Forest closure targets golden eagles
By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | ∞
RANCHO BERNARDO ---- U.S. Forest Service officials are proposing the first closure of three areas of the Cleveland National Forest to all recreation in winter and spring to avoid disturbing golden eagles and prairie falcons during nesting season.
Although the eagles and falcons aren't in danger of extinction, in San Diego County their numbers have plummeted. And officials say they want to restore those populations by keeping climbers, hikers and others from disturbing the birds while they raise their young.
But climbers and hikers say they try to avoid disturbing the birds and can't understand why the Forest Service wants to keep them out.
Forest officials are proposing to declare three prime nesting areas ---- Eagle Peak and Rock Mountain near Ramona, and Corte Madera Mountain east of Alpine ---- off-limits to backcountry recreation from December to May. In each of the areas, which are several hundred acres in size, birds have built nests high up on the steep cliffs, said Joan Wynn, a spokeswoman for the Cleveland forest in Rancho Bernardo, in an interview last week.
"There aren't any established trails and roads in these areas," Wynn said. "It's all backcountry area. It's not anything that is developed."
However, all of the locations are good rock climbing areas, local climbers say. And the proposed Eagle Peak closure east of Ramona takes in the popular Three Sisters hiking area with its scenic waterfall that often roars in spring.
"I was just out there (Thursday) for the day," said Kevin Worrall, a 51-year-old La Jolla resident who has been climbing since he was 13. "And it really sunk in how much there is to lose."
Worrall said he is bothered by the thought of being shut out of the area half the year.
"It's a place that is relatively easily accessible, in that it is an hour and a half drive from the coastal communities," he said. "And, basically, it is a place where you can find a totally natural environment and experience the land in its native, pristine state. It's just good for the soul to know that it's out there."
While the restriction is only a proposal at this point, it could take effect as early as this spring, Wynn said.
Golden eagles are year-round residents of San Diego County. But over the last 100 years, their numbers have been reduced by half, from an estimated 108 pairs a century ago to 53, Wynn said. Human disturbance and habitat destruction is blamed for the decline.
"We're trying to take care of the ones that we have left," she said. "We don't want the population to continue to decline to where we don't have any golden eagles at all."
Prairie falcons are even more scarce in San Diego County, with an estimated 20 to 30 pairs, she said.
Tom Stephan of Ramona, acting president of the California Raptor Advancement Group, a conservation organization, praised the proposal.
"They have my endorsement, that's for sure. It's been a long time in coming," he said.
Stephan said most backcountry visitors do not disturb the birds.
"People walking down below them at the base of cliffs aren't going to bother them," he said. "It's rock climbing that is 99 percent of the problem. They (the birds) demand seclusion. They demand isolation. And they can't get it if people are climbing around their nests."
Wynn said the presence of humans nearby can stress the birds and result in nests being abandoned.
Worrall challenged the suggestion that rock climbers are largely the reason why raptors become stressed. He said climbers are careful to avoid nests, and most of the nests tend to be on ledges.
"Climbers want to be out on the more open, exposed faces," Worrall said.
As for his beloved Eagle Peak, "We've never ever flushed a bird out of any roost or nest out there," he said.
Worrall suggested the Forest Service could trim the Eagle Peak closure area by as little as 10 percent and still protect the birds without eliminating climbing and hiking in the area.
Steve Matous, executive director for the Boulder, Colo.-based climbing group Access Fund, said the proposed closure could set a disturbing precedent because the birds are not federally protected under the Endangered Species Act.
"That does not mean that we want to kill the birds," Matous said. "But this doesn't sound like a reasonable closure to us."
The Forest Service is taking comments through the end of this month.
It said that comments may be sent by e-mail to kwinter@fs.fed.us or through the post office to: Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest, 10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, No. 200, San Diego, CA 92127. Mailed comments must be postmarked by Jan. 31.
Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 740-5442 or ddowney@nctimes.com. Comment at nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Esco Local wrote on Jan 21, 2007 10:05 PM:If it helps to save the species, I'd definitely not mind going elsewhere for recreation.
Ben wrote on Jan 22, 2007 5:12 AM:This is a great plan and should be implemented immediately! The rock climbers have many options available to enjoy their sport, where the Eagles and Falcons only have a few instincts in regards to nesting habits. Although I do not believe the climbers want to harm the birds just their presence in the area is all it takes. Please protect these great animals.
Reardon wrote on Jan 22, 2007 12:26 PM:Esco Local and Ben have homes built on what was once pristine wild land. They could return their land to its pristine condition in a day with a bulldozer, and in just a few years the land would revert to open space with no sign of human activity, and become a wildlife refuge! That would be the right thing to do for anyone concerned with wildlife, and human impact on the environment. Light a candle and set an example...
to Reardon wrote on Jan 22, 2007 6:46 PM:and you live where? In a cave? All of the US was once pristine. RB, Poway, Peñasquitos, no matter where you live it once was pristine wild land.....
As a Climber . . wrote on Jan 22, 2007 7:26 PM:I know that there there is a huge climbing resource in Southern California. San Diego County alone has some of the best bouldering in the world. I know Kevin Worrall and i respect his ethics, I hope he goes along with this, it is a small sacrifice the climbing community can make. unlike the off-roaders, climbers do much more to protect natural resources. Lets set the example, ON ELAY!!!
Oh Stop wrote on Jan 22, 2007 7:43 PM:If rock climbers are the problem, then why cut off ALL recreation in the areas??
Reardon wrote on Jan 22, 2007 8:52 PM:Right! That is why I support development (generally), do not call for retaining vast areas for set asides. most of the County of San Diego is owned by city, state, and federal governments -- making buildable land rare and driving up the cost of land and driving down the "affordable housing." As to the beautiful golden eagle, I was in Alaska last year and that state is awash in golden eagles. You can find 100 in a single tree!
As an off-roader... wrote on Jan 22, 2007 9:14 PM:...I resent the unfounded assertion that we do not take care of our recreation spaces. Climber, when was the last time you and your buddies hauled 5, 40' long roll-off dumpsters of trash out of your recreation areas? I helped accomplish this just over a year ago and I always leave with 3-4 bags full of trash that I pick up whenever hit the trails. We all have to 'pack it in, pack it out' to keep our open spaces open! Once open space is closed, it's VERY tough to get it re-opened.
Oh Stop??? wrote on Jan 22, 2007 9:17 PM:READ READ READ, who said rock climbers were a problem? it said that rock climbers were a user of the area, along with hikers
Ben to Reardon wrote on Jan 23, 2007 5:15 AM:I usually agree with you BUT this time we disagree. The closure is only for 6 months a year and on very limited areas. Those cliffs could not be developed without tremendous expense (think Cowles Mountain) anyway and as stated there are many many places to climb in San Diego. As far as the eagles go, I would rather stay in San Diego to see them rather then go to Alaska, where oh by the way, there numbers are shrinking because of man also. The rock climbers are people that do little damage to the enviroment and I am pretty sure won't mind this small concession to nature!
Oh Stop wrote on Jan 23, 2007 11:23 AM:Paragraph 17 reads that rock climbing is 99 percent of the problem. READ READ READ.
Keli wrote on Jan 28, 2007 11:17 AM:This issue is much bigger than a few nests here in San Diego or climbing. Please remember these are NOT endangered or threatened animal species. There is no evidence that recreational uses are impacting the raptors. The closure of public land by federal land managaement agencies is an extreme measure that should only be initiated through clear legal authority and documented scientific need. Please read the proposals and read between the lines. Prairie falcon populations in SD are stable, why initiate a closure that would close hundreds of acres of public land to ALL forms of recreational use? This is an unnecessary closure.
- Burst pipe causes 70-foot-deep sink hole in Carlsbad (2466)
- REGION: State green power plan will cost consumers billions (1444)
- HOUSING: Fraud victims struggle to regain cash, credit (1399)
- REGION: Talk of new immigration bill gets mixed reaction (1053)
- VISTA: Grocer brothers suspected of threatening former butcher (1033)
Advertisement
Videos
Advertisement




