Power line could affect climate change fight
By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | ∞
NORTH COUNTY ---- While thousands of San Diego County residents have decried the controversial wires atop 150-foot poles that would stamp a large set of footprints across the landscape, some students of energy policy say the $1.3 billion project may help fight global warming.
But project opponents are skeptical that the proposed Sunrise Powerlink actually would deliver clean, renewable power, much less contribute to the state's emerging campaign to combat climate change.
David Hogan, a spokesman for the environmental group Center for Biological Diversity in San Diego, argues that there are so many doubts about a proposed massive solar project in the Southern California desert that it is doubtful the power line would make any dent in greenhouse gases at all.
"Global warming is real and the Powerlink is only going to make things worse," Hogan said. "San Diego Gas & Electric's claims that the Powerlink will benefit renewables is a self-serving lie."
Like the other major California utilities that serve vast urban regions, the utility is obligated by state law to deliver 20 percent of its electricity from sources such as solar and wind power, which are much cleaner than burning coal and natural gas, by 2010. And the proposed power line is probably the best bet for reaching that goal, people who study energy policy say.
"If it brings in lots of renewables, then, of course, it helps advance the cause," said Scott Anders, director of the Energy Policy Initiatives Center at the University of San Diego.
In keeping with another new law, the California Public Utilities Commission last month passed a regulation that effectively bars utilities from signing long-term contracts for power generated by coal inside or outside of California.
Targeting the greenhouse gas emissions that many scientists believe are responsible for a warming planet, the commission set a ceiling of 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide for each megawatt that power plants generate in an hour.
The rule is expected to force utilities to rely on more on natural gas generators, which generate 900 pounds per megawatt-hour, and clean sources such as solar power that generate essentially no carbon dioxide.
The rule, which took effect Feb. 1, could have a huge impact on energy prices statewide because 20 percent of California's power comes from coal, mostly from plants in Nevada, Wyoming and Utah, energy market experts say. But in SDG&E's case, just 3 percent of its power comes from coal.
"It's unlikely that the Sunrise Powerlink is going to be bringing in dirty coal," Anders said. "I guess it's possible, but the chances of that are lessening."
Not enough rooftop panels
Just last week, a panel of global scientists released a report concluding the evidence is more clear than ever that greenhouse gases are causing the climate to change.
Given the gravity of concerns about global warming, and the harm a power line could deliver to treasured wild places such as Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, power line opponents argue that it would be far better if no wires were strung across the backcountry.
Opponents have suggested instead that the clean energy goal be met by spreading solar panels widely on the roofs of homes and businesses throughout San Diego County. An August 2005 study by the San Diego Regional Renewable Energy Study Group, which Anders had a hand in writing, showed that the region could double its electricity supply if every roof was equipped with a panel.
"That is the right approach, theoretically," Anders said. "The question is, can we get to 20 percent (clean power) by 2010 using that approach? And I think the answer is unequivocally no."
While the study said rooftop solar has the potential to deliver 4,000 megawatts to the San Diego County market, Anders said just 25 megawatts of that potential had been developed as of Dec. 31 through 4,048 systems countywide. Those systems represented fewer than 1 percent of homes. An additional 534 systems, totaling 6.5 megawatts, are in the works, he said.
A megawatt is the standard measuring unit for electricity and most of the time is enough to keep the lights on in 750 homes.
In contrast, SDG&E has signed contracts to buy 900 megawatts from a large-scale commercial solar plant that Stirling Energy Systems of Phoenix proposes to build in Imperial County, within reach of the proposed power line. The line, with a capacity of 1,000 megawatts, would run from El Centro in the desert near the Mexican border through Anza-Borrego, Santa Ysabel, Ramona and Rancho Penasquitos to Carmel Valley on the coast.
"While it's being built to keep the lights on, it has the added benefit of bringing so much clean energy to the San Diego region," said Stephanie Donovan, an SDG&E spokeswoman. "Any megawatt of fossil fuel power that you can offset with a megawatt of solar, wind or geothermal power is emissions avoided. And 900 megawatts of solar generation would be the equivalent of taking 800,000 cars off the road. That certainly strengthens the argument for the Sunrise Powerlink."
What's the point?
However, serious questions remain about Stirling's ability to deliver those 900 megawatts because its proposed technology has not been tested commercially. Worldwide, there are only six experimental solar dishes in operation in New Mexico. Stirling estimates it will need 36,000 commercial-ready dishes in the Southern California desert.
Because of that, a key competitor of SDG&E's ---- New Jersey-based LS Power ---- also has doubts about the line's purported global warming benefits.
David Hicks, a spokesman for LS Power, which has proposed replacing the aging South Bay power plant in Chula Vista with a modern 600-megawatt natural gas-fueled generator, said if the solar project fails, the line will have contributed virtually nothing.
"If that power line is going out to a new combined cycle (natural gas) plant out in the desert, then what's the point? We're building one right here," Hicks said. "Our proposal to replace a 1960s-era power plant with one that's twice as efficient helps to achieve the goals that are inherent in the effort to reduce greenhouse gases. We will be able to produce twice as much energy for the same amount of emissions."
Hicks said wires that don't bring in green power would be a net loss for the region, because transmission lines lose up to 10 percent of the electricity they carry.
"That means you need to generate 10 percent more power somewhere outside the county to bring it here," he said, with 10 percent more greenhouse gas emissions.
A net winner
Still, the Imperial Valley holds much promise for solar, wind and geothermal energy, the latter of which plugs into geysers, said Frank Wolak, a Stanford economics professor who has studied California's electricity market extensively. Wolak is chairman of an independent panel that oversees operation of the state's power grid.
The proposed power line could open a way to bring in green power not only from the California desert, but from other parts of the country, Wolak said.
"I would argue that it's going to be a net winner," he said.
There is strong incentive for San Diego Gas & Electric to deliver on its promise of green power, said Anders, the Energy Policy Initiatives Center director.
If the utility doesn't meet its 2010 deadline for using fuel sources other than fossil to fill 20 percent of its supply, it could be fined up to $25 million a year, Anders said.
And despite talk among opponents that SDG&E's real intention is to use Sunrise Powerlink to transport fossil fuel power from Mexico to San Diego and, eventually, Los Angeles, the company steadfastly denies that.
"The fact is, we have signed nothing but contracts for renewable energy to be delivered through the Sunrise Powerlink from Imperial Valley," utility spokesman Donovan said.
But there is yet another potential twist.
When it comes to delivering the electricity from solar and geothermal plants near the Salton Sea, Anders said it is unclear whether Sunrise Powerlink is the only option, as San Diego Gas & Electric has maintained.
Some students of energy suggest that, if more power plants such as the new South Bay were built in the San Diego metropolitan area, room would open up in the existing Southwest Powerlink line along Interstate 8 to transport clean energy from Imperial Valley.
"If the Sunrise Powerlink is the only way to bring in the maximum amount of renewables, then ... it is probably a net positive," Anders said. "But I think the jury is still out, and the evidence is still coming forth as to whether it's true that you can only get the renewables from the Sunrise Powerlink."
Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 740-5442 or ddowney@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
El Guero wrote on Feb 11, 2007 6:57 AM:As the ouset I'd like to say that I hope the comments posted about this story don't degenerate into an attack on the science of global warming.The 'skeptics' have already demonstrated they're really opposed to the politics — not the science — of global warming. Their bogeyman is the Kyoto treaty and its effect on the U.S. economy, should the U.S. government adopt any of the restrictions it calls for. The science proving that human activity is greatly accelerating the process of global climage change is well established. The merits of the Sunrise Powerlink, if there are any, are a separate issue focused solely on SDG&E's claims about the power line's use of renewable sources of energy and whether approval of the line is in the best interests of our communities. If global warming skeptics need an issue worthy of their talents, this is it.
Simon says: wrote on Feb 11, 2007 7:15 AM: Of course global warming is real, (A better name would be "world warming.") There are two reasons for our world to be getting warmer: First - man's attempts to make himself comfortable. As I write I sit in a 73 degree heated home and I am comfortable. Second - the earth is warming naturally. Man will have to cope with that side of the warming of our world and we must come up with the answer quickly. I have heard it said that by the year 2057 there will be no driving on weekends, etc. News for you - if we don't do something soon it will be much worse than that. I have heard it said that by the year 2050 that the worlds fossil fuels will be so depleted and the cost of extracting them from the earth will be so great that we had better have other sources under control. To see us through until we can fully harness solar energy we had better put the war side of our minds to rest and truly harness atomic energy for keeping ourselves comfortable. But, even atomic energy here on earth is not forever - only the sun goes on forever? - as does mans warring mind.
blm wrote on Feb 11, 2007 8:52 AM:Please tell me again why we aren't focusing money on "rooftop solar has the potential to deliver 4,000 megawatts", a completely renewable, clean, sustainable approach to the region's energy? The "wrong" companies get the contracts?
Why Solar Rooftops are slow in coming online wrote on Feb 11, 2007 11:32 AM:Solar on your roof will be slowly developed because of a severe shortage of PV panels, Germany specifically has placed a huge demand. There is also a shortage of PV Grade silicon. Thin film panels use far less, but there is such a shortage that it is difficult to get them domestically. I am building a 3kw system for my home, it satisfys my demand.
SDGE Talks a Green Game wrote on Feb 11, 2007 11:34 AM:But when it comes to playing they are all about preserving their empire. The pretend to like rooftop solar but they preceive it as a threat. They would not allow grid tied net-metering if not mandated by state law. Do you want to screw SDGE, buy a more energy effecient refrigerator and swith over to flourescent bulbs. Incadescent should be illegal. I cut my bill in half.
to:El Guero wrote on Feb 11, 2007 1:08 PM:Your position is clear, if the remedy affects your way of life your opposed to it? That is just the attitude that got us into the mess we are in.
Howiek wrote on Feb 11, 2007 1:17 PM:Well El Guero, so far they haven’t degenerated to that point—whew! All three of these posts make a lot of sense for a change. I thought it was ludicrous that one of the people interviewed said that if all the homes and buildings in San Diego had rooftop solar we wouldn’t need the Sunrise Powerlink—he neglected to mention who was going to pay for all that solar! Simon, you forgot to mention that it has been also estimated that by the year 2050 there will be no more commercial fishing since there won’t be enough marine life to fish! We also might recall that the report that the U.N. put out is also a very conservative document—the temperatures and everything else can and probably will be a lot worse—like rising sea levels—imagine if the seas rise 10 feet! I guess San Diego will have a new downtown look! Also, the gentleman from LS Power neglected to mention a couple of things for this interview: 1) SDG&E has said it will NOT buy any power from them, and 2) Chula Vista has indicated recently that they would like to see the power plant removed and NOT rebuilt! And his asinine remark that the power line would lose about 10 percent of it’s power—and LS’s power lines wouldn’t? Oh and Simon, the sun is NOT going to last forever—maybe 600 million years and it will super nova—burn up!One last comment, if there is another power crisis here in the region may I humbly suggest that San Diego TURN OFF the damn trolley systems! GAWD they eat up a lot of electricity and do nothing really—like carrying maybe 3 percent of the commuting public! What a waste of energy!
Cost considerations wrote on Feb 11, 2007 2:04 PM:If SDGE doesn't deliver and is fined $25 million per year, it is no concern to them. They will simply pass on the costs, like they always do, to the consumer. As long as the government is willing to subsidize the total costs of solar panels, I'd be willing to put them on my roof. As it is, the companies who manufacture these panels have not made it cost effective enough for the average home owner to eat the up front cost. Nor has the government taken that seriously enough to give a large enough tax break so that we can afford to consider solar. Just as the average homeowner has little short term financial incentive to invest in alternative energy, neither does SDGE.
Paul wrote on Feb 11, 2007 4:04 PM:This will not even be a drop in the bucket. The industrial pollution in China and India is absolutely horrid. The reason SDG&E wants the power line to run to North County through Anza Borrego is so that power can also be pumped up North, to also increase their efforts in Northern areas at meeting the green energy mandates.
Save the Park wrote on Feb 11, 2007 6:18 PM:There has got to be a way around the park. It just won't be as profitable as quickly as SDG&E would like. But it would be a sin to cut through Anza Borrego's wilderness.
morty wrote on Feb 11, 2007 8:07 PM:THANK GOD FOR GLOBAL WARMING. WITH OUT IT WE WOULD BE FROZEN TO DEATH.
Ask Kraker wrote on Feb 12, 2007 8:49 AM:911 911, Call the WHAAAAAAMBULANCE! Its gonna be built whether its liked by the tree huggers or not. So move on to something you might be able to affect.
Bob Doule wrote on Feb 13, 2007 7:25 AM:Global Warming is a good thing guys, you just dont know it yet, think about it no more colds days we will able to wear shorts and T shirts all year long, My grandmas arthritus wont act up anymore, and you wont have to pay to go on vacations cause it will be the same weather all around the world, all you pesamistic people start being optamistic, its just natural cycle everything things gonna work out peace out I'm outtie A town down. Sign: Mr. Doule
terry wrote on Feb 14, 2007 8:39 AM:Stirling Solar is not a dream. First it was designed and built at Los Alamos which has some fairly smart engineers. Second the solar collector is fairly easy to build and maintain because it uses established technologies. Finally the Stirling engine is the most efficient engine of it's type. It is a closed system, so nothing is wasted. Theoretically if they were arranged on a grid in an area of the desert 100 miles by 100 miles it would supply the entire country's electrical needs.
robert wrote on Feb 22, 2007 11:47 AM:Does any one know the status of SES, if they really are going to build thousands of solar dishes, cheap enough to compete. Or is it all a bunch of hype designed to get this powerline built for other, more dark purposes. Build it because we need energy so that civilization can continue to grow and hopefully it will provide clean power (to our descendants by the time SES starts on their long awated solar farms).
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement


