases.

There are four remaining defendants in the homicide case, including two men charged along with Phan in the assault case, Sgt. Lawrence Hutchins III and Cpl. Trent Thomas.

Besides assault, Phan also is charged with making a false statement, an allegation that contends he reported to his commanders that one of the alleged assault victims had been released from custody when in fact he had not.

Sheldon said the government has failed to produce any evidence supporting that charge.

If convicted of the charges he faces today, Phan could be sentenced to as much as 28 years in prison and a dishonorable discharge. When the hearing concludes, Pigott will issue a recommendation to Lt. Gen. James N. Mattis, commander of the I Marine Expeditionary Force, as to whether he believes Phan should be court-martialed.

Contact staff writer Mark Walker at (760) 740-3529 or mlwalker@nctimes.com.

12 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

mark wrote on Jan 13, 2007 10:14 AM:Misconduct on the part of NCIS investigators, what a surprise development. Next you'll be reporting that water is wet.

Imature Agents wrote on Jan 13, 2007 6:38 PM:Please! Put these investigation back into the hands of the U.S Marine Corps Criminal Investigations Division CID. These Navy civilians do not have clue! Let Marines police Marines! At least when they investigate they do not create stuff that isn't there!

If it was a civilian defendant wrote on Jan 13, 2007 8:07 PM:If it was a civilian defendant "Mark" and "Immature Agents" would be complaining about defense attorneys posturing, and ranting about how cops don't lie. HYPOCRISY AT WORK

All things Considered wrote on Jan 14, 2007 3:57 AM:I do believe there were mistakes made by the NCIS in the way it has handeled the case, obviously one can not count on their reports when they have not read the interrogation procedure manual. I there for conclude anything in their report is suspect and should be looked into further as such, should it be found there were fabrications injected in these reports then criminal charges should be brought up on the NCIS investigators that wrote those reports. As for whether or not I beleieve the allegations against Lt. Phan are true is irrelevant as I was not there to see the alleged incidents he has been charged with commiting. Besides all of that why is it we have these fighting yes FIGHTING Men and Women trained is it to sit on their hands, to hesitate in combat situations to look over their shoulders hoping to god some dumb news jocky who is not trained to look for the things our forces are trained for writes a news report that causes our forces even more harm. Maybe the journalist should train along side of our forces go through the hell they are put through be trained to look for the same things our forces are trained to look for, perhaps this should also apply to all military criminal investigation teams it might help them all spot the truth alot faster.

AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Jan 14, 2007 2:10 PM:Shades of the Duke LaCrosse players Persecution, and look how that turned out. Kelly Garbo; the agent who seemed so proud of herself and couldn't wait to let the world know "she" caused a Marine to break and cry. There is no honor or justice in that. She should be hanging her head in shame.If these accusations by the defense hold true, then how about the interrogation of the P8 who have been saying they were coerced? If proven guilty of these accusations, an inept, rush to judgment investigative team, has ruined the reputations and lives of these Marines and their families, caused them undue pain and suffering, and forced them into financial ruin. There is no way to not have a huge reasonable doubt about the charges made by the prosecution. These Marines should be reinstated and get back their pay and benefits. Excuse me for asking but, aren't Marines "supposed" to chase down insurgents? How can they be expected to not fight them; they are the enemy!!! Gee! Who would expect that in a WAR our troops might have to chase and fight the enemy? What was it the mentors and leaders of these Marines taught and drilled into them for months, and encouraged them to do? To become warriors!!! Does anyone believe that the insurgents who were chased just gave up and didn't fight? Give us all a break. These NCIS investigators should join Mr. Nifong in his practice. They seem to have the qualifications he would require.

AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Jan 14, 2007 2:15 PM: Daham; One of the so-called witnesses being brought to the U.S.is a former Iraqi Intelligence Officer. Oh wow! That instills confidence doesn't it?

Harry wrote on Jan 14, 2007 2:25 PM: I have always been against the news media being allowed in a combat area. With the cell phones and communication skills evolved today,the enemy can get information even before we do. I feel that all combat communiques should go through a military censor before being sent. This was a practice in WW2. All these accusations done by news media are harmfull to the American cause,. SEMPER FI & GOD BLESS our troops

Dennis wrote on Jan 14, 2007 2:44 PM:This appears to be another judgment by the press or cicilian antimilitary investigators. Apparently our troops are not performing "politcally correct" actions! Why would any of our servicemen want to serve in combat for a Nation just waiting to try and convict them of ANY action under fire??!! yes, I've served three years in the Army, but never would again serve(or encourage others!)in this politicaly correct Nation!!

AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Jan 14, 2007 6:20 PM:Dittos Harry and Dennis. Harry, my hubby has been complaining from the get-go about the military not being allowed to censor all information reported to the public. I like seeing video of what's going on but NOT to the detriment of the troops. To Dennis: Thanks for being there for us when you served. It's so sad to see how they're treating our troops today; all the while professing to care. AW4.

sailor4321 wrote on Jan 14, 2007 10:31 PM:I agree with the defense attorney: there needs to be an investigation in how NCIS does its work.

Good Job NCIS wrote on Jan 22, 2007 7:00 AM:It would seem with hind sight that they did a fine job at uncovering the facts of this atrocity! So far 5 of the 8 have confessed and the confessions seem to confirm that they killed Awad, just as it is charged, and that they knew it was unjustified, and that they conspired to cover their tracks. Don't shoot the messenger.

A friend in TN wrote on Aug 23, 2007 8:48 PM:To SA Garbo - you go girl!!

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, email addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos