House hands toll road a setback
By: EDWARD SIFUENTES and DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writers | ∞
Proponents of a six-lane toll road running through San Onofre State Beach said they were handed a severe a setback Thursday when a U.S. House committee voted in favor of an amendment requiring the project to adhere to more restrictive state regulations.
The amendment, inserted into a defense spending bill, would eliminate previous legislation that exempts the toll-road project from state laws that could block its construction.
A coalition of environmental groups oppose the project, known as the Foothill South toll road, because it would cut through the park, a popular spot for campers, surfers and environmentalists. Those who support the toll road say it will ease traffic through south Orange County.
Jennifer Seaton, a spokeswoman for the Transportation Corridor Agencies, the Orange County agency planning to build the final 16-mile leg of the Highway 241 toll road that would cross four miles of the park, said the new amendment could become a roadblock.
"It's certainly a significant setback," Seaton said. "It will potentially make it a lot more difficult to build this road. And it jeopardizes 20 years of careful environmental planing. It could definitely add time. It could add money. It could torpedo the project."
Rep. Susan Davis, D-San Diego, wrote the amendment that could block the project. A spokesman for Davis said the congresswoman wants the project to abide by the same rules as other road projects.
"She's not trying to kill the project," said Aaron Hunter, a spokesman for Davis. "She wants them to follow the same rules as everybody."
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista, a road supporter whose district includes the proposed toll road area, said the amendment could endanger the project.
"Her amendment, if it stands, threatens to deny the residents of Southern California the benefits of an important regional transportation asset," Issa said in a written statement.
The measure passed on a partisan 30-27 vote in the Armed Services Committee. It will now move to the House floor before going to the Senate.
A spokeswoman for an environmental group opposing the project said the amendment was a positive step.
"What this says is, this project has to abide by all state laws like all other transportation projects in the state," said Traci Verardo, director of legislation and policy for the California State Parks Foundation in Sacramento.
The foundation is an advocacy group that lobbies for or against projects depending their impacts on state parks.
"There are a lot of hurdles in front of this (highway) project," Verardo said. "And this makes it clear that there will be no fast track for this toll road. It is not a done deal."
Seaton, of the transportation agency, said planners had always intended to seek permission from the California Coastal Commission and other state agencies to build the highway.
"We haven't avoided any of the state processes," she said.
But Seaton said agency officials had been counting on the option of challenging an unfavorable state decision on the grounds that they had received federal approval for a project that is on federal land. The state park is leased from Camp Pendleton.
"This muddies the waters a little bit, and sets up a situation where a state decision could potentially prevent the construction of the road," Seaton said.
That's the way it should be, Verardo, of the foundation, contended.
"A project like this should not get special treatment," she said.
The foundation acts as a watchdog for California's extensive system of 278 state parks, including several prominent ones in San Diego County, that span 1.5 million acres.
The 600,000-acre Anza-Borrego Desert State Park in eastern San Diego County is the largest in the system, and for that matter the largest state park in the continental U.S. San Onofre State Beach in North County is California's fifth-most visited state park.
Verardo said the group views the toll road's extension as one of the most serious threats to parks anywhere in the state.
"It would, in our minds, completely take the park off-line," Verardo said. "It bisects the entire park. It's hard for us to imagine how visitors to this park could continue to have a natural experience, to experience solitude, with a six-lane toll road running next to San Mateo Campground."
She said the road would run on top of archaeological resources, habitat for 11 imperiled species and a scenic canyon popular with hikers and bird watchers.
Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Corona, who supports the road, said the amendment was a serious blow to the project and blasted Davis for recommending it.
"I am appalled by the fact that a member of Congress, who's not from Orange County, is trying to stop a key regional transportation project at the behest of special interest groups and in spite the project's strong support among local elected officials," Calvert said in a statement.
-- Contact staff writer Edward Sifuentes at (760) 740-3511 or esifuentes@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Carter: wrote on May 11, 2007 6:00 AM: I was a juror on a case involving San Onofre State Park. The park rule at that time was that only one car per camp space was allowed. It was brought out in court that the justification for the rule was that the park was a part of the escape route for the people who worked at the plant and it was best to not congest the area with additional automobiles. I wonder if that law is still in effect, and if it was taken into consideration by the 20 year boondoggle study in prep for the project. And the boondoggles go on - and on - and on. Wonder why?
freetrader wrote on May 11, 2007 8:09 AM:Finally, the federal government is going to get out of a state's rights issue and let California use its own greener environmental standards for constructing this toll road. I don't like D.C. telling me how dirty my air should be. It's a local issue and should never have become federal, except for the conniving developers who wanted to rape the most beautiful coastline land we have for the sake of money.
Diane wrote on May 11, 2007 9:27 AM:Isn't it ironic that Ken Calvert (CORONA) has the gaul to say he's 'appalled' that Davis is not from Orange County. If he'd care to check a map, Corona is farther than San Diego, and also not in Orange County.
scott wrote on May 11, 2007 10:18 AM:This is great news. This toll road threatens land that is better served by public use and should be preserved as one of the last open coastal areas for camping and surfing left in Southern California. Trestles and San O are treasures that should be preserved no matter what the traffic looks like.
John wrote on May 11, 2007 12:15 PM:Issa, the car alarm manufacturing congressman, is a supporter of a toll road. What surprise!! More cars more car alarms.
Concerned-1 wrote on May 11, 2007 12:17 PM:As concerned as I am about better transportation systems, building a road through this particular area absolutely irks me. And, yes, keep the feds out of our business. After bilking Californians out of billions in gas taxes, they have no right to tell us how and where we should build roads. San Onofre is a special place in California...let's keep it that way.
Happy camper.... wrote on May 11, 2007 8:35 PM:Thank you Susan Davis et all! Keep that road out of our park!
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement


