Hamdania squad leader due in court next week
By: MARK WALKER - Staff Writer | ∞
Marine Sgt. Lawrence Hutchins III
North County Times File Photo
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery
NORTH COUNTY ---- Attorneys for a Marine sergeant who allegedly led the abduction and slaying of an Iraqi civilian last year are attempting to prevent prosecutors from introducing incriminating statements by other defendants during their client's upcoming court-martial.
Sgt. Lawrence Hutchins III is due in a Camp Pendleton courtroom Monday and Tuesday for motion hearings in advance of his scheduled April trial.
Hutchins is accused of murder and six other felonies in the April 26, 2006, death of Hashim Ibrahim Awad. Five of the men he led have entered guilty pleas and said the crime was carried out under Hutchins' direction.
Hutchins' lead attorney, Rich Brannon, said the defense also will ask the judge to approve a second trip to Iraq for attorneys.
A 10-day trip last month to the village of Hamdania, in Anbar province where the killing took place, did not provide sufficient time or access to witnesses, Brannon said.
"We were hampered in that we couldn't get a lot of things we wanted to do accomplished because of security concerns," Brannon said this week during a telephone interview from his office in Gainesville, Ga.
Hutchins' attorneys and those for another of the three remaining defendants, Cpl. Marshall Magincalda, were able to visit Hamdania, talk to a few residents and see the site where Awad was killed.
But the five-member group, escorted by troops from Camp Pendleton's I Marine Expeditionary Force, was not able to interview relatives of the 52-year-old slain Iraqi, a retired policeman who prosecutors have repeatedly said had no known ties to insurgent activity.
Despite not being able to talk to any Awad family members, Brannon said he believes the trip will give him credibility with the military jury that will hear his client's case, which is set for a two-week trial starting April 23 but could be moved to later in the year.
"I can at least tell the jury that I have been there and I have spent time with the Marines on the ground in Iraq," said Brannon, who served in the Marine Corps in the 1980s.
Hutchins faces up to life in prison if convicted. The five men who have pleaded guilty have been sentenced to terms ranging from 12 months to eight years behind bars.
The slaying, according to statements in court from those who have pleaded guilty, was carried out to "send a message" to Hamdania residents that the troops were not going to tolerate further attacks that had seen some of their fellow Marines killed and injured.
Brannon maintains his client is not guilty. Despite the statements from the men who have pleaded guilty, he said he does not believe the full story of what happened has yet been aired.
Platoon members have said that their intended target was a known insurgent believed responsible for numerous roadside bombings. Brannon contends that was the man that Hutchins believed his squad had taken from a home, bound and placed along a road to be shot.
Hutchins was among the shooters and performed a "dead check" after the initial round of shooting in which he fired three rounds into the man's head, according those who pleaded guilty.
Brannon also hinted that he will raise issues that Marines in Anbar confront almost daily.
"You cannot imagine what five or six months over there does to a human being when you are placed in a situation where you can be killed by anyone you see at almost any time," he said.
None of the men charged in the case have yet gone to trial. Each has been offered a plea deal with the convening authority over the case, Lt. Gen. James Mattis, including Hutchins.
"It was nowhere near acceptable," Brannon said of the offer his client got, declining to outline its specific terms. "It represented serious jail time."
Besides Hutchins and Magincalda, the remaining defendant is Cpl. Trent Thomas.
Earlier this month, Thomas withdrew six guilty pleas he had entered on Jan. 18. That move came on the third day of his sentencing hearing and resulted, he said, from a realization that he now believes he was "acting under the color of law" in carrying out a direct order he said Hutchins had issued.
The first man to plead guilty in the case, Navy Corpsman Melson Bacos, testified during the Thomas hearing that Hutchins told the squad immediately after the killing: "Congratulations, gents. We just got away with murder."
Brannon declined to comment on statements by Thomas and Bacos.
Contact staff writer Mark Walker at (760) 740-3529 or mlwalker@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Feb 23, 2007 4:18 PM:True Grit! Mr.Brannon; An attorney with the backbone to go all out for his client. One would think that NCIS, the Washington Post, CNN, and Time Magazine have a moral responsibility and obligation to offer their expertise and assistance in his search. They had no problem finding the so-called witnesses during a botched investigation. Under the UCMJ the accused have the right to face their accusers. It was denied them for over 8 months; all the while with the awareness it would be difficult, if not impossible, to access them again. Perhaps they could find one of the family members; Awad's brother, Gowad..."known"insurgent. Someone of higher rank than the Sergeant ordered fliers to be distributed. Maybe they could order some fliers that offer a reward for Gowad and the other so-called witnesses. I'm glad Mr.Brannon is asking for prosecutors to refrain from introducing incriminating statements by other defendants when the Sgt. goes to court-martial. The prosecution has had a field day for months, allowing leaks and defaming statements to be heard while there were still others to be heard. A child would know that this taints any attempt at fair trials for the last defendants. I also agree with Mr. Brannon's feeling that Sgt.Hutchins believed his squad had the insurgent known as Gowad. Hutchins was not there. Bacos stated that Thomas and Magincalda entered Awad's home while he and Pennington waited outside. But, Thomas stated that he and "three" others invaded Awad's home, waking him and dragging him outside. So; take your pick. Who do we believe? Jodka stated he didn't know who it was because the guy ran down the road to the North as they shot at him. What happened to shooting a bound man? Do we now have a corpse running down the road? Yet, the so-called witnesses have two entirely different versions. ALL of this is based on NCIS interpretation and "version" after its "interrogation" of the accused. NCIS and the prosecution do NOT have all their ducks in a row. The ducks are scattering!!!!
AW4GoofyOutLoud wrote on Feb 24, 2007 10:54 AM:I think I FINALLY understand this case. It's all a big coverup by the USMC. Awad actually committed suicide using a M-16. It's clear to me now. Thanks so much.
AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Feb 24, 2007 1:08 PM:To Goofy: Good choice of blog name. Wrong! I believe it was an AK-47, GOOFY!
AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Feb 25, 2007 1:38 PM:Here's a thought. You'd think that, if the Iraqi so-called witnesses, were so terribly upset at the loss of a loved one...they would be "offering" to come to the U.S. So;what's the problem? The Marine Corps should be able to find these guys easily if they're really telling the truth. AW shucks! I almost forgot. They already got their money didn't they?
Thumper wrote on Feb 26, 2007 9:38 AM: "If you can't say anything nice, Don't say anything at all."
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement


