UCAN says power line more than San Diego needs
By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | ∞
A new power line isn't needed until 2018 to keep the lights on in San Diego County, and it's not needed at all to deliver electricity from the energy-rich Imperial Valley, according to a consumer group's analysis set to be filed today.
San Diego Gas & Electric disputed the report, saying the county faces an electricity shortage in 2010, and the utility says it needs a major transmission line ---- the Sunrise Powerlink ---- to plug the county into Imperial Valley's power in order to comply with a state mandate to secure 20 percent of its supply from non-fossil-fuel sources by 2010.
The proposed $1.3 billion, 150-mile superhighway of electricity would run from El Centro to San Diego. With wires draped from towers as tall as 150 feet, it would wind through Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, Ranchita, Santa Ysabel, Ramona, Rancho Penasquitos and Carmel Valley.
The proposed power line has drawn criticism from environmentalists and residents, as well as groups of local utility critics such as the San Diego-based Utility Consumers' Action Network, which released the new analysis.
Michael Shames, executive director for the group, said the 1,000-megawatt power line is a far bigger project than is needed to fill a projected 354-megawatt gap 10 years from now. A megawatt is the standard measuring unit for electricity and is generally enough for 1,000 homes.
"They've chosen a 15-room mansion in La Jolla," Shames said, when what is needed is a "three-bedroom house in Mission Valley."
Shames said by telephone Thursday that his group has an alternate plan that would save $93 million a year compared to the proposed Sunrise line, which would cost $156 million a year.
San Diego Gas & Electric disputed the report's conclusions and said state energy officials have long said the new line was necessary to keep the region's power flowing.
"The conclusions aren't surprising, because Mr. Shames has opposed the project all along," said Stephanie Donovan, a spokeswoman for the San Diego-based utility. "But it flies in the face of what energy experts have said."
Last summer, for example, the California Independent System Operator, the agency that operates the state's power grid, concluded that the power line was needed not only for San Diego County, but also to make it easier to move electricity around the state.
On the other hand, a separate agency has determined the line won't be needed in 2010. The Division of Ratepayer Advocates, an agency within the California Public Utilities Commission that reviews utility projects on consumers' behalf, made that determination earlier this month.
San Diego Gas & Electric stood by its assertion Thursday that the line was necessary.
"Sunrise is needed in the time frame that we have said, which is by 2010," Donovan said. "Suggesting that this project is not needed and that other alternatives can avoid it is like putting your finger in the dike and hoping it will hold."
Shames said the group plans to file a 300-page report with the California Public Utilities Commission today.
On Thursday, the group provided the North County Times with a draft 48-page summary of the report's conclusions, reached in a 16-month study conducted by Berkeley electric transmission analyst David Marcus. When reached late Thursday, the utility had not seen the report.
Donovan said she believed it was unfair to publicize the report before the utility had an opportunity to see it.
In the draft, the San Diego watchdog group concludes that an existing superhighway of electricity known as Southwest Powerlink could be called upon instead of Sunrise to deliver Imperial Valley's solar and geothermal power. Those existing wires generally run along Interstate 8 between Arizona and San Diego.
The report states that San Diego Gas & Electric's recent conservation efforts and signing of contracts for small power plants that fire up on hot days are enough to ward off a 2010 shortfall.
Over 40 years, San Diego Gas & Electric expects Sunrise to cost the state's electric ratepayers a total of $6.24 billion. As in buying houses, consumers end up paying much more than the face value of power lines over time. But according to the consumer group's report, the real cost would be $760 million higher.
"After lengthy study, UCAN has determined that SDG&E's power line project is not justified," the report concludes. "The utility has misled regulators and the public about costs, overstated the need for the project, and has ignored smarter, more economical alternatives."
It would be better and cheaper, Shames said, to build more wires along another electricity superhighway, the one on the coast that connects San Diego Gas & Electric's system with Southern California Edison's.
"If you need a new road, widen this one," Shames said. "Don't build a new highway."
The group also suggests building several small power plants in San Diego County that could be called upon in summer when air conditioners are humming relentlessly.
That wouldn't work, Donovan said.
"Following the UCAN recommendation would be a blueprint for serious energy problems for the region," she said.
Donovan said the utility will rebut the report in a June 15 filing with the Public Utilities Commission.
The commission is scheduled to hold hearings on the project in San Diego in July.
Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 740-5442 or ddowney@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
It is all about empire building wrote on Jun 1, 2007 8:16 AM:SDGE does not have to concern it self with the bottom line, so they can spend lavishly and build an empire, they will get paid regardless of how well the company is managed. If is like the sheriffs department. They also have no incentive to rehabilitate prisoners, their prime goal is to build an empire. Remember when the Sheriff tried to shut down the honor camps (hugely successful camps) so that he could build more jails. It is all about empire building
Tony wrote on Jun 1, 2007 9:41 AM:Watch what happens if SDGE doesn't get their way - unscheduled "maintenance and repair" of power stations resulting in rolling blackouts in the San Diego area. Then they will shrug and say that they should have listened. Enron made billions from manipulating the system after deregulation. Why should we expect SDGE to do anything less? They only care about their monopoly and profits.
Common Sense wrote on Jun 1, 2007 11:57 AM:Does anyone remember the recent rolling blackouts? Why would we not plan ahead?... especially if it is true about usiong less fossil fuels? In a supply and demand market, they should not be able to get increases if they power supply is availble...?
2010 isn't far away wrote on Jun 1, 2007 12:17 PM:WE need more reliable power coming into our area, and if we are to be economically viable as a region, we need to get plans in place now. I don't support the proposed route through the wilderness for the cables, but some of those in opposition are living in denial.Blackouts are more than an inconvienience; they cost industry money and can put lives at risk (imagine being on a ventilator, and having the electricity go off) Of course SDGE should plan for increased capacity above what is needed immediately (2010), as the population in our region continues to grow (which it will). Let SDGE do the demand estimates for the future, but certainly we should not let the cables go through the wilderness.In the meantime, each of us should do whatever we can as individuals to curtail our consumption.
Once Again! wrote on Jun 1, 2007 12:22 PM:Can't you see it coming? They'll put it off and put it off until we have a crisis looming, then SDGE will reap the benefit. How short-sighted must these bureaucrats be?
Retrogrouch wrote on Jun 1, 2007 1:42 PM:Local solar and wind power, if developed, should negate the need for the Sunrise link. The only reason for the link is that SDG&E expects to have surplus power to sell. No public land for power lines to subsidize mega corporations.
Reardon wrote on Jun 1, 2007 2:55 PM:I'll pay more attention to UCAN when they prove THEY can provide energy, instead of words!
SolarWise wrote on Jun 1, 2007 4:22 PM:Solar power is the way to go here in Southern California. It would make more sense to spend that 1.3 billion on adding solar power to 65,000 homes (assuming each home costs $20,000 after $10,000 tax rebates). SDG&E needs to get with the program of alternative energy. We the people need to push for solar and alternative powers, which will eliminate the need for new transmission lines.
SolarWise wrote on Jun 1, 2007 4:23 PM:Solar power is the way to go here in Southern California. It would make more sense to spend that 1.3 billion on adding solar power to 65,000 homes (assuming each home costs $20,000 after $10,000 tax rebates). SDG&E needs to get with the program of alternative energy. We the people need to push for solar and alternative powers, which will eliminate the need for new transmission lines.
Reardon wrote on Jun 1, 2007 7:11 PM:Solar power does not require the cooperation of SDG&E -- a simple phone call to any one of several world-wide major corporations will bring solar power to you very quickly. Expensive...yes. But probably worth it if you can get a return-on-investment during the time you will be living in the house. Don't blame SDG&E if you can't or wont pick up the phone.
Solar Here, You can too wrote on Jun 2, 2007 12:24 AM:I installed top of the line solar on my house, 3kw system. AFter rebates and tax credits I am into it for under $12,000. It is generating at least $70 worth of power per month. Payoff at current rates is 15 years, of course as the price of electricity rises payoff will be shortened. GO TO HELL SDGE, they hate solar, but are forced under state law to accept it.
to: Solar Wise wrote on Jun 2, 2007 12:27 AM:Good point, teh 65,000 systems would produce over 1000 megawatt hours per day, exceeding the power line capability. Problem is that it would cut into the SDGE empire. SDGE hates solar with a passion, there is nothing in it for them.
engineer wrote on Jun 2, 2007 5:59 AM:You should all surf over to UCAN's website and read their report. Reardon, this comment is mostly for you.
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement