Outdoor smoke can be just as toxic
By: Candice M. Porter - Commentary | ∞
In response to your April 18 editorial, "Oceanside ought to butt out," outdoor environmental tobacco smoke is much more than annoying. It is a complex mixture of thousands of gases and fine particles, with some constituents that persist in the air even when there is a breeze. People should not be forced to be exposed to known carcinogenic substances.
Outdoor drifting tobacco smoke can trigger asthma attacks, bronchial infections and other serious health problems in nonsmokers.
Personal liberties are precious and by all means should be protected and preserved. However, special conditions must be implemented when the personal rights and freedoms of one cause harm to another.
Also, the great majority of Californians, more than 85 percent, do not smoke and have a basic right to breathe clean air. This is especially true if they have a health condition such as asthma, cancer or cardiovascular disease that can be negatively impacted by exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.
Asthma is the No. 1 reason that children enter our hospital emergency rooms in San Diego. Many of the 96 million Americans who have chronic conditions like asthma and bronchitis, which make them especially susceptible to environmental tobacco smoke, have been held to be entitled to protection under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has warned that breathing drifting tobacco smoke for as little as 30 minutes (less than the time one might be exposed outdoors on a beach or in a park) can raise a nonsmoker's risk of suffering a fatal heart attack to that of a smoker.
The scientific basis regarding the toxicity of outdoor environmental tobacco smoke is extensive and has come from a large body of scientific evidence and has been endorsed by major science and health organizations throughout the world.
Walter Williams, in his column, "Science goes up in smoke" (April 19), trivialized the scientific process used by the Environmental Protection Agency. In January 2006, the California Air Resources Board declared outdoor tobacco smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. The findings are well-documented and conclusive.
The Air Resources Board assessed the level of environmental tobacco smoke exposure to Californians and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment evaluated the health effects associated with environmental tobacco smoke exposure. The report was then submitted to an independent scientific review panel.
The Air Resources Board's outdoor nicotine monitoring results are comparable to those found in some smokers' homes. Smokers' homes can have indoor nicotine levels 30 times higher than nonsmokers' homes.
Under state law, the Air Resources Board is authorized to identify a substance as a Toxic Air Contaminant if it determines the
substance is "an air pollutant which may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality, in serious illness, or which may pose a present or potential hazard to human health."
Federal agencies, national scientific, medical and health organizations promote policies that protect human health through the creation of smoke-free environments.
Lawmakers are clearly making the intelligent choice to protect the health, safety and environment for San Diegans from environmental tobacco smoke.
Candice M. Porter is director of the Youth Tobacco Prevention Corps, a group of teens from San Dieguito Academy and La Costa Canyon and Torrey Pines high schools who work toward the prevention of tobacco use by teens.
Advertisement
Listen up Kern! wrote on Apr 29, 2007 9:40 PM:Not only are you killing yourself with your nasty habit but you are affecting the lives of all around you. Any of your family have asthma? If not, you were lucky.
Candy wrote on Apr 30, 2007 3:20 AM:How big is the atmosphere? Is it self-cleansing over time? If I place one drop of cyanide in a glass of water, will it kill me if I drink it? Why not smoking and non-smoking sections at the beach, like surfing and boogie boarding sections? When will the sacrifice of our civil liberties end? Next, will the police arrest anyone who eats non-organic foods? Will the police arrest anyone who is overweight?
James wrote on Apr 30, 2007 6:34 AM:Since there has not been one documented case of "second hand smoke" killing anyone, or causing anyone a health problem, why are we talking about this? I will tell you why. Liberals want to control everyones lives as much as possible pure and simple, there is no other explanation!
mixed message wrote on Apr 30, 2007 7:42 AM:The troubling mixed message is tha "only 15 % of adults smoke" which (wink wink) means this is a minority we can safely kick around! If outdoor smoke were truly a toxic poison we would all be dead from our own fireplaces.
Roger wrote on Apr 30, 2007 7:59 AM:Perhaps we should stop extending the lives of these people that have all of these genetic weaknessess. Death is simply a way of telling us to slow down. Let's make it illegal to have children if anyone in your gene pool has asthma or other illnesses that are bothered by minute amount of impurities in the air. I'm a non-smokers but you anti-smoking fanatics are simply as ridiculous as the statements I made above. Get a real life in the real world and stop thinking that the world revolves around YOU!
A 15 percenter wrote on Apr 30, 2007 8:22 AM:First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew. Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist. Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me. Pastor Martin Niemöller
Hey try to wrote on Apr 30, 2007 8:39 AM:learn to read, can you read the labels on the pumps at gas stations? It is KNOWN to cause CANCER! Oh wait we are just worried about mother earth, not her children!
Up In Smoke wrote on Apr 30, 2007 9:42 AM:I am more concerned with the air quality on red flag smog days. In LA, they cancel physical education classes that are held outdoors when it is too smoggy. Before the government goes after smokers, it should start requiring corporations to cut down on the pollutants they send into the air on a daily basis. Just one red flag smog day exposes people who work outside to chemicals equivalent to smoking 2 packs of cigarettes.
It's a Myth wrote on Apr 30, 2007 10:36 AM:The whole second hand smoke thing is a myth. You get way more pollution from cars and barbeques and lawn mowers then anything else but nobody wants them banned. How come??? Get a grip!
Ban Cars!!! wrote on Apr 30, 2007 11:22 AM:Not smokers! Oh thats right I forgot, nobody wants to give up driving, even if it kills us!
B4 we get wrote on Apr 30, 2007 11:30 AM:into this issue and global riboff, can we go back and address the bird flu? You know where these same wingnuts had told us millions of people would die. One established case of bird flu in the USA 2002!!!!!!! Tuberculosis Rampant!
Asthmatic wrote on Apr 30, 2007 12:07 PM:Thanks for all the “science” on second hand tobacco smoke, but, being one of the approximately 10 percent who have asthma, I already have all the hard empirical evidence I need. Personally, I think outdoor smoking should have been banned first. Everyone has to share the outdoors occasionally ... be we can choose our restaurants, and other places of business. It is pretty rotten to go to the beach expecting fresh ocean air and breath tobacco smoke. Still I hesitate to urge government to ban smoking at the beach ... knowing how government does things, they would probably make the prevailing up-wind part of the beach the designated smoking area. Then I would have no place to go. As it is now, I just pick out those who look like losers, and camp up-wind from them.
Cartoon Beach Fire wrote on Apr 30, 2007 4:59 PM:I liked a cartoon I saw the other day with someone complainging about cigarette smoke while just adjacent on the beach was someone having a bond fire. I wonder which is more unhealthy? I don't have nearly as much of a problem with the cigarette smoke as I do the BUTTS. I'm riding down the road on my motorcycle one day, and this BUTT comes flying out the window of the car in front of me, and next thing you know I'm riding through a firestorm of sparks as it hits the ground and it is flung up into my path. I wanted to kick the dudes mirror off. I can't even count the times I've seen this, and the number of BUTTS at the beach is DISGUSTING. Too bad smokers can't control themselves when it comes to littering.
sick and tired wrote on Apr 30, 2007 7:52 PM:to all that want to throw rocks: sit in a sealed garage with your car running continuously, and i will sit in the same sized sealed room smoking cigarettes continuously and one thing i absolutely guarantee i will live longer than you. Moral to the story, if you are so concerned about pollutants and air quality, your own selfish self centered interests will turn the rock you thrown back at the glass house your living in. Stop being a hypocrite.
- Burst pipe causes 70-foot-deep sink hole in Carlsbad (2501)
- REGION: State green power plan will cost consumers billions (1487)
- HOUSING: Fraud victims struggle to regain cash, credit (1412)
- REGION: Talk of new immigration bill gets mixed reaction (1130)
- VISTA: Grocer brothers suspected of threatening former butcher (1049)
Advertisement




