Congressman pushes for land transfer for Pechangas

By: NICOLE SACK - Staff Writer | Saturday, January 20, 2007 11:07 PM PST

TEMECULA ---- For the third year in a row, U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa will try to push a bill through Congress transferring nearly 1,200 acres of federal land into the control of the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians.

Issa, R-Temecula, introduced the legislation at the start of the legislative session that would take three separate parcels out of the control of the Bureau of Land Management and add them to the existing 5,500 acres of the Pechanga Reservation. The Pechangas say the land holds cultural and historical importance to the tribe. The bill would put the areas into the care of the tribe for conservation and preservation.

The bill, H.R. 28, has no co-sponsors.

"The area contains sacred rock carvings and is a key part of the Tribe's watershed," Pechanga Tribal Chairman Mark Macarro wrote in an e-mail. "We will continue to work with Congressman Issa to protect the land and cultural sites for future generations."

A group of disenrolled Pechanga members ousted from the tribe in 2004 are voicing opposition to the bill, however, saying the tribe has been a violator of human and civil rights, and should not benefit from the public trust.

John Gomez Jr. of Temecula was one of the 130 adults who were disenrolled from the tribe in 2004 after their lineage was questioned. The group unsuccessfully sued requesting a state judge order the tribe to continue their membership.

"We are Temecula Indians, they never said we weren't. They just got rid of us," Gomez said.

He said the proposed bill would further remove the group of disenrolled tribe members from the culturally important properties by placing some of the ancestral lands that contain burial sites under the sole control of the Pechangas.

"By saying one group should have control of those sites, we don't think that is proper. We want to ensure we have access to those areas. Just because a small group got rid of us doesn't mean we don't still have ties to those sites."

Gomez said that if there is going to be a land transfer there should be a hearing on the issue to better educate Issa and other members of Congress about the complexities that exist among all the members, present and former, of the tribe.

"All we want is the ability to tell the story as to why the Pechanga Band, because of their actions, should not be the sole beneficiary of this transfer and that we have an interest and ties to those sites. We would hope that Congress would listen to us."

Frederick Hill, Issa's press secretary, said Gomez's concerns are unrelated to the land transfer bill ---- even thought Gomez said the issues are clearly intertwined.

"Bureau of Land Management actually approached our office and indicated they had these parcels of land to which they had no use for. They indicated the land may have historical importance to the Pechanga Tribe," Hill said. "The Pechanga Tribe was interested in having these lands added to their trust."

There is no land cost associated with the transfer, Hill said, because the land isn't being sold, but is instead, "just being transferred from one entity of the federal government to another."

The Bureau of Land Management manages 261.8 million acres of surface land primarily in 12 western states. The three parcels of land Issa is proposing to turn over to the tribe total 1,197 total acres and are undevelopable.

The largest parcel is a 971-acre area just west of the current Pechanga reservation. The rugged land is covered with a dense mix of oak woodlands, chaparral and coastal sage scrub. The slopes throughout the parcel are steep and eroded.

A second 200-acre area that sits to the northeast of the reservation has also been identified as surplus land by the Bureau of Land Management. The last parcel is 19.83 acres in an isolated area just south of Sun City and contains burial sites of high importance to the tribe, Hill said.

In November 2005, the tribe entered into a memorandum of understanding with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Land Management that states the Pechangas will manage the lands for conservation purposes.

Issa introduced similar legislation both in 2004 and 2005. Last year's bill was passed by the house, but died in a Senate committee. The current version on the bill has been referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Contact staff writer Nicole Sack at (951) 676-4315, Ext. 2616 or nsack@thecalifornian.com.

Next Previous

Advertisement

9 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

Randy wrote on Jan 21, 2007 4:52 AM:How much money has Pechanga contributed to Congressman Darryl Issa the last few years?

Randy wrote on Jan 21, 2007 8:40 AM:If Issa's bill failed to pass the Republican-controlled Congress the last two years, what chance will it have before this year's Democrat-controlled Congress?

Randy wrote on Jan 21, 2007 10:08 AM:I'm also wondering. Maybe it should be given to the County and developed as hiking/nature trails.

benny wrote on Jan 21, 2007 10:19 AM:Like Randy I’m also curious to know how much money Pechanga contributed to Congressman Darryl Issa. Something seems fishy with this story. Under the right circumstances a land transfer to the Pechanga Band would not be a bad thing per se, but the fact that Darryl Issa is somehow involved makes me think that there's some kind of corruption going on. I don't think Mr Issa can be trusted. I'm sure if we follow the money trail we’ll find the answer.

Gary in Winchester wrote on Jan 21, 2007 10:37 AM:Good question Randy,.. I think that is information which is avalible to the public.

stipulation wrote on Jan 21, 2007 11:02 AM:There needs to be a stipulation, if this happens, that the land remain undisturbed. Just because it is rugged doesn't mean there won't be some way of a developer to rip it up at a good price to Pechanga if they get greedy one day.

General Disarray wrote on Jan 21, 2007 11:44 PM:You are paranoid. Issa is involved because it requires a Congressional Act to transfer these lands and he is their Congressman. I'm certain they have contributed to his campaign, but you will find it is an insignificant portion of his warchest over the years.

Zygo wrote on Jan 22, 2007 11:45 AM:Question. If the land is transferred, will the public still have the right to enjoy it? Or, will the land be fenced off only for use by the enrolled members of the tribe?

Patrick wrote on Jul 24, 2007 1:12 PM:Just to provide a bit more information, the land would be very difficult to use, and I beleive that part of this agreement would include a memorandum of understanding with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Land Management that states the Pechangas will manage the lands for conservation purposes only. Meaning they would not be able to develop it. Regarding the discussion of non-Indians using the land; the largest portions of land are on the side of the mountains which have little or no road access to, and if non-Indians wanted to use the land they would have to either hike across the tribes land or climb the backside of the mountain.

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos