Rebate program for solar switch taking hold
By: QUINN EASTMAN - Staff Writer | ∞
Janice Smith shows the solar panels control boxes.
WALDO NILO Staff Photographer
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery
NORTH COUNTY ---- After a confusing start for the California Solar Initiative this spring, more homeowners in San Diego County have been applying in the last few months for the rewards that come from installing solar panels.
The state Public Utilities Commission in 2006 approved $2.9 billion in rebates to homeowners and businesses, encouraging them to install solar power over the next decade.
A set of new approval requirements put in place at the start of the year slowed the rate of applications for rebates on residential retrofits, compared with last year. But officials at the California Center for Sustainable Energy, which administers the rebates in the San Diego region and holds monthly workshops for homeowners, say that the number of applications has been increasing every month as people learn the ropes.
Local firms that specialize in installing solar systems agree.
"There was a hiccup at the beginning of the year," said Ned DeWitt, regional sales manager for Borrego Solar, one of the oldest solar system installers in California. "But things have picked up since then."
Some homeowners and small business owners around San Diego County say they have been waiting and watching to see if the financial incentives become stronger.
"Until the payback period comes down to less than 10 years, many people aren't going to be interested," said Nick Sherman, a sales manager at Irvine-based solar installer GenSelf.
For example, Valley Center veterinarian Deb Hofler said she has been interested in installing solar panels for years but balked because the price of batteries could almost double the price of a system for her business. For a country vet, having a backup power supply available in a pinch was critical.
In contrast, Valley Center neighbors Oliver and Janice Smith decided 2004 was the right time to install solar panels. The Smiths had hefty electricity bills because they need to pump water from a well for 1.5 acres of orange trees.
They used to pay a few hundred dollars per month in the summer, compared to the average monthly electricity bill in inland San Diego County of about $70 per month, according to San Diego Gas & Electric Co.
They report their bill for all of last year dropped to $350.
Grid-connected solar panel systems run under the principle called "net metering," which says that the owner can get credit for sending electricity back to SDG&E, but can't end up making money over the course of a year.
"One of the things I get a kick out of is watching the electric meter run backwards as fast as I have ever seen it run forwards," wrote Smith, an engineer who works for a medical equipment company, in an e-mail.
Through Home Depot, the Smiths bought a 6-kilowatt system costing roughly $65,000. A kilowatt is about the amount of power needed by a hair dryer. They expect the investment to pay off in about a decade, because they got about half the cost back from state rebates and a federal tax credit.
"Obviously I am still paying off the system with the money I am not sending to SDG&E," Smith wrote.
The California Solar Initiative is structured so that the rebates people can get gradually fall as more people adopt solar. People who install solar this year won't get the same level of rebate that the Smiths did.
From $4,500 per kilowatt in 2004, the rebate has dropped to $2,500 per kilowatt this year and is expected to continue falling.
The decline is designed to wean the solar industry from the subsidy and provide an incentive to join in sooner. The rebates come from a surcharge on residential and commercial utility bills, about $12 per year for residential customers.
The solar industry has criticized a requirement imposed at the start of 2007 that homeowners getting rebates sign up for time-of-use metering, which appeared to cause confusion.
In other parts of California, the requirement could make homeowners pay more than they would otherwise for energy used in the middle of the day, when demand is high.
Although the Public Utilities Commission removed the requirement last week, both the solar industry and consumer advocates said it had less of an impact in San Diego County.
"San Diego Gas & Electric doesn't really have time-of-use on the residential side," said Michael Shames, exective director of the Utility Consumers Action Network. "It only comes into play on the commercial side."
Still, applications have fallen off in the area covered by SDG&E since January.
The Sustainable Energy center reported more than 100 residential applications in the first four months of 2007, but that compares to more than 1,000 installations in 2006 and several hundred for each of the previous three years.
The Public Utilities Commission took over the residential retrofit rebate program from the state Energy Commission, which had run the similar Self-Generation Incentive program since 2001.
Solar installers say that applying for a rebate became more difficult ---- more paperwork and more strenuous calculations ---- when the PUC took over.
Although rebates from the state are expected to fall, in February, legislation was introduced into Congress to dramatically increase a federal tax credit homeowners get for installing solar panels.
Instead of a previous cap of $2,000, the new proposed limit is $1,500 for every half-kilowatt of capacity up to 30 percent of the total cost, so a system the size of the Smiths' could garner its owner $18,000.
The then Republican-controlled Congress failed to pass a similar bill in a previous session.
Also adding uncertainty, SDG&E's February proposal to flatten out its rate structure starting in 2008 may blunt the incentive to install solar because it could decrease bills for households using more electricity than the average.
Contact staff writer Quinn Eastman at (760) 740-5412 or qeastman@nctimes.com. Comment at nctimes.com.
Previous story:
Business, governments embracing solar
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2007/05/20/business/news/12_90_925_19_07.txt
Useful solar Web sites:
www.findsolar.com
www.energycenter.org
www.bp.com/solarsavings.do?categoryId=3050485
www.noelectricbill.com
More Stories
Advertisement
Floyd wrote on Jun 17, 2007 11:11 PM:I can't afford $65,000 for a solar system, but I can afford a $20,000 system. Instead of rebates and tax credits, how about a plan in which the solar installer bills the government for the difference between the $20,000 I can pay and the $65,000 cost of the complete system?
Unfortunately wrote on Jun 18, 2007 12:17 AM:The price of solar panels is not really coming down, due in large part to German and Asian commitments to solar, they are buying all the panels up! we nee dto subsidize this industry to a greater extent. Did yo know that if the 1.3 billion that SDGE wants to spend on the Sunrise Power link was invested in local solar we would have more net electricity, and it would be 100% clean power. Why is SDGE not doing this? because solar is a threat to their empire.
Subsidy and Empire... wrote on Jun 18, 2007 7:48 AM:We don't need the government to subsidize anything. That's just another way the politicians are going to put money in their own pockets. A rebate is just fine. If you can't afford it right now, wait a little longer and it will be more affordable. It's like LCD televisions. As far a SDGE running an empire, it's somewhat true, but dependable power is also needed. Granted, Solar is clean and "free", but we need sources that are reliable too. As far as an empire, I would expect electricity prices to drop over the next decade as new sources of energy are developed.
To Unfortunately wrote on Jun 18, 2007 8:46 AM:"Unfortunately" you raise a good point. A greater investment by SDGE would reduce the need for the Sunrise Power link. What a concept! Of course, they will do to solar panels just what Detroit did to the EV1.
Why do we wrote on Jun 18, 2007 10:29 AM:taxpayers subsidize this? Do these folks pay us back from the money they save on energy? I don't think so. Another case of to much money in the hands of government. Let me guess the solar industry pays heavey contributions to the politicians who thought up this scheme.
Grow up wrote on Jun 18, 2007 11:53 AM:Why do we: people moving onto solar benefits everyone as the money goes there instead of to more polluting power plants.
Wes wrote on Jun 18, 2007 12:07 PM:Neither of you know what you are talking about. My system was $43K. After Rebate it was $23K out of pocket. After Federal tax credits, it came down to $21.5 out of pocket. Since the Fed has upped the credit allowance, it could have come down below $20K. I planned on a 12-15 yr break even. It's turning out to be around 10 yrs. Oh, and I made 38kWh yesterday, but used 40. I think that's a good trade. The key is to find financing that allows you to trade your monthly bill (averaged over as long as you can track it) for the financing payment. As the cost of electricity rises, the payoff gets quicker. Kind of like "go big early" when buying a home; because it gets cheaper every day.
Jon wrote on Jun 18, 2007 10:21 PM:I self-installed a system that generated 20 kwh yesterday, I am $11,000 out of pocket after rebates and credits. I only use 12.5 kwh per day so I am building an electric car that will cost 3 cents a mile to run. The car will cost less than $6,000 to build from off the shelf parts. To hell with SDGE, to hell with big oil. My carbon foot print will be sero, while the goverment does little or nothing. You have the paower to do it too.
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (10858)
- TEMECULA: Protesters line intersection (6838)
- ESCONDIDO: Border Patrol employee in custody after hatchet attack (5711)
- ESCONDIDO: 3 DUI arrests, 46 impounds at checkpoint (5613)
- ESCONDIDO: City's dreams of an 'upscale' downtown may be dying (5140)
- HOUSING: Local median price up for third straight month (45)
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (44)
- ESCONDIDO: Border Patrol employee in custody after hatchet attack (34)
- FALLBROOK: Peruvian chocolatier living sweet American dream (29)
- ESCONDIDO: Victim's roommate recalls July 4 shooting, friends gather for vigil (27)
Advertisement
Videos
Advertisement




