Hatoff's suit seeks $24M in damages

By: PHILIP K. IRELAND - Staff Writer | Tuesday, August 21, 2007 12:03 AM PDT

OCEANSIDE -- An ousted MiraCosta College administrator is suing the public college for $24 million, saying officials violated state labor laws when they fired her and accused her of failing to supervise workers and cooperate with an investigation into the illegal sale of palm trees.

The administrator, Julie Hatoff, filed the suit in May, alleging breach of contract, negligence, extortion, harassment and labor law violations. The lawsuit names the college, former President Victoria Munoz Richart, all seven members of MiraCosta's governing board and former trustee Henry Holloway.

A scandal erupted at the college in December 2005 when a whistleblower alleged that officials in the horticulture department were raising and selling palm trees for personal profit. The ensuing 17-month probe led authorities to charge one school employee, Alleen Texeira, with a single count of theft. A handful of other employees, including Hatoff, were disciplined or resigned.

A copy of the suit obtained by the North County Times last week shows Hatoff is seeking $14 million in general and special damages, as well as punitive damages of $5 million from Richart, and $1 million each from the board members who supported Richart -- board president Charles Adams and trustees Carolyn Batiste, Rudy Fernandez, Gregory Post and Holloway.

Hatoff's attorney, Tracy Warren, said Monday that her client would not comment on the lawsuit.

Jim Downs, a spokesman for Taxpayers Saving MiraCosta --- a group that has backed Richart and the board majority -- said the lawsuit is a waste of money and has little or no chance of prevailing.

Jonathan Cole, president of the Academic Senate and a supporter of Hatoff, said he was not comfortable offering opinions about the monetary details of Hatoff's suit.

A 36-year employee of MiraCosta College, Hatoff oversaw all educational programs as the top instructional administrator. She was one of several employees investigated by the college's private attorney during the palm-tree probe.

Hatoff was cleared of any criminal wrongdoing in the internal college inquiry; a separate investigation by the San Diego County district attorney's office also found no evidence of illegal activity by Hatoff.

College officials, however, accused Hatoff of failing to properly supervise employees and refusing to cooperate in the investigation. She was placed on administrative leave as vice president of instruction in August 2006 and dismissed from the post in June 2007.

Hatoff drew pay for her $200,000 cabinet-level job throughout her leave. She is still on the college payroll as a tenured professor of English on leave, college officials said.

In her 39-page lawsuit, Hatoff claims that Richart had "no credible evidence that Hatoff played any part in the palm tree incident, yet for over one year Richart led an entire college community to believe otherwise."

Richart abused her position to "satisfy her own personal agenda, which included forcibly and inexplicably ousting" Hatoff due to personal friction between the two women that arose after Richart took the reins of MiraCosta in summer 2004, the suit states.

The five trustees who are being sued for more than $1 million each are part of a board majority that supported Richart throughout her tenure at the college. In her suit, Hatoff said the trustees "blindly obeyed the self-serving mandates" of Richart, who negotiated a $1.5 million buyout of her contract in late June.

In regard to Hatoff's lawsuit, several legal maneuvers are in the works, including a motion by Hatoff attorney Tracy Warren to disqualify the law firm representing MiraCosta College. The motion to bar the firm, Stutz, Artiano, Shinoff and Holtz, is scheduled to be heard Friday.

Adams, the board president, on Monday offered his full support for the work of Stutz, Artiano, Shinoff and Holtz, saying the firm has served the district well.

On Aug. 31, a hearing is also set on a motion by college attorneys to dismiss Hatoff's case. On the same day, the attorney representing Richart will ask the court to dismiss the case against his client as a nuisance suit.

-- Contact Philip K. Ireland at (760) 901-4043 or on-line at pireland@nctimes.com.

Next Previous
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Get It Right wrote on Aug 20, 2007 11:58 PM:Wake up, Phil. Julie Hatoff is back in the classroom, teaching a full load; she's not "a tenured professor of English on leave." You got it right about Charles Adams, though. If Adams thinks Shinoff and friends have been serving the college well,it proves his incompetence and inability to preserve the public trust. Please resign, Mr. Adams.

Wow wrote on Aug 21, 2007 6:54 AM:Who pays your salary, Ireland? This hack piece is nothing but speculation. And you give the anti-recall folks a quote but not the pro recall group? Funny how this gets positioned on the same day it comes to light that the DA is investigating this board. Oh wait, the DA has been working this for a month, and NCT has chosen to ignore it until it broke on the board agenda. The people of north county deserve a fair press. That's why NCT subscription numbers keep dropping. Seems they editorialized a bit too soon against the recall.

caution needed in reading this article wrote on Aug 21, 2007 7:39 AM: Saying that "college officials" accused Julie Hatoff of something implies that many officials felt that way, but that is not true. Only former pres.Richart and a couple of her minions held that mistaken view.

Pat wrote on Aug 21, 2007 9:50 AM:When will this sad situation end? Everyone involved should sit down and ask, "What is best for MiraCosta College". This is not an indivudual trying to win, it is a wonderful college trying to return to its rightful place in the community. Take a deep breath and go forward. The students deserve better.

Settle this! wrote on Aug 21, 2007 10:45 AM:Hatoff did not do anything wrong and this board needs to settle this lawsuit in an equitable manner. Pay her legal fees, compensate her for the humility that Richart caused, and get on with getting rid of the lawsuits that Richart's investigation caused. The public has had enough of paying the bills for incompetent trustees.

$24 million??????? wrote on Aug 21, 2007 4:31 PM:If Julie Hatoff thinks she is deserving of $24 million, what does that say about the leadership at Miracosta. While she was likely treated unfairly by the former college president, she still drew her $200,000 salary (if this seems high, it's because Miracosta employees are the highest paid junior college employees in the state) to NOT work. If she feels mistreated enough to the point where she thinks she deserves $24 million, how can she stand to return to Miracosta and collect a paycheck? If there is one thing more ridiculous than Victoria Richart's settlement, it's Hatoff's lawsuit. Hopefully her lack of jusgement doesn't extend into the classroom.

to $24 wrote on Aug 21, 2007 5:54 PM:Get a grip. This is mere speculation. Her lawsuit has been publicly available for months, and specify no damages. Just because the NCT prints it, don't make it so. Nice diversion from the DA investigation story though. And you got hooked.

karen wrote on Aug 30, 2007 1:52 PM:Integrity, dedication, honesty, vigor, and intelligence. Julie Hatoff has it all, and she must be heard.

Reality Check wrote on Sep 5, 2007 6:11 AM:If Richart got $1.5M, Hatoff should get at least $3M.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos

Advertisement