Legal opinion leads to change in badge policies
By: JOHN HALL - Staff Writer | ∞
RIVERSIDE -- In response to a legal opinion issued by the California attorney general's office last week, Riverside County prosecutors as well as nonsworn employees and volunteers with the Sheriff's Department will no longer carry badges, officials said Monday.
"All (prosecutors) with existing badges must turn them in," Ingrid Wyatt, spokeswoman for the district attorney's office, said.
More than 200 attorneys within the office have badges, she said.
"We are in the process of collecting the badges," Wyatt said.
The change will not affect the more than 100 district attorney's investigators, who are sworn peace officers under California law.
The decision made by District Attorney Rod Pacheco is twofold, Wyatt said.
"It is first to prevent any confusion to the public," she said, "and also to restore the public trust that may have been lost through this entire situation."
Pacheco has not issued badges to any prosecutors who have been hired since he took office in January, Wyatt said.
In March 2006, then-District Attorney Grover Trask asked the state attorney general to look into reports published by The Los Angeles Times that there was misuse of honorary badges by members of law enforcement auxiliary groups in Riverside, San Bernardino and Los Angeles counties.
In the legal opinion published July 30, the attorney general's office concludes that there would be a violation of state law if a badge "would deceive an ordinary reasonable person into believing that it is authorized for use by a peace officer."
The attorney general's office also concludes the gift of an honorary badge does not give the person who receives it any peace officer power.
The opinion also states that, if the sheriff of any county issues a badge neglectfully, that sheriff -- as well as the county -- could be subject to civil liability for any injury resulting from the misuse of the badge.
Officials in Riverside County have reviewed their own practices regarding badges since the opinion was released.
The district attorney's office considered the option of having prosecutors turn in their badges to be framed or mounted in some way, but that will not be done, Wyatt said.
"It's a difficult thing for people who have been with the office (and had badges) for a long time," she said.
Most likely, Wyatt added, the office will design a new identification for prosecutors to carry with them to use in their official capacity.
Sheriff Bob Doyle said Monday that it is not an issue of if, but when and how badges issued to nonsworn employees in his department will be pulled back.
Doyle said last week that he has never issued honorary badges since he was elected sheriff and has tried to retrieve such badges from people who were given them by his predecessors.
He said his staff is working on the logistics of retrieving badges from employees such as community service officers and volunteers with the department, such as mounted posse members.
After the legal issue was announced, Doyle said he thought this would be the time to "clean up" the badge issue statewide. He called upon agencies to evaluate their use of badges by anyone other than a sworn peace officer.
Among those he said have badges but now, based on the new legal opinion, should not, are state correctional officers -- whom he said are not sworn officers -- county animal control officers and county supervisors.
County spokesman Ray Smith said Monday he has spoken to two of the five county supervisors about the issue.
"If the determination is made to give their badges back, they have no problem with that," Smith said of the two he had talked with.
-- Contact staff writer John Hall at (951) 676-4315, Ext. 2628, or jhall@californian.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
kuffup wrote on Aug 7, 2007 6:23 AM:State Correctional Officers are Sworn Peace Officer.Someone needs to check thier source.
rey wrote on Aug 7, 2007 11:46 AM:Get your facts straight! State Correctional Officers are sworn Peace Officers.
Astounded wrote on Aug 7, 2007 5:29 PM:This reporter needs to be educated in how to write clearly. I think he's trying to say the Sheriff (not educated in the Penal Code apparently) says that State Correctional Officers aren't Sworn Peace Officers (we are)...but the story is written so as to imply that the AG said so.
John wrote on Aug 9, 2007 7:28 AM:State Corrections Officers may be sworn officers, but they arent real cops. They are sure quick to pull their badge out and show you though....You would think with all the overtime and other things, they would buy their own.
hmn wrote on Aug 9, 2007 4:51 PM:Don't hate!!!they're always looking for good people to 'walk the toughest beat in the state'.they are worth every penny they get paid for a job millions wouldn't do and oh yeah, to make sure that those scums you don't want roaming your streets are kept lock and secure.
Sylvia wrote on Aug 28, 2007 3:21 PM:While State CO's may be called peace officers they are not in fact a Peace Officer per CA Penal Code 830. If you read the PC 830 - it will define a true Peace Officer and if i am correct "CO's" fall under CA PC 832(b)(2)(c).. which states Persons described in this chapter as peace officers who have not satisfactorily completed the course (POST) described in subdivision (a),as specified in subdivision (b), shall not have the powers of a peace officer until they satisfactorily complete the (POST) course - If i am correct CO's dont complete the POST training...... If i am not correct..please correct me.
mike wrote on Sep 6, 2007 12:36 PM:Sylvia, State CO'S fall under P.C. 830.5 not P.C.832. P.C. CO'S go through PC 832 during the academy to get powers of arrest and carry weapons. 832(b)(2)(c) pertains to other corrections officers not state CO'S. You need to read 830.5.
Paul wrote on Sep 7, 2007 12:13 PM:This reporter has it wrong, State Corrections officers are peace officers, they are entitled to a badge. On the other hand City and County Correction officers are a different story.
Laughing At You wrote on Jan 16, 2008 9:24 AM:Looks like John and Sylvia did their research before posting. They must believe everything they read! Before any other ... wants to post their knowledge, take Mike's advice and read PC830.5
Drew wrote on Mar 14, 2008 5:56 PM:Why the comments on Coreectional Officers - the article (and the original complaint) refers to attorneys and other civilian employees who were "gifted" sheriff's dept badges. DA Investigators are peace officers, attorneys are not. The reason is to ensure that ordinary members of the public are not deceived into thinking that those showing the gifted badges are not deceived into thinking that the bearer has peace officer powers.
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (9869)
- TEMECULA: Protesters line intersection (6024)
- ESCONDIDO: 3 DUI arrests, 46 impounds at checkpoint (4858)
- ESCONDIDO: City's dreams of an 'upscale' downtown may be dying (4565)
- ESCONDIDO: Victim's roommate recalls July 4 shooting, friends gather for vigil (4343)
Advertisement




