As party chair, a senator's delicate balance on immigration reflects GOP dilemma
By: JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS - Associated Press | ∞
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Mel Martinez, tapped as party chairman to help expand the GOP's appeal to Latino voters, is struggling to bridge seemingly intractable divides among Republicans over immigration.
In months of intense closed-door talks among White House officials and key Republicans and Democrats, the Florida senator's main task has been to referee between warring GOP factions.
He has prodded business-minded moderates like himself who are eager for a politically palatable compromise to partner with hardline conservatives who are wary of one.
His bottom line: that immigration laws need to be fixed and Republicans politically can't afford to be seen as the party standing in the way of such changes.
Senators were racing to get an immigration agreement by Wednesday, when Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., otherwise will bring up a measure passed last year with strong Democratic support -- but one opposed by most Republicans.
Negotiators were close to a deal that could be announced as early as Tuesday, said officials of both parties, speaking not for attribution because the talks were ongoing.
Squeezed by both sides, Martinez' precarious spot in the immigration debate reflects his party's dilemma on the divisive issue.
Strategists are eager to grab hold of the fast-growing Latino segment of the electorate and stay in good graces with powerful business groups that depend on a steady flow of immigrant labor. But then they risk alienating conservatives with an overly permissive immigration policy.
A perception in the 2006 election that the GOP was blocking a compromise on immigration "was very hurtful in many places, and it showed itself in the outcome," said the Cuban-born Martinez.
"People who had a harsh view of this lost," he said.
His job as GOP party chairman has required some difficult political acrobatics for Martinez, 60, whose own experiences have shaped his views on immigration. He left Cuba as a teenager as part of Operation Pedro Pan, a Catholic Charities-organized effort that helped 14,000 unaccompanied minors escape to the United States in the early 1960s.
Last year, Martinez broke with his party and joined Democrats to help write and pass a measure that would have given many of the nation's estimated 12 million illegal immigrants a chance at citizenship.
Now he has turned against his own bill in favor of an approach with more conservative appeal that would allow legalization, but only after steep border security and worker identification measures are put in place. Critics of the compromise say it would create a guest worker program that could essentially bar some immigrants from ever gaining permanent legal status.
It's a formula designed to get more Republicans on board, although one that also risks alienating the Democrats and GOP moderates who have in the past been the strongest supporters of an overhaul.
Rather than writing legislation, Martinez says this year he has been a "conciliator" among disparate GOP blocs in the talks -- from conservative Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona to moderate Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania. Instead of advocating his own position, he has spent long hours prodding Republicans to draft a compromise the majority of them can tolerate.
"When things seems to break down, then I have, on occasion, said, 'Look, this is too important -- we can't let it fail.'," Martinez said.
Still, Republicans who oppose any changes beyond stricter border enforcement and crackdowns on illegal immigrants are highly critical of Martinez, saying he is not representing his party. They accuse him of grasping for nonexistent political advantage by pushing measures that violate the party's basic values.
"Senator Martinez is operating off an illusion, and that is that somehow the Republican party can flourish off of rewarding illegal behavior," said Rep. Brian Bilbray, R-Calif., chairman of the Immigration Reform Caucus, a coalition of conservative Republicans and some Democrats who are opposed to allowing illegal immigrants a chance at gaining legal status, which they derisively brand "amnesty."
Meanwhile, liberal groups pushing for legalization for the undocumented workers and a guest worker program that allows new immigrants a path to citizenship accuse Martinez of squandering his unique opportunity to get it done.
Last week, a coalition of immigrant advocacy groups launched a Miami-based ad campaign criticizing Martinez for backing away from last year's Senate-passed bill. They say he has adopted a more punitive approach to immigration.
"He has the kind of position to get the White House to move this proposal in the right direction. He may be the only one who does and we don't think he's done that," said Clarissa Martinez of the Coalition for Comprehensive Immigration Reform.
Immigration analyst Tamar Jacoby of the Manhattan Institute calls Martinez the "center of gravity" in the bipartisan talks.
"He exemplifies the dilemma of the party," said Jacoby. His "instinct -- not just because he's an immigrant, but because he knows what's good for the economy and what's good for the country -- is to say, 'Lets figure out a rational way to do this.' But like the party, he's got these yahoos riding his coattails -- a loud, vocal 25 percent of the party that doesn't want to do anything -- and he has to deal with them."
More Stories
- Clinton, Obama back Senate Democrats effort to cut off funds in Iraq
- As party chair, a senator's delicate balance on immigration reflects GOP dilemma
- Hospitalized Ashcroft pressured by White House in 2004 on wiretaps, Senate panel told
- Ending 12 years in power, Chirac says goodbye to French electorate
- Bush reels in gifts from admirers, but Cheney's haul was even bigger
Advertisement
The Majority of Americans wrote on May 16, 2007 1:32 PM:who pay these LOSERS in office, say NO AMNESTY and CLOSE THE BORDERS! What part are they to stupid to understand?
They don't care what wrote on May 16, 2007 2:31 PM:the voters want. BOTH republicans and democrats cater to the business people who donate to their campaigns. I wish we could vote them ALL out of office. The dems are selling the middle class down the river just as fast as the republicans did.
I wonder if they would wrote on May 16, 2007 2:59 PM:sing a different tune, if the tax payers said no more State or Federal taxes until they obeyed the laws.
Write and call wrote on May 16, 2007 3:37 PM:your law makers, they are smoking dope in Washington DC again! NO AMNESTY!
Frank Trammell wrote on May 18, 2007 12:52 PM:No amnesty for Illegal Immigrants! Close our borders! Listen to the people or we will vote you OUT!
LARRY PAUL wrote on May 28, 2007 5:32 AM:BREAKING OUR LAW it cannot be rewarded the citizens of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA are under a visious attack by librals or some one world gov people to erase our boareds remmeber when you do that no more consitution aside from that we need to stop the on slought of people we don't know who is amoung us HOW do you have HOMELAND SECUREITY withpeople who some whom are criminals and this is just a ploy to 1 break unions 2 lower american working wage 3 what happens when our boys from iraq @ afganastan come home thos means fuer jobs poorer medical care you get the idea AMERICA should not be for sail not by bush not by congress this is not what we fought for
Harold wrote on Jun 12, 2007 9:22 PM:Legal status after one day even if ordered deported, Taxpayers pay for illegal immigrants lawyers, Gang members (30,000) eligible for citizenship, English not required for 9 years, temporary visas that can be renewed indefinitely, Illegal aliens do not have to pay back taxes, Authorized earned income tax credit, American tax payers pay Mexicans in Mexico educational benefits, and health care, only 200 miles of proposed 800 mile boarder fence funded, all applicants for immigration waiting for years go to the end of the Line, top priority for security and prosperity treaty (SPP)to erase boarders with Canada and Mexico given fast track,
Nadya wrote on Aug 18, 2007 5:48 AM:Hello Mr. Senator, I was born in a land where civil and religeous wars and dictatorship rule for almost more than half ov the century, as i got my chance to come here, i tried my hardest to make my life, but now here im going no where coz i dont have enuff money to pay my college, im out ov status and i know they're gonna throw me out, so is that so called slogan America for peace stands no where and was i not born with the same mind in global era as an american person, could you do something about our miseries
tiredofthis wrote on Oct 2, 2007 4:30 PM:NO AMNESTY. It is unbelievable that illegals can sue companies after sustaining an injury on the job, and get compensation. Not paying their taxes so WE have to. When you come into and stay in a country illegally, you are BREAKING THE LAW. Plain and simple. Illegals are not entitled to any rights. What makes them think that laws and rules don't apply to them? Drive them out!
Greta wrote on Oct 2, 2007 4:35 PM:I'm sick of this. NO AMNESTY. What makes illegals think that the laws and rules of this country do not apply to them? No, we cannot do anything about your "miseries" if you are too lazy to let your visa expire. You are going nowhere because you have no right to. Get them all out!
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (9980)
- TEMECULA: Protesters line intersection (6082)
- ESCONDIDO: 3 DUI arrests, 46 impounds at checkpoint (4916)
- ESCONDIDO: City's dreams of an 'upscale' downtown may be dying (4625)
- ESCONDIDO: Victim's roommate recalls July 4 shooting, friends gather for vigil (4417)
Advertisement





