Oceanside's Feller wrong to seek toll-road reversal
By: FRED M. ROBERTS JR. - Commentary | ∞
In "Feller seeks city support for toll road" (North County Times, Jan. 27), Oceanside Councilman Jack Feller would like the city of Oceanside to reconsider its vote to oppose the proposed path of the Orange County Southern Foothill Toll Road. This proposed toll road would run through the Donna O'Neill Land Conservancy and San Onofre State Park to link up with Interstate 5.
The city was right to oppose this toll road path and should let the vote stand. While the state park is outside of the city's jurisdiction, it is available to all the people of Oceanside as a marvelous recreation opportunity for swimming, surfing, hiking and camping.
Each of us has some responsibility if we want to keep our state parks intact. The state did not set aside this land for future road alignments; it was designated for recreation and conservation. The Orange County Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA) was arrogant to assume that these open lands were set aside for their road. What we would lose is irreplaceable, and there is some debate whether the toll road would actually produce the traffic relief TCA claims, and for how long, given the area's plan for 14,000 new homes.
Recreation sites are becoming fewer and more crowded as California's population grows. Reducing opportunities in neighboring areas will only hurt the city's citizens. TCA had alignment alternatives that could have been adopted. TCA has used agreements with the county to block competition or other roads that would have alleviated freeway congestion.
The state park is the wrong place for the toll road. State parks are not road easements. The TCA spokesperson tells us the road would be 400 feet from the campsites. That certainly would detract from the nature experience and eliminate any sense of getting away from it all.
TCA also points out few people use the backcountry the road would ruin. However, the backcountry is the center piece of park conservation, with nearly a dozen endangered species. The toll road would have far-reaching implications on conservation elsewhere.
In the case of Oceanside, we have significant populations of thread-leaved brodiaea, a state and federally listed plant. Part of current statewide conservation strategy assumes the populations in San Onofre State Park are protected. If they are not, the conservation status of this species would have to be re-examined in Oceanside. Likely more would have to be done to protect Oceanside's plants, which would mean less flexibility in planning and development.
This argument would apply in many places where rare plants and animals rely, at least in part, on occurrences already "protected" in San Onofre State Park. We can't both use them as shiny examples of conservation and drive over them. I hope Councilman Feller visits the park and reconsiders his position. Maybe then he would see that the TCA is trying to rob present and future Californians of a valuable piece of the state's natural heritage.
Oceanside resident Fred Roberts is the rare plant coordinator for the San Diego chapter of the California Native Plant Society.
More Stories
So true wrote on Feb 3, 2007 12:46 PM:This writer knows his stuff. Don't touch our park! Find an alternative to the proposal. Thank you Mackin for protecting our State Parks, as for Feller, grow up.
Feller is right, environmentalist is wrong. wrote on Feb 3, 2007 3:24 PM:A toll road is going through clear to the Mexican border whether the Oceanside City Council endorses it or not. Period. Same sort of objections were voice in Orange County and points north, but the toll road went through regardless. It's in the master plan folks. The writer of the community forum piece would rather protect the speckled river rat and the web toed owl than have a toll road benefiting millions of people. We'd still be living in caves if the environmentalists had their way.
Todd T. Cardiff wrote on Feb 5, 2007 9:07 AM:The Donna O'Neill Land Conservancy was set aside in perpetuity as mitigation for the impacts of the Talega Development. San Mateo Campgrounds was set aside as mitigation for coastal impacts caused by the San Onofre Nuclear Generator Station. These are public lands. Let us not give away our state resources to satisfy the bond holders (ie., Wall Street investors)
Traffic Relief Now! wrote on Feb 5, 2007 2:00 PM:95% of those who use the San Onofre State Park use the beach campgrounds, which will not be impacted in the least by the Toll Roads. Oh, and by the way, it's NOT state land... it's federal land owned by the Marines who are fine with Foothill-South and have been since it was put on the map of roads to be built back in 1981. We need roads to provide traffic relief. The sooner it's built, the better.
won't relieve traffic wrote on Feb 5, 2007 2:38 PM:Even OCTA says the tollroad won't make a difference for traffic on the 5. If it's built the taxpayers will be charged twice as much to widen the 5, which will have to be done anyways. Don't build the tollroad, it limits our options, and kills the park. By the way, the San Mateo Campground is fully booked 9 months in advance and is open year round, unlike Trails. Your 95% number is dead wrong.
Traffic Relief Now! wrote on Feb 5, 2007 4:02 PM:Every OCTA study of Orange County traffic ASSUMES Foothill-South will be built. And as for widening the I-5... that would mean the demolition of more than 1,000 homes and businesses... Are going door to door to tell them, or should I? And the cost to widen the I-5 is estimated at about $2.5 billion. Since widening the I-5 wasn't part of the new Measure M plan, you'll have to tell me where that money is coming from. The Toll Roads are paid for by those who use them... as it should be!
I-5 will be widened anyways wrote on Feb 8, 2007 1:24 PM:OCTA says that the 5 will have to be widened despite building the toll road, only it will cost twice as much because of non-compete clause. Why not just widen it now so we can get a bargain and relieve the traffic for real? Toll Roads thrive on bad traffic on free roads. They don't relieve anything...
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement

