Legal officer says no one questioned Haditha deaths

By: MARK WALKER - Staff Writer | Tuesday, June 5, 2007 10:12 PM PDT

CAMP PENDLETON -- No commanders sought a probe into the deaths of two dozen Iraqi civilians in Haditha in the days and weeks after the incident, a Marine Corps legal affairs officer testified Tuesday.

The testimony from the officer, Maj. Carroll Connelly, came on the sixth day of a hearing for Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, one of four officers from Camp Pendleton's 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment charged with dereliction of duty for failing to order an investigation into the killings that would draw worldwide condemnation when brought to light several months later.

The hearing will determine whether Chessani, the highest-ranking officer charged with wrongdoing arising from the Haditha incident, will be ordered to court-martial.

Connelly said his bosses would routinely direct him to make inquiries into Iraqi civilian injuries or deaths resulting from contact with U.S. troops.

But that didn't happen in the Haditha killings, he said, because an initial, inaccurate report said the deaths stemmed from a roadside bombing followed by a gunbattle with insurgents. Civilian deaths in combat situations generally did not warrant investigation, Connelly said.

It would later be shown that 19 of the 24 Iraqis were killed inside homes where no insurgents and no weapons were found.

"My understanding, at least at the time, was that they were out in the open," Connelly said of the first report, which said 15 civilians had been killed as a result of the bombing and small-arms fire. "(The report) says they were out moving past the vehicles."

Connelly was serving as one of the 1st Marine Regiment's command staff attorneys when the slayings took place on Nov. 19, 2005.

Chessani was the battalion commander until he was removed from that post in the fallout from the incident when the unit returned in April 2006.

The civilians died after Marines from the battalion's Kilo Company reported they were under small-arms attack following the bombing and were engaged in a fight with their attackers. The slayings occurred over a roughly four-hour period after the bomb killed a lance corporal and injured two other Marines.

The first five Iraqis to die were all young men, none of whom were killed by the bomb or in any crossfire. They died after being ordered from a car that drove up after the bombing and were shot at close range, according to testimony from one of the Marines who took part in that shooting. The victims were later determined to be students on their way to a college in Ramadi.

If the initial report had in any way indicated that the civilians were killed inside their homes where no insurgents nor weapons were found, Connelly said he would have raised questions.

He also testified that a formal demand for an investigation from the Haditha town council eight days after the killings was never brought to his attention. He said he also did not know until much later that the dead included several women and children found lying in supplicant positions inside a bedroom.

"It was something different than what I had always pictured," Connelly said.

Chessani's attorneys maintain that he fully reported everything he knew about the incident, relying on that first report. It was up to commanders above him to order an investigation if they thought one was warranted, the attorneys contend.

Over the course of the hearing, prosecutors have repeatedly tried to show that Chessani learned a lot more about the killings in the days immediately after the first report. Prosecutors have focused many of their questions around the town council complaint that was presented to Chessani, suggesting that he failed to fully report that development to his superiors.

The killings did not get formally investigated until last spring and only after questions were raised by a Time magazine reporter who had heard of complaints from survivors of the dead.

Also testifying Tuesday in a base courtroom, where the Chessani hearing is playing out as his family members watch from seats directly behind him, was 1st Lt. Mark Towers, who previously served under Chessani.

"He's a godly man," Towers said of the lieutenant colonel, whose defense team includes two attorneys from the Christian-based Thomas More Law Center of Ann Arbor, Mich. "I know he has a lot of integrity ... and I know he took care of his Marines."

The hearing will conclude this week when Chessani is expected to make an unsworn statement that will not be subject to cross-examination. Attorneys will then present final arguments.

From there, the hearing officer, Col. Christopher Conlin, will write a report to Lt. Gen. James Mattis stating whether he believes the case should move forward to court-martial or that some other action should be taken. Mattis is commander of Marine Corps forces in the Middle East and as such is the "convening authority" over the Haditha prosecutions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The other officers accused of dereliction of duty are Capts. Randy Stone and Lucas McConnell and 1st Lt. Andrew Grayson. A pretrial hearing for Stone took place last month. The hearing officer who presided over Stone's case has yet to announce whether he believes Stone should face court-martial.

The first pretrial hearing for one of three enlisted men charged with murder in the Haditha deaths is scheduled to start Monday when Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt is due in court. Sharratt is accused of three counts of unpremeditated murder and could be sentenced to life in prison if ordered to trial and convicted.

The two other enlisted defendants charged with murder are Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich, who led the platoon, and Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum. Their hearings are scheduled to take place later this summer.

-- Contact staff writer Mark Walker at (760) 740-3529 or mlwalker@nctimes.com.

Next
12 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

Franklin wrote on Jun 6, 2007 12:40 AM:Monkey no see, monkey no hear, monkey no do: The new motto of the USMC.

Pam wrote on Jun 6, 2007 7:53 AM:When are we going to take the time to hire attorneys for the murders of several thousand of our young Military heroes? When you think about it those sneaky, hidden IEDs that kill and injure our young people are weapons of mass destruction! I think that having over three thousand killed that should definitely constitute murder charges.I am really about sick of all of this crap!! Stop the court hearings, let our men live in peace. I think that our own government and the politicians that are now running for offices are the guilty ones. They are using young people for their own selfish cause and that is wrong. They are the ones who have caused Americans to protest the war and they are the ones who have put doubt into Americans minds. What don't people get about our being attacked and what don't they get that these people have the means to do it again and they hate us!? I think it is time for the Americans to put on their patriotic faces and demand that these trials come to an end. If it were their son or daughter on trial I am sure they would feel the same way. I guess you just have to know someone in the Military to care. I guess we deserve what we get when they come back over here and kill thousands of people because this whole thing is just telling them what a bunch of hicks live here and how much they care about our well being and how they take so for granted their own personal lives. You know, I would think that those with children would especially support this war! It is their lives that will be the most affected. I also think the Military personel involved in this has either been bought off or they just don't care. If we are doing this here, then lets get the charges going over there. Start rounding up the murderers over there and put them on trial. I have personally had several men that I know killed over there and I would like to see their deaths mean something.

laughing wrote on Jun 6, 2007 9:47 AM:So he should be thrown under the bus for trusting his men, that they give him the proper information in their reporting of the situation so he can make proper decisions on his end? That makes NO sense. And to top it off, once he does know about the situation he reports what happened to HIS superiors and THEY made the decision not to investigate. The matter at hand is should Chessani go to a court marshal.... NO.

simple arithmatic wrote on Jun 6, 2007 9:47 AM:In Iraq, for U.S. forces, there is no relief to the imprinted battle behavior known as "mission accomplished" or "victory." Therefore, servicemembers frustrated in situations where there is no physical enemy to defeat will seek out other means to fill the conclusion void left through the "ghost tactics" now popular in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. By proxcimity, non-combatant civilians are most frequently the targets of U.S. forces. The frequency and severity of retaliatory behaviors toward non-combatant civilians is propotionate to frequency and severity of a unit's casualties.

Can you say . . . . . wrote on Jun 6, 2007 11:24 AM:rotten to the corp

John1 to Simple Arithmetic wrote on Jun 6, 2007 11:38 AM:Your statements are not supportable.

simple arithmatic wrote on Jun 6, 2007 1:24 PM:They are support through history John. Set down your Koolaid and read.

NO MORE ATROCITIES wrote on Jun 6, 2007 2:31 PM:The incessant blogs on here insisting on the innocence of the men charged with murder and coverup and worse show a misplaced sympathy for the inexcusable. Let's let the duly constituted military court and jury determine guilt or innocence, not the half baked guess work of biased bloggers. To simply dismiss all charges would be a crime itself.

Jack wrote on Jun 6, 2007 2:46 PM:Simple Arithmetic: Well said!

John1 to Simple Arithmetic wrote on Jun 6, 2007 3:01 PM:Prove your statement with objective data. Set down your spell check, it's not doing you any good.

Jake wrote on Jun 6, 2007 7:35 PM:If you all believe that our military forces purposely "murder" innocent civilians I guess that is your right. But why would you think that way. Our forces in Iraq and Afgahnistan are engaged with a rouge enemy (aka as terrorists) and the civilized rules of engagement (can you believe war is civilized) do not cover war with terrorits. Our forces do what they have to do to protect themselves. If you do not like it then ask your President to withdraw our forces from all foreign bases.

USMCDad wrote on Jun 6, 2007 11:12 PM:"the dead included several women and children found lying in supplicant positions inside a bedroom" ... shot by 5.56mm ammunition ... hmmm ... wonder how that happened??? Oh just normal combat casualties I guess. Let's excuse all acts by our servicemembers ... that's patriotism, correct??? Or we could use the other excuse: The enemy does really bad things, so we're justified in doing so too!

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos