Hearing concludes for officer accused of not probing Haditha deaths

By: TERI FIGUEROA - Staff Writer | Tuesday, June 12, 2007 8:23 AM PDT

CAMP PENDLETON -- The highest-ranking officer to be charged in connection with the deaths of 24 Iraqis in Haditha appropriately reported the killings and was not criminally derelict in failing to call for an investigation, the officer's attorney argued Monday as his 10-day hearing ended.

housead
Special Report



"This case does not warrant criminal charges," said Robert Muise, a civilian attorney representing Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, in court. "The actions he took were in good faith."

Chessani is charged with dereliction of duty for what military prosecutors maintain was his failure to fully investigate the deaths, which followed a deadly roadside bomb explosion on a chaotic day of battle on Nov. 19, 2005.

Chessani was commander of Camp Pendleton's 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment at the time. His attorneys contend Chessani reported everything he knew about the incident immediately after it happened.

Aside from Chessani, three other officers face dereliction charges for not ordering a probe of the deaths. Three enlisted men from the battalion face murder charges.

Military prosecutor Lt. Col. Sean Sullivan argued that a deeper probe of the deaths -- which included the killings of two women and five children in homes near the bomb site -- should have been an obvious step.

"I think it was a conscious, willful decision not to investigate," Sullivan said. "That event screamed out for investigation."

Both sides made their closing arguments Monday at a hearing to determine if Chessani should face a military trial. Hearing officer Col. Christopher Conlin will make his recommendation to Lt. Gen. James Mattis about whether the officer should be sent to trial.

Chessani could face more than two years behind bars and dismissal from the service if he is tried and convicted.

Nineteen Iraqis died inside homes that Marines, who were under gunfire right after the explosion, stormed in search of insurgents. Five other civilians were killed after emerging from a car that drove up shortly after the explosion, which killed a lance corporal and injured two other Marines.

Charges arising from the Haditha deaths make up one of the largest criminal cases in the more than four years since the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

Prosecutors have argued that Chessani's faith in the Marines under his command led him to reject the idea that the fatalities were anything but casualties of war.

"You want to believe in your Marines," Sullivan said, "but that doesn't negate your duty to investigate."

Sullivan also pointed to a letter that the mayor and members of Haditha's city council supplied in English to Chessani in the days after the shootings, asking for an investigation.

"The one man that should have been asking the hard questions was the battalion commander," Sullivan said.

Muise, Chessani's attorney, said the letter from Haditha leaders was a propaganda tool, and that some of them had ties to the insurgency.

He also argued that many high ranking military officers saw the dead as collateral damage in an attempt to ferret out insurgents who may have been hiding in the homes, and that the incident raised no red flags for Chessani's superior officers. None of them called for an investigation either, Muise said.

The case surrounds one of two incidents in which Camp Pendleton Marines are accused of killing at least one civilian. Several men from another unit are charged with killing a civilian in the village of Hamdania in 2006.

In the Hamdania case Monday, military prosecutors dropped assault charges they had levied against a Camp Pendleton sergeant who is also charged with kidnapping and killing a retired Iraqi policeman.

Murder and other charges still remain in place for that Marine, Sgt. Lawrence Hutchins, who prosecutors call the alleged architect of the Hamdania slaying plot.

In the Haditha case, a media report in March 2006 on the deaths eventually spurred a criminal probe and a formal look at how the report of the civilian deaths was handled. In the wake of the investigations, Chessani was stripped of his command when his unit returned from Iraq in April 2006 .

Chessani's attorney said it was "crucial to put his decisions in context" of the situation and the number of battles and firefights that day.

"It's very easy for all of us to sit here today and second guess his decisions," Muise said.

Muise argued that stripping Chessani of his command -- which essentially ended his once-bright military career -- was a severe enough punishment.

After court, Muise said he has been told that, prior to the Haditha incident, Chessani was on track to become a general someday, and had received a number of glowing reports about his work. Chessani is eligible for full retirement in November, when he reaches 20 years of service.

Chessani's is the second of the four officers accused of dereliction to have finished up a hearing to determine if the case should go to trial. Last week, a hearing officer recommended that the government dismiss criminal charges against Capt. Randy W. Stone, and handle his case with administrative punishment.

-- Contact staff writer Teri Figueroa at (760) 631-6624 or tfigueroa@nctimes.com.

Next Previous
11 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Jun 12, 2007 12:30 AM:Am I the only one sick to death and totally disgusted with the arrogance of the prosecutors in all of these csaes? Who in blazes does Sullivan think he is to stand there and say HE "thinks" it was a conscious and willful decision on the part of Lt. Col. Chessani? How have these prosecutors missed the FACT that Haditha and Hamdania were insurgent run towns with tribal leaders only an idiot would believe? As for the charges against Sgt. Hutchins; they were dropped over a week ago. It was reported on a Gainesville, GA. internet site. Seems to me it's newsworthy yet the only news of it came from the East Coast?

Ami L wrote on Jun 12, 2007 2:27 AM:It wasn't their fault that they did that because a marine was killed. If that happens to me, I will surely going to do that. It's a lawwful order and it's not Chessani's fault that he did not investigate that. It's in the rules of Engagement and it states there that if a marine who's life under threat, he can defend himself. It's in the law. That's what they were trained for. As a marine, i support any of them no matter what happens.

AWtootoobad wrote on Jun 12, 2007 6:14 AM:Women and children in fetal positions killed with with gunshots to the head implies murder which SCREAMS for an investigation. Insurgent towns? So what! This was not Fallujah 1 or 2.

AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Jun 13, 2007 5:19 PM:To AWtootoobad: Yep...NCTimes, "Accused Haditha Marine Passed Polygraph": " Instead, the forensics from the government investigation show that one of the slain men was apparently hiding inside a closet and bullet holes are scattered on a wall throughout that room. The defense dispels the allegation of an execution-style slaying." Whaddayamean, "Insurgent towns? So what!"? How ridiculous to ask that. We're not talking about innocent 'families'. We're talking about INSURGENT tribes. We're talking about hours of fighting. Get Real! Go over there and sympathize if that's where your allegiance lies. Yep! I'd like to see you in that "So what!" town. How fast can you run???

To AW4 wrote on Jun 13, 2007 9:55 PM:Who administered the polygraph?

AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Jun 13, 2007 10:47 PM:To the post at 9:55PM June 13: From what I've read it was NCIS. The Special Agent, Nayda Mannle, who became lead agent in Haditha is the one who testified that Sharratt passed the polygraph. If you know otherwise please share. I just can't fathom that an American? would take the results of a ploygraph and the word of a Marine and totally ignore them because Iraqi's told a different story. Especially when the officers over these men have admitted they did not trust the word of the people (insurgents) in Haditha. That's pretty disgusting. Maybe Nifong was there lending his "expertise" to NCIS!

AWtootoobad wrote on Jun 20, 2007 6:12 AM:AW4cryinoutloud, Too bad the charges were not DISPROVED. Prove the women and children were armed threats. Prove the UNARMED passengers in the car needed to die. I have been in an insurgent country and all the lovely venues around the An Hoa Basin. I have fought for hours, days and weeks but I did not shoot or shell every "possible" insurgent/insurgent sympathizer I saw. I run pretty fast to contact.

Helene wrote on Jul 2, 2007 6:35 AM:Our men are there fighting for us and they must do what they think is correct at the time. It is totally unfair to bring any of them to trial. Why doesn't the prosecutor put his head on the line and see what he would do in the same case. Drop all charges

JR wrote on Jul 2, 2007 10:05 PM:AW4 should have been friends with Cheney and Bush - like Scooter Libby. It might have helped her friends get out of jail.

AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Sep 3, 2007 1:14 AM:To 'AWtootoobad: If you ever come back here I hope you enjoy eating your words. I think you spoke too soon. As of today, September 3, 2007, you'd best start eatin'!!! I don't care where you "say" you've been. Are you a Marine? If so, where's your Corps de Esprit? Remember that? God help you if you are ever accused by the enemy as these Marines have been. You haven't stood by your own. You are a disgrace.

AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Sep 3, 2007 3:15 PM:To JR: I WISH!!!

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos