Lt. Phan deserved better

By: North County Times Opinion staff - | Thursday, May 3, 2007 11:00 PM PDT

Our view: Dropped charges follow trial riddled with troubling developments

There's an old joke about the term "military justice" being an oxymoron. Unfortunately for Marine 2nd Lt. Nathan Phan, who this week had criminal charges against him dropped , that joke probably isn't very funny.

Last summer, Phan was charged with three counts of assault and one count of filing a false statement. Only indirectly, those charges stemmed from an investigation into the April 2006 slaying of a retired Iraqi policeman in Hamdania. Eight men under Phan's command, seven Marines and one Navy corpsman, were eventually charged with the April 26 slaying of Hashim Ibrahim Awad.

But Phan was never accused of participating in or having any knowledge of that grisly event. Instead, investigators pursuing the Hamdania killing charged Phan with choking two Iraqi detainees, placing an unloaded pistol against one's mouth and spraying soda pop into the nose of the other, saying it was acid. They also charged Phan with falsely filing a radio report stating that he had released one of the insurgents being questioned.

Although the charges against him have been dropped, the Phan affair exposes some of the worst lapses and abuses of the military justice system. Seen in the worst light, Phan may not have simply been a victim of circumstance -- he may have been a scapegoat.

During a preliminary hearing earlier this year, three enlisted men testified that the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, also known by its acronym NCIS, had falsified statements about them having witnessed Phan commit the alleged assaults. After those disturbing revelations, the presiding officer, Lt. Col. William Pigott, made clear his intention to ask higher-ups to conduct two investigations, one examining the actions of attorneys who dealt with the witnesses and the other to review the conduct of NCIS. The results of that request are still pending.

If your only exposure to NCIS has been the television show of the same name, you're entitled to surprise. But if there's one thing that the recent court proceedings at Camp Pendleton have demonstrated, it is that NCIS appears woefully unprepared for such probes. For starters, NCIS still relies mostly on written statements, not video and audio recording as do most civilian criminal investigators. That leaves a lot of room for fuzzy memories, or worse, funny business. We hope the agency changes this outdated policy posthaste.

As part of his plea deal, Phan admitted that he had exceeded "the permissible limits of the official rules of engagement regarding interrogation of insurgents."

Phan's platoon was given an excruciatingly difficult assignment: Trained to execute combat and patrol missions, they were asked instead to gather intelligence about insurgent activity in Hamdania, in the volatile Anbar province northwest of Baghdad. They were given a grand total of 45 minutes of instruction on detainee handling and counterinsurgency work. These Marines were clearly under pressure and underprepared. Still, an intelligence officer at battalion headquarters testified that despite their limited training, the squad was doing exemplary work.

Defenders of the eight men charged in the April 26 slaying have used the "fog of war" to justify their crime, but the damning testimony and guilty pleas of four Marines and the Navy corpsman have made that rationale difficult to swallow. Phan, however, is another story, and deserves the benefit of the doubt afforded him by even the military justice system.

There is no question that any criminal charge against U.S. military personnel based on accepted standards of evidence should be brought to trial. But to try Lt. Phan on such flimsy evidence -- a 24-year-old who volunteered to do his country's dirty work and lead men under the most difficult of circumstances, while most of his peers are still trying to decide what they want to be when they grow up -- is unacceptable.

Advertisement

6 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

mark wrote on May 4, 2007 11:00 AM:In a civilian trial the jurors are instructed that if you find a witness, NCIS, has been untruthful in one aspect of the case you can infer that all of their testimony is suspect. Also I don't put much faith in jail house confessions. They are obtained in a little too controlled of an environment.

Navy Vet wrote on May 4, 2007 1:12 PM:Unfortunately, even though the charges have been dropped, Lt. Phan's career is effectively over. This episode will haunt him, it will reflect in his FitReps and he will more than likely be denied re-enlistment if he desires to continue his service as a United States Marine.

Wow! wrote on May 4, 2007 2:01 PM:How fair and honorable is that of a way to treat one who loved his country?

John1 wrote on May 4, 2007 3:43 PM:"Fog of war"? Who the hell is using "fog of war"? My son isn't. Shumate didn't. Jackson didn't. Pennington didn't. What of the Marines' classified report on Awad? What of the "Kill or Capture" order issued to Phan with a 48 hour window? My son and his squadmates were placed in a situation from which there was no escape: given their assignment, they were going to die or be forced to take a drastic measure that had eventual and inevitable consequences. But in the end, they're alive- "tried by 12" but not "carried by 6".

Joe wrote on May 5, 2007 9:19 AM:John1- your dam right As Marines we are taught Kill or Be Killed Then they throw us into a situation that IS Impossable- STREET Fighting - The enemy wares civilian cloths - They court marshal us for doing our Job and then Distroy our morale and every other Marine who ever wore a uniform - The First 3 grades should be ashamed of them seleve and what they've done to distroy the heritage of the Corps- Joe, USMC - Class of 52

AW4cryinoutloud wrote on May 7, 2007 6:31 PM:Gee! I almost missed this article. It's great that NCtimes Opinion Staff realizes the inadequacy of NCIS. I'd like to have seen them focus the same amont of concern on all of the accused in the Hamdania incident. Like John1, I don't remember the "fog of war" being part of those who defend them. I only remember it in relation to the Haditha cases. ALL of our Marines have been persecuted by NCIS. There's no other way to describe it. Inadequacy aside, if an organization, entrusted with so much power over those who fight for us, doesn't provide and assure them protection of their "rights" and a fair and impartial investigation; which obviously did not happen...then the military should never have allowed charges to be filed against them. The very foundation of this country is being trampled on by the enemy from afar, and within. And our own politicians and military brass contribute to it. I'd like to know how many cases NCIS has investigated where they haven't suggested preferral of charges against someone. So far, It seems that everyone in the military, according to NCIS, is guilty. I'd love to know how many with no charges and how many with charges preferred. And just think...ALL of the cases of those accused and charged were decided by an organization proven to be inadequate, inefficient, sloppy, and abusive with its power. The Founding Fathers would turn in their graves to see the shame brought upon the values and protections they envisioned for Americans and their government. It's time for NCIS to be accountable!

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos