Slow pace of border fence raises questions about larger White House plan

By: ELLIOT SPAGAT - Associated Press | Friday, July 13, 2007 10:12 PM PDT

SAN DIEGO -- Bulldozers are rolling again on the U.S.-Mexico border, moving hundreds of tons of dirt to make way for a 16-foot steel fence in an area that once was the most popular crossing for illegal immigrants.

But before the construction resumed recently, the 14-mile project in San Diego was stalled for years by legal challenges from environmentalists, budget problems and difficulties buying land. Those delays are now raising doubts about a government plan to extend fencing to 370 miles of the Mexican border.

The Bush administration, under pressure to tighten border security, wants all 370 miles done by the end of next year.

"If past experience is any guide, it will cost a lot more than anyone expected and take a lot longer than anyone is talking about right now," said David Shirk, director of the University of San Diego's Trans-Border Institute, which studies border issues.

The Homeland Security Department has yet to say where it will build fences in California, Arizona and New Mexico. And the only proposal made public so far -- for Texas -- drew immediate criticism and is being reworked. Opponents worried it would limit access to the Rio Grande, damage the environment and infuriate Mexicans who cross the border to shop and visit.

The 1,952-mile border stretches over sensitive terrain, including two national wildlife refuges in Arizona. And negotiations for land owned by scores of ranchers and Indian tribes may be challenging.

Democratic Rep. Silvestre Reyes of Texas predicted the construction of so much fencing will be a "huge problem," noting opposition among many residents and even some Border Patrol field leaders who would prefer the money be spent on manpower and equipment.

The San Diego fence, tilted 45 degrees at the top to deter climbers, starts at the coastline and stretches 14 miles inland. Construction began in 1996, and there are still five miles to go.

Until the mid-1990s, illegal immigrants had crossed in droves. They would slip across the border and huddle on U.S. soil as the handful of Border Patrol agents assigned to the area watched from a distance. When night fell, they ran for it.

"It was a never-ending battle, and we were losing very badly," said Don McDermott, a Border Patrol supervisor who worked the area in the 1980s.

The nine miles of fencing completed so far have had a dramatic impact, along with more manpower and stadium lighting. Arrests are way down in San Diego, but traffic shifted to Arizona deserts.

Those people who do make it across are increasingly desperate. More immigrants are attempting to swim across the border or crawl through crude tunnels, said Raleigh Leonard, supervisor of the Border Patrol's Imperial Beach station.

The final five miles of fencing in San Diego will cover some of the most rugged terrain and most sensitive habitats on the border. For example, to fill an area called "Smuggler's Gulch," crews are expected to move nearly 3 million tons of dirt -- enough to fill about 100,000 giant dump trucks.

Border Patrol officials say they need a fence in the gulch because its urban surroundings give agents limited time to catch people before they melt into the local population.

But environmentalists worry that shifting dirt will spill north into a federally protected estuary, disrupting a key stopover for more than 370 species of migratory and native birds.

A 2005 law giving the federal government authority to waive all rules prohibiting fence construction prompted a judge to dismiss a legal challenge to the San Diego fence. The law should help smooth the way elsewhere along the border, too.

Homeland Security spokesman Brad Benson said the agency wants to be a good environmental steward and will favor a "virtual fence" of sensors, radar and cameras in remote, environmentally sensitive areas and on tribal lands.

The government believes it can finish the 370 miles of fence on time and hopes to avoid the kind of pitfalls that delayed work in San Diego, Benson said. He said Congress has appropriated enough money -- $1 billion for fencing and other infrastructure -- to complete the project and that, unlike San Diego, the terrain will not be such a hindrance.

"Most of what we'll build is out in flat desert, and it's not that hard to do," he said.

Within the next few weeks, Benson said, the agency will put final touches on plans to complete the 14-mile San Diego fence and then solicit construction bids. Homeland Security also began a series of public meetings this week along the border to discuss the agency's plans to extend the fence to 370 miles.

Shirk, of the University of San Diego's Trans-Border Institute, remains skeptical: "It's a really, really big project that won't go so quickly."

Fast Facts

THE PROJECT: Bulldozers are making way for a 16-foot steel fence on the U.S.-Mexico border in an area of San Diego that was once the most popular crossing for illegal immigrants.

THE GOAL: The Bush administration, under pressure to tighten border security, wants to build a longer fence spanning 370 miles by the end of 2008.

THE PROBLEM: The San Diego fence was stalled for years by legal challenges from environmentalists, budget problems and difficulties buying land. That has raised doubts about the government's plan to put up more fencing.

Advertisement

13 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

DMann wrote on Jul 13, 2007 8:07 PM:They are not going to secure our borders, they will let the terrorist hit us again. And what will the answer be when the families of the slain ask why? Because we didnt want to incovenience people here illegally. And for those with an open border mentality, it obviously doesnt matter to you how many Americans are killed, just that we dont hinder the flow or money. For thats all this really breaks down to, American lives for money.

Skip wrote on Jul 13, 2007 9:11 PM:In over 10 years they cannot even finish the 14 mile fence. The environmentalists are so worried about a fence on the environment and yet they look the other way when the thousands of Illegals Aliens storming across our borders are creating havoc with all sorts of environmental concerns. Geeeez .......

Sensitive Terrain??? wrote on Jul 14, 2007 6:43 AM:The sensitive terrain is now swimming in garbage dropped by illegals. I've been to this area in AZ--it's literally covered in plastic water bottles, clothes, cans, diapers and garbage bags. A fence would save this sensitive terrain.

Period wrote on Jul 14, 2007 6:48 AM:When are we going to get it? The government will do nothing, nothing that really will slow the flow of illegal immigration. We, the middle class are constantly getting screwed and we do nothing about it. We work hard, too hard and our money is taken from us, given to the poor so they can have services we work hard for. We are merely a pawn for the rich and powerful. As long as the middle class, the majority is silent, this rich will control everything and keep “the slaves” coming.

Mike wrote on Jul 14, 2007 8:18 AM:I'm sick and tired hearing about how fence upsets Mexicans. No one cares! Bush's job is to enforce the laws of this country. The fence has been approved by Congress. Mr. President, please do your job by carrying out building this fence.

Deja Vu wrote on Jul 14, 2007 12:56 PM:Mr Bush! Tear down that wall!

What is taking so long? wrote on Jul 14, 2007 1:00 PM:I thought it originally was 800 miles of fence? Oh no, this fence will hurt the president's plan for the North American Union between Mexico, the U.S., and Canada. Who cares if this is not what the open border lovers want? This is what most law-abiding citizens want.

Stop The Invasion wrote on Jul 14, 2007 4:06 PM:The amnesty plan is to fake progress on securing the border while giving dual nationality to millions of Mexicans.

jack wrote on Jul 14, 2007 4:43 PM:Yes sir, we got this land fair and square, by killing off the natives! Illegal aliens are a real problem in Sand I Ego, just ask any Native American! Sure looks like the Berlin wall for all creatures great and small.

American woman wrote on Jul 14, 2007 4:56 PM:This is not a debatable issue!!!Congressman Duncan Hunter's 854 mile border barrier was ok'd months ago! what the heck happened to it? No excuses! It's time to take action against those who would continue to breach our borders. It's time to stop making excuses. Surely everyone knows by now that this foot-dragging is just a ploy to leave us vulnerable until the North American Union can be implemented. Wake up America! You are losing your country. This Bush administration is selling us out as fast as they can, now that they are being scrutinized. In August, the so-called "leaders" of Canada, Maexico and the U.S. will be solidifying the plan to destroy America! Are youy ready to give her up? I refuse to stand by and watch this plan become reality. If we have to fight in the streets, so be it.

America not NAU! wrote on Jul 17, 2007 10:58 AM:Secure the Border, secure the border secure the border, secure the border, secure the border, secure the border, secure the border, secure the border, secure the border, secure the border! This a soveriegn nation! Don't like it? Move to Mexico!

The REAL Larger White House Plan wrote on Jul 17, 2007 11:33 AM:is to create a North American Playground ("NAP") for multinational corporations. What ever happened to "by the People, for the People, of the People"? Liberals, Conservatives, Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians - even Communists - must unite against the powerful, ultra-rich elitists and self-serving ethnocentric special interest groups. I will not become the subject of an empire controlled by global business interests. Just like W's daddy used to say, "a New World Order." Not on my watch! Many of us are prepared for the next phase in the fight to maintain our sovereignty, civil liberties, and middle class. Impeachment: it's not just about Iraq anymore.

Yeah, now wrote on Jul 17, 2007 12:24 PM:it's an environmental and property issue. The Libs want eminent domain ensured IF the property could be better utilized, providing tax revenue for the area. I wonder how many of the property owners along the border wouldn't WILLINGLY sell a portion of their property to the gov to build the fence.? My guess would be none...and IF they won't, hey we always can fall back on the above referenced law. Second, environmental issues...the fence would do a LOT less damage than the millions of illegals and squatters in this country. Witness the FACT that upwards of 400 squatters camped in McGonigle canyon for over 20 years and the bleeding heart environmentalists didn't raise an eyebrow!!! Can't have it both ways, TYPICAL LEFT WING HYPOCRISY!!!

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, email addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos