What is contempt of Congress and how does it work?
By: JESSE J. HOLLAND - Associated Press Writer | ∞
WASHINGTON -- Congress and the White House appear headed for a showdown over President Bush's decision to invoke executive privilege to deny documents to House and Senate committees and prevent former aides from testifying about the firing of U.S. attorneys.
Lawmakers, in turn, have threatened to hold subpoenaed officials in contempt of Congress.
Here are some questions and answers about the contempt of Congress process:
Q: What is contempt of Congress, and why would Congress want to use this power?
A: Congress can hold a person in contempt if that person obstructs proceedings or an inquiry by a congressional committee. Congress has used contempt citations for two main reasons: (1) to punish someone for refusing to testify or refusing to provide documents or answers, and (2) for bribing or libeling a member of Congress.
Q: Where in the Constitution does it say Congress can hold someone in contempt for not testifying?
A: It's not in the Constitution. It is an implied power of Congress, just like executive privilege is an implied power of the presidency.
Q: Is there any legal underpinning for a contempt of Congress citation?
A: Yes. The Supreme Court said as early as 1821 that without the power to hold people in contempt of Congress, the legislative branch would be "exposed to every indignity and interruption that rudeness, caprice, or even conspiracy, may mediate against it."
Q: What is the process for holding someone in contempt of Congress?
A: The procedure can start in either the House or the Senate. The two chambers do not work together on contempt citations. It only takes one chamber to refer a person to be prosecuted for contempt. A contempt citation can start with a subcommittee, a full committee or in the full House or Senate.
If it starts at the committee level and a person refuses to comply with a committee subpoena, the committee has to vote to move a criminal contempt citation forward. It takes a majority vote for the citation to move to the full House or Senate.
Q: What happens next?
A: Once the full House or Senate has a contempt citation, it must be debated by the full chamber like any other resolution. It is subject to the same filibuster and procedural rules as any other House or Senate resolution. It takes a majority vote to be approved.
Once approved, the House speaker or the Senate president pro tem then turns the matter over to the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, "whose duty it shall be to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action," according to the law.
Q: Is the U.S. attorney required to prosecute?
A: Depends on whom you ask. The law says the U.S. attorney "shall" bring the matter to a grand jury.
However, the House voted 259-105 in 1982 for a contempt citation against EPA Administrator Anne Gorsuch but the Reagan-era Justice Department refused to prosecute the case.
The Justice Department also sued the House of Representatives, saying its attempt to force Gorsuch to turn over documents interfered with the executive branch. The court threw the case out and urged negotiation between the executive and the legislative branches. The Justice Department did not appeal the ruling, and the Reagan administration eventually agreed to turn over the documents.
Q: When was the last time a contempt of Congress citation was brought to the House or the Senate floor?
A: The last contempt of Congress prosecution was of former Environmental Protection Agency official Rita Lavelle in 1983. The House voted 413-0 to cite her for contempt of Congress for refusing to appear before a House committee. Lavelle was later acquitted in court of the contempt charge, but was convicted of perjury in a separate trial.
Q: What is the punishment upon conviction for contempt of Congress?
A: Contempt of Congress is a federal misdemeanor, punishable by a maximum $100,000 fine and a maximum one-year sentence in federal prison.
Q: Is the contempt of Congress power used often in fights between the legislative branch and the executive branch?
A: Since 1975, 10 Cabinet level or senior executive officials have been cited for contempt for failure to produce subpoenaed documents. The 10 officials are Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Commerce Secretary Rogers C. B. Morton in 1975; Health, Education, and Welfare Secretary Joseph A. Califano, Jr., in 1978; Energy Secretary Charles Duncan in 1980; Energy Secretary James B. Edwards in 1981; Interior Secretary James Watt in 1982; EPA Administrator Anne Gorsuch, known as Anne Gorsuch Burford after a 1983 marriage, and Attorney General William French Smith in 1983; White House Counsel John M. Quinn in 1996; and Attorney General Janet Reno in 1998.
The White House and Congress came to negotiated agreements in each case before criminal proceedings could begin.
Q: Does the president's executive privilege trump Congress' contempt citation?
A: That's the big question that both sides really don't want answered. In the past, neither side has been willing to let the matter go up to the Supreme Court for fear that their side would lose.
If Congress loses, then it would have a hard time investigating future presidents, Republican and Democrat. If the White House loses, the current president and future ones can expect numerous requests from a reinvigorated Congress, whether controlled by the Democrats or Republicans.
Q: Is there anything the president can do once someone has been convicted of contempt of Congress?
A: Contempt of Congress is a federal crime like any other. The sitting president has the authority as chief executive to commute or pardon anyone of any federal crime.
- Sources: Congressional Research Service, Senate Judiciary Committee, Associated Press interviews.
More Stories
- Bush invokes executive privilege to deny Congress testimony from former White House aides
- What is contempt of Congress and how does it work?
- House committee chairman urges Bush to tell Congress why he commuted Libby's prison sentence
- Alaska's Stevens, longest-serving GOP senator, under investigation
- Analysis: Giuliani's campaign path takes an unconventional turn in an unusual race
Advertisement
steve wrote on Jul 10, 2007 8:14 AM:What a worthless government! Taking up valuable time with in-fighting. There's so much more that needs to be done and yet we get this petty crap from government and the public puts up with it. Start impeachment and start throwing the bums out of congress! Unfortunately it's the same crap only more of it.
Bob wrote on Jul 10, 2007 12:31 PM:14% of Americans have a great deal or quite a lot of confidence in Congress. A 14% Congressional confidence rating is the all-time low for this measure. Previous low point for Congress was 18% in 1991 through 1994. Do we all remember the House banking scandal and the health care debacle in 1994 that got the Dems thrown out of congressional control for the first time in 50 years? Nancy Pelosi and her partner in crime Harry Reid are wishing they had those numbers today.
To Bob wrote on Jul 10, 2007 3:06 PM:Don;t forget htat almost half the Cngress is taken up by obstructionist Republicans. These polls relect Americans total disgust with them. Most people are aware that the Democrats do not have the numbers in the Senate they need to override vetoes or to end cloture. The group preventing any progress is all Republican.
Surely you jest. . . . wrote on Jul 10, 2007 6:07 PM:"The group preventing any progress is all Republican. " Thanks for a good laugh tobob
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement