Is the NCAA tournament worthy of all the hype?

By: LOREN NELSON - Sports Editor | Saturday, March 24, 2007 9:24 PM PDT

Is the NCAA tournament worthy of all the hype?
By: JAY PARIS - Staff Writer

NO
The world's greatest sporting event is reaching its conclusion.

The Super Bowl? The World Cup? The World Series? The Westminster dog show? According to those with eyes the size of basketballs, it's the NCAA tournament.

Please.

I know, I know: 65 teams vying for the title, competing on an even basis over this stretch of March that brings madness.

Yep, those underdog teams have really made their mark. Seen the rankings of the remaining teams? This isn't "Hoosiers," folks. This isn't Gene Hackman spitting out a fiery pregame talk. This is the NCAA, where big schools feast on lower seeds like hungry sportswriters abusing a postgame buffet.

The myth perpetuated by the NCAA ---- an organization that makes the old KGB look like a PTA group ---- is the romance of the little guy knocking off the big dude. Of David getting off a slingshot round on Goliath. Of a team with a budget large enough for three basketballs and a miniature grease chalkboard defeating a squad with more money than a Third World country.

Which brings me back to the Westminster dog show. At least those athletes are treated better than how the NCAA rewards its players.

What riles me is the gazillions of dollars being made on the backs of these players. Coaches command salaries rivaling CEOs at major corporations, then get extra bucks for wearing a logo on their sweater.

The players? They get slapped for receiving an extra ham sandwich from a booster, or accepting airfare to visit an ailing relative. While the NCAA stuffs its shirt with fistfuls of dollars, it's on the lookout for players getting a handout.

But Mr. Paris, someone will write, don't these players get scholarships? Yep, and that's great. But if someone is making $100 and you get a nickel ---- and you're the reason they are making that $100 ---- is that right? Remember, CBS paid $6 billion in the late 1990s to telecast this hoops orgy.

While that's close to what Loren Nelson earns directing our department, it doesn't make it less obscene.

What's nasty is how the NCAA cheats its players. While it trumpets the purity of this college event, there are Web links and advertising pitches on nearly every inch of the bench and scorer's table.

But in keeping score with the players ---- the guys who make this happen ---- they get the equivalent of a dog bone, while others dine on filet mignon.

I like hoops as much as the next guy. But fairness should trump this hyped exercise that exploits young men.

You call it Sweet this, Elite that. To me, it's a sour showing of how elitist NCAA administratorschase the almighty dollar.

And that's final.

Contact staff writer Jay Paris at jparis8@aol.com.

YES
Most everyone in the rowdy crowd standing in front of the massive TV screen was exchanging high-fives and disbelieving looks.

The throng was expanding by the minute. The decibel level was going through the roof.

Something big was going on. But what?

It was mid-March in Laughlin, Nev. I can't remember which casino we were in, but the air in the sports book was electric.

A buddy and I had escaped from the Midwest for as many holes of golf as we could squeeze into a long weekend in the Nevada desert. But now something else had caught our attention: the NCAA tournament.

Turns out Gonzaga was in the midst of another upset special. The Bulldogs were draining 3-pointer after 3-pointer in their 1999 second-round stunner over Stanford, and a hundred or so strangers were going bonkers.

Just like a million or so carefully laid-out brackets from that year, our meticulously planned itinerary had not accounted for the Zags.

So we said the hell with golf, grabbed some beers and started screaming with everyone else.

Doesn't matter if you're from Michigan or Montana or Maine ---- everyone cheers for the underdog. The NCAA tournament galvanizes fans like no other sporting event, especially when the Gonzagas or George Masons or Kent States are about to slay some hoops behemoth from a so-called "power conference."

No postseason generates this type of buzz, even if it comes in short bursts and often disappears as quickly as it arrives. Cinderella teams get their moment in the spotlight, but only the best ones survive for the long haul in this tournament. It takes six wins to be called a champion, and that takes luck ---- and Gonzaga ---- out of the championship equation. Just as it should be.

If you want to see Prince or Janet Jackson ---- and maybe, just maybe, a wardrobe malfunction ---- tune in to the Super Bowl. If you want to see lousy teams playing meaningless games, college football has a Jimmy Dean Sausage Bowl just for you.

If you want high drama and high-fives and the kind of excitement that will make you blow off that afternoon tee time with no regrets, the NCAA tournament is the one and only.

Contact sports editor Loren Nelson at (760) 740-3551 or lnelson@nctimes.com.

Next
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Roger P. wrote on Mar 25, 2007 11:15 AM:No!

Pluto wrote on Mar 25, 2007 5:21 PM:What Jay says about the NCAA may or may not be true. In either case, it doesn't diminish the fact that this tournament is the greatest sporting event of each year. Yes, the top seeded teams usually win, but not always. And what would one expect? They are top seeds because they are the best. These games have been incredibly hard fought, creative, athletic - game after game, almost unbelievable. Jay should get the chip off his shoulder and try to enjoy this great event. Go Bruins!

Come on. wrote on Mar 26, 2007 3:09 PM:Ok Mr. Paris. So the players aren't getting rewarded for making the NCAA billions of dollars. Let's remember why they are in college to begin with, TO GET AN EDUCATION!! Playing basketball is not a job in college. The goal when you go to college is to get your degree, better yourself socially and prepare yourself for life in the real world (not the one seen on MTV). Those players that have the skills to move on to the NBA will make more than their share and those who don't will have an education to use for the rest of their life. Those young men being 'exploited' are also making millions for their respective instituions, which can be used to improve conditions which includes supporting other student athletes. I think you've missed the point of COLLEGE athletics altogether.

Come on, Come on wrote on Mar 26, 2007 3:39 PM:Have you seen the graduation rates for the major sports at the major universities? There are exceptions, such as Penn State and Notre Dame, but most are dismal at best. Playing basketball IS a job for most of these athletes, though they are dismally paid. Many hope to get the training and exposure they need for that dream in the NBA or NFL. And what would they do if they didn't play for the colleges and weren't pro material?

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos