San Diego County called epicenter of threats to 1.5 million-acre state park system

By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | Sunday, February 25, 2007 9:45 PM PST

NORTH COUNTY ---- California's diverse park system is under siege from development all over the state, and nowhere is the threat more severe than in environmentally rich San Diego County, state officials and park supporters say.

Running out of room for building highways, sewer pipes and power lines on private property, developers and utilities are increasingly turning to state parkland ---- which makes up 1.5 percent of California's land mass and about a quarter of San Diego's ---- for their projects.

"San Diego County is kind of the epicenter of a series of very serious threats to California's state parks," said Elizabeth Goldstein, president of the California State Parks Foundation, an advocacy group, in a recent interview.

As a result, one of America's finest state park systems is in danger of being undermined, Goldstein said.

California's extensive system covers 278 parks and 1.5 million acres. The parks give visitors a chance to soak up the sun on golden beaches, feast one's eyes on colorful desert wildflowers, marvel at towering ancient redwoods and take a trip back in time at ghost towns.

San Diego County is home to several, including 600,000-acre Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, the largest state park in the continental U.S.

Others include San Onofre State Beach, with its famous Trestles surfing area and fifth-highest visitor total of all California parks; Old Town San Diego State Historic Park, which offers a glimpse into early county life; and Torrey Pines State Beach, one of two places in the world where the rare evergreens grow.

Roy Stearns, a spokesman for the California Department of Parks and Recreation in Sacramento, said there is no danger the system will disappear one day in the face of development pressure. But there is a risk, he said, that that pressure will steadily erode many of its best features.

"It's like we're starting to chip away at the system," Stearns said. "We're taking a little bit here and a little bit there, and once it's gone you never get it back. Once it turns into power lines and asphalt, nobody ever takes that stuff out."

The San Diego County threat

Park supporters in San Diego County are perhaps most concerned about the future of Anza-Borrego, where San Diego Gas & Electric Co. wants to plant 150-foot-tall metal towers in the sand and stretch fat 500-kilovolt wires across 23 miles of largely pristine landscape. The proposed Sunrise Powerlink transmission line would be visible from about one-sixth of the park, officials say.

Supporters also fret that little will be left of San Onofre state park if an Orange County transportation agency gets the green light to build a four-lane toll road ---- with room for six lanes ---- on it. The highway would cover 325 of the park's 2,000 acres in pavement.

Park supporters also fret about the U.S. government's plan to build another layer of the international-border barrier through Border Field State Park, forcing park visitors to line up to pass through a patrolled gate to frolic at a popular beach.

Sen. Christine Kehoe, D-San Diego, said she is deeply concerned about the proposals.

"In San Diego County alone, there are three major projects which propose to use park lands that were purchased and maintained with our tax dollars," Kehoe said. "Because open space is readily available, our parks are at risk of becoming the preferred corridors for infrastructure siting. Parks seem to have become the paths of least resistance."

For their part, proponents of the toll road and power line say they set their sights on state land only after surveys showed there was no other way to build their projects.

And not everyone agrees the projects will hurt the parks.

Gina Zari, spokeswoman for Assemblywoman Mimi Walters, R-Laguna Niguel, said the representative for coastal areas of southern Orange County and northern San Diego County backs the toll road and believes it actually will help the park, by providing money for improvements.

Still, park supporters maintain the developments will hurt the parks. And they say the proposals reflect an emerging attitude throughout the state that developed private property is more important to preserve than undeveloped parkland, supporters say.

"I heard one person refer to (state parkland) as underutilized open space," Stearns said. "What a tragic comment. Is that what Yosemite is? Is that what Yellowstone is? If that's what it is, why don't we just sell it today and put shopping centers on it tomorrow?"

No way around

SDG&E officials, however, say they highly value Anza-Borrego.

Because of that, said Jim Avery, vice president of electric transmission, the utility selected an existing power-line corridor as its preferred route for going through the park instead of proposing an entirely new one. Avery said SDG&E intends to minimize the Sunrise power line's footprint on the land by using compact H-frame towers ---- with straight vertical poles and a cross-arm ---- instead of erecting massive metal structures that some have likened to erector sets.

Avery said the utility would prefer to avoid the park, but it dominates the eastern side of the county and there is almost no way around it.

"There are basically two miles between the park and the Mexican border," Avery said.

Following the border would place the new line next to an existing one called Southwest Powerlink. Avery said that is an unattractive option because a wildfire could knock out both sets of wires at the same time and spark widespread power outages in metro San Diego.

Avery added that the utility cannot hide the line underground because 500-kilovolt wires cannot be buried.

SDG&E has said it plans to change out those for 230-kilovolt wires ---- which can be buried ---- at a proposed Warner Springs substation. Company officials say that will allow them to avoid homes in Ramona and Rancho Penasquitos.

When told of that strategy, state park Commissioner Caryl Hart, during a recent hearing in Borrego Springs, wanted to know whether 230-kilovolt wires could be used in the park, too, and placed underground.

"Theoretically, it's possible; economically, it's not justifiable," Avery said, saying that could boost the project cost well beyond the current estimate of $1.3 billion. As if on cue, the lights at the Borrego Springs Resort flickered at that moment.

Park commissioners held the meeting to gather information, in case they are one day called to make a decision. It is the California Public Utilities Commission that will determine, by January 2008, whether the line can be built. But, in its current form, the project would require eliminating 73 acres of designated wilderness in the park, and the Park Commission would have to approve that change.

San Onofre State Beach

As for the Orange County toll road, going through San Onofre on the other side of the county line is the only way to avoid drilling through San Clemente neighborhoods at huge cost and with great outrage, said Jennifer Seaton, a spokeswoman for the Foothill-Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency. She said alternate routes for the final four miles of Highway 241, which would connect the road to Interstate 5, would displace anywhere from 112 to 263 Orange County houses.

Going around the park by moving the route deeper into Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base won't work because that would interfere with Marine activities, she said.

The park is on the base, and the state operates it under a 50-year lease with the military that expires in 2021.

Whatever the reasons for the route, Goldstein, the parks foundation president, said the highway would wipe out much of the park's inland reach. But Seaton said it would not affect the beach, where 95 percent of park visitors go.

That doesn't matter, Goldstein said.

"This is an intact environmental resource that no question has an extraordinary beach," Goldstein said. "But it also has an extraordinary inland unit. It is a long and narrow canyon that comes down to the beach."

The park experience

Goldstein said the highway would swing within a few hundred feet of San Mateo Campground. It won't offer much of a camping experience with a 16-foot sound wall to look at, she said.

Seaton suggested that experience already is compromised by the noise and ground shaking triggered by nearby military training.

Zari, of Assemblywoman Walters' office, said, "It's not Yosemite. It's very, very rundown."

Highway opponents also worry that its construction will compromise the world-class waves at Trestles Beach, a popular surfing spot. Seaton said the agency's studies prove that won't happen.

Goldstein remains skeptical. "The truth of the matter is, we won't know until it is too late to fix it," she said.

Farther down the coast, the now-pleasant day at the beach in Border Field State Park is in danger of being compromised. As part of the nation's bid to fortify the U.S.-Mexico border, a fence is to be built through the park.

"You're going to have to go through a gate to get down to the beach," Goldstein said. "And we all know that a lot of people in San Diego County are not going to feel comfortable doing that when there are Border Patrol agents inside that gate and on the beach. That's not exactly going to be a pleasant recreational experience for people."

Nor, said Goldstein, is looking at power lines going to be a pleasant experience for Anza-Borrego visitors. The wires would follow Highway 78, the main artery through the park, for several miles. And they would cross next to Tamarisk Campground ---- one of two park campgrounds.

"It's in the heart of the park," she said. "It's really going to be visible from everywhere."

-- Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 740-5442 or ddowney@nctimes.com.

Next
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Concerned wrote on Feb 25, 2007 9:28 PM:Let us be clear. Illegal Immigrant is not synonymous with terrorism. It is shameful, absolutely despicable, and appalling to read racist comments. Illegal v. Legal is the debate today…lets look back a few hundred years... Native v. Pilgrim! The fact of the matter is, the United States needs illegals because it’s a segment of the populations that can be easily controlled and exploited.

if it smells like a rat wrote on Feb 25, 2007 11:52 PM:I knew I was smelling a rat when I started to read this article...how it just smells of this pro-illegal immigration newspaper it trying to cover up the desire not to build our much-needed fence by trying to cover it up in an environmental issue. Confused...errr..I mean "concerned", the only people bringing up race are the pro-illegal immigrants. This is because they don't have a leg to stand on so you should call it something bad to make some point. Most people around here aren't saying "those mexican illegal immigrants"....we are calling them what they are -- felons. If it smells like a rat, it's an illegal immigrant. Go back home and leave mine alone.

controlled & exploited? wrote on Feb 26, 2007 12:00 AM:The illegals are the controlling and exploiting ones. They aren't cheap labor, even if you forgot about all of the social services that our tax dollars pay for that they are depleting. Controlling? Tell that to my mom who used to live in a nice neighborhood and now has to put bars on her windows and put up with screaming loud spanish music and beer parties with guests who leave half-empty beer cans in her drive-way, along with gang-related graffiti....7 cars parked in front of one house that houses a "family" of 13 people. And the police do nothing. Tell me who's controlling. I'll tell you how the environment is getting all stunk up.

Daren wrote on Feb 26, 2007 12:24 AM:The Pilgrims of the 1600's were not illegal immigrants to this country because there were no laws preventing or limiting emigration to this country. Now there are laws that limit lawfull residence to this country. This is a fundamental difference that criminal illegal advocates seem to conveniently(sp?) forget.

To Concerned wrote on Feb 26, 2007 5:08 AM:Are you sure that we are reading the same article?? Or NCT made a mistake? In any case, leave the parks alone. That is what was expected when they were created years and years ago. Toll road to destroy San Onofre so a couple of commuters can crawl to work a little faster. Power lines through AnzaBorrego to increase profits for SD&G (Sempra). We need contact points identified to fight against these projects of greed.

Bob wrote on Feb 26, 2007 5:42 AM:The root cause of over development is overpopulation. The reason both of the issues are routinely ignored is because there is no profit in restraint.

Border Field State Park is also named FriendShip Park wrote on Feb 26, 2007 7:18 AM:and prior to the installation of the fence was frequented by South of the border neighbors and residents. This was the PRIMARY reason and goal for which the lovely park was developed. I lived and worked in IB during the eighties and nineties, rode my bike through the back roads, or rode horseback to the beach and park. Prior to the fence it was frequented solely by picnicking Hispanic families for whom the park was intended.

American woman wrote on Feb 26, 2007 8:39 AM:Let's think about this. I'm the party who tries to prod Americans out of their comfort zones to confront the North American Union. If you have a computer, you can share all the information that any of the rest of us know about the NAU. No computer? Go to the library...they will let you use theirs. The North American Union remains a generally covert effort by the combined governments of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico, but articles like this one are indications that NAU is soon to be a reality. It stands to reason that the issues addressed in this article will become more and more common. Once the borders have virtually disappeared, a lot more infrastructure is to be expected EVERYWHERE, but especially AT AND AROUND our (former) borders. After all, for a while, those locations will be rife with humanity, trucks and trains. Of course, they will have to spread throughout the NAU region, but prepare for a stampede to the "middle" at the outset of the settling of the "region" as a whole! Is it starting to sink-in? This country, her borders, her Rule of Law, the U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights and all, will be a memory. Our sovereignty will end. Unknown third world entities will roam into our "region" freely. If you think the middle class is in trouble now, it will quickly disappear when corporate globalists and elitist North Americanists take over. Welcome to serf-city, U.S.A.

SDGreed$E wrote on Feb 26, 2007 8:53 AM:It's all about getting a line to the Mexican power plants. Don't fall for the Sunrise Eco-power PR BS.

Osider wrote on Feb 26, 2007 10:00 AM:Lets not let Orange County dictate what happens in San Diego County where Trestles technically is. We do not want to accomidate OC at the expense of SD State Parks.

Confused wrote on Feb 26, 2007 12:37 PM:What is with the rambling on illegals in an article on overpopulation??? Are readers lame or is NCT posting the wrong rubbish?

Goatskull wrote on Feb 26, 2007 12:38 PM:What's with all these comments about illegal immigration? What does that have to do with this article? Am I missing something?

Concerned-1 wrote on Feb 26, 2007 1:17 PM:I guess I'll have to use this handle eventhough I've blogged for almost a year as "Concerned." I obviously don't agree with this person. That said, parks are good, illegals are bad, the rape of nature for the sake of progress be damned!

Patrick wrote on Feb 26, 2007 6:10 PM:Maybe it's time to take a look at some of the laws against building vertical. Around North County there is not a sky scaper to be found. yet all wee se up here is more and more land torn up. I say build up, not out.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos