State fishing for trouble in Delta
By: North County Times Opinion staff | ∞
Our view: California must act to ensure that fragile fish species doesn't swim away with our water
The recent decision to shut down the pumps that transfer water from Northern to Southern California to protect an endangered fish was, forgive the pun, a watershed event. For only the second time (the first being in 1994), the Southland's residents were put on notice that, under certain circumstances, the well-being of a fish could have precedence over their water needs.
Clearly, this won't do. We can't abide cutting off half the state from its water supply, even temporarily. We need to start exploring options that will allow us to avoid a future choice between fish and people.
Experts believe that the health of the Delta smelt, a minnowlike fish with a one-year life span, is a prime indicator of the overall health of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, the largest estuary on the West Coast. If they're right, then the Delta is in trouble. And if the Delta is in trouble, so is San Diego County, as we rely on the Delta for 60 percent of our water.
In 1996, California Department of Fish and Game surveys counted more than 3,000 smelt. This year, they counted only 30. It is this dramatic drop in surveyed smelt, which seems to have started in 2000, that prompted the Department of Water Resources late last month to temporarily turn off the pumps that, while acting as a giant spigot for Southern California, also kill endangered smelt.
Biologists don't yet know exactly why the smelt population is plummeting, but the pumps are only one suspect. Others include toxins and invasive species that may have robbed the smelt of the food it needs to survive.
Great pains are being taken to protect the fish. The pumps have screens, and Department of Water Resources employees scoop up smelt and haul them by truck back to the Delta waters. But some fish still die in the process. With the numbers of smelt so low this year, turning off the pumps was the easiest, most immediate action that state officials could take to protect the few remaining smelt in the Delta.
We wish we could report a quick fix on the horizon, but it's not to be. Gov. Schwarzenegger tasked a blue ribbon commission with delivering a comprehensive plan for saving the Delta, but its recommendations are not expected for several months. State officials are looking for other ways to move the water around, but no specific plan has been adopted.
One idea that is making a comeback is the long-discussed Peripheral Canal. First proposed in the 1940s, the 40-mile canal would bypass the Delta to take water directly from the Sacramento River to the California Aqueduct. With an estimated price tag that could reach $10 billion, if built it would be one of the most expensive public works projects ever.
The idea of a peripheral canal was approved by the Legislature, but voters, fueled by regional animosities and environmental fears, rejected it in 1982.
A lot has changed since 1982. Southern California has added 12 million residents and ---- if the fate of the smelt is any indication ---- not building the canal has been no guarantee of environmental health for the Delta.
Also, as the success of last year's bond initiatives show, Californians seem to be in the mood to finance large infrastructure projects. Although legally forbidden from tapping into the $5.4 billion in water-bond money we approved in November 2006, the governor and legislators should definitely think again about the second canal.
http://nctimes.com/articles/2007/06/18/news/top_stories/61707181720.txt
Drought and the state's declining share of Colorado River water make the Delta a more important source of our water than ever before. Several lawsuits also threaten to make future stoppages more likely. Our water future, and that of the smelt, depends on finding a solution to this problem.
More Stories
Advertisement
Wake up People! wrote on Jun 23, 2007 10:42 PM:The Delta smelt doesn't sound like much does it? But it's an indicator species just like the canary in the mines used to be. When the smelt are gone you can assure yourself that the environment and the Delta are probably irreparably damaged. Since that is the source of drinking water for millions be ready for mandatory conservation- and quit planting those stupid lawns.
Howiek wrote on Jun 24, 2007 7:08 AM:This could be just the beginning. The continued drought along the Colorado River as well as the developing drought in Northern California does not bode well for Southern California and certainly San Diego, which is located at the END of all the pipes: water, gas, and electrical! Who knows, maybe San Diego will have do the same draconian measures that Las Vegas has/is going through—NO outdoor plantings that require any water! It just may leave San Diego with just three options; maximum conservation, desalination, and recycling, or maybe a combination of all three. Just don’t get your hopes up that desalination is going to happen anytime soon.
To Wake Up wrote on Jun 24, 2007 8:39 AM:We can't just conserve our way to maintaining adequate water supplies. This approach has been tried for oil and it has failed. Conservation per se is not a complete solution. Moreover, not all water is being used for lawns as you suggest. Fact is the population is outstripping our water supplies. Fish & Game should not be able to unilaterally shut off Delta water because of minnow and jeopardize water for public safety, agriculture. The focus should be on accessing more water, de-salination plants, etc.
Oh brother! wrote on Jun 24, 2007 11:20 AM:Over 50% of water is used for landscaping. That is a well documented fact. Water, like oil, is a limited resource. It can be stored, conserved in spite of what others say. Check out groundwater levels in the Central Valley. They are down over 35 feet! That's right 35 feet below normal! So there is 'no more water'. Desalination is a potential source but the technology for affordable production of desalinated water is not here just yet. You really need to wake up! It isn't growing populations that are stripping the water source, it's our unbridled unintelligent use of it!!!
John wrote on Jun 24, 2007 8:32 PM:End of the real estate boom. No water - no more houses. At some poit there won't be enough left to flush your toilets. Hey BIA - there really are consequences to over development.
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement