Bond measure to be placed on Feb. 5 ballot
By: LORELL FLEMING - Staff Writer | ∞
MENIFEE -- Voters living in the Menifee Union School District will determine whether it should issue bonds to raise $31.4 million for school construction, board members decided Tuesday.
The issue would cover about half the cost of building three schools to cope with climbing enrollment in the district.
Menifee Union's board voted 5-0 to put the bond measure on the ballot for the Feb. 5 election.
Leaders of the district want to build an elementary campus near Canyon Lake, another on the south side of Menifee, and a middle school in northern Sun City.
Each elementary school is estimated to cost $25 million and the middle school is estimated at $40 million. Developer fees and state funds will be used to cover the rest of the cost, Menifee Assistant Superintendent Dan Wood has said previously.
If the bond measure passes, annual property tax bills for homeowners in the district would rise by $17.90 per $100,000 in assessed valuation on their homes, Wood explained to the board. The tax bill for a typical home with an assessed value of $300,000 would rise by $53.70. Assessed valuation is not the same as the market value of a home. In most cases, the assessed valuation is at or near what a buyer paid for a house.
Prior to the vote, board member Victor Giardinelli asked if the ballot language would include the estimated cost to homeowners.
"That's the bottom line for them: What is the price to them?" Giardinelli said.
Wood said that information would be noted in the arguments in favor of the bond. Prepared by district officials, arguments for and against the bond would be part of the information the county registrar of voters office mails to voters well in advance of the election.
Passage of the $31.4 million bond also means homeowners will be paying the $17.90 per $100,000 on top of $5.48 per $100,000 in assessed valuation homeowners are being charged to pay off a $14 million bond voters approved in 2002.
District officials originally estimated that the $14 million bond would cost taxpayers $22 per $100,000 in assessed valuation. However, because the community grew quickly and housing prices rose significantly, officials were able to greatly reduce the cost to taxpayers. That bond was used to pay for construction of new schools, including Evans Ranch and Oak Meadows elementaries, plus additions to older campuses, including Ridgemoor Elementary.
During the last two years, the district's enrollment grew by more than 14 percent, according to Wood. As of last week, the district's enrollment was 8,806, compared to 8,365 at this time last year.
Several thousand new homes are expected to be built in communities served by Menifee Union during the next several years, Wood said.
In Menifee, Centex Homes is building a housing subdivision just east of Menifee Road. As many as 1,100 homes are planned for that subdivision.
Near Newport Road in Menifee, about 2,200 homes are under construction as part of Audie Murphy Ranch, which is being developed by Woodside Homes and Brookfield Homes.
And in eastern Lake Elsinore, Pardee Homes is planning to construct 4,000 homes in the Cottonwood Canyon subdivision.
Contact staff writer Lorell Fleming at lfleming@californian.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Modern wrote on Aug 29, 2007 10:03 AM:They need a bond issue to get rid of the year round school that they have in this school district. Year round school is the worst for kids. You can't get into any rhythm as a student. Your off, your on, your off, your on.
Floyd wrote on Aug 29, 2007 11:59 AM:That $17.90 per 100K valuation sounds small until you discover the cost will be closer to $90.00 for a typical house.
Developers should pay wrote on Aug 29, 2007 2:48 PM:Developers should pay all the costs. The new schools are required due to the houses they have built and sold - making the general citizen pay transfers money from th citizen to the developer.
Oh please ... wrote on Aug 29, 2007 3:12 PM:...year-round school is a better use of public facilities. The archaic method of 9 months on and 3 months off is out-dated. The "rhythm" students get into on conventional rotation is they forget all they learned in the 3 months they are off. $25MILLION for a school is expensive and not to be taken lightly. A significant percentage of the total cost is going to be interest on the Bond. And whatever we build will need repairs that will require a new bond long before this bond gets paid off. Which serves to make the public pay the maximium amount of money to contruct and maintain a school over its life... and that is assuming we don't want to epxnd it or upgrade it in any fashion in the meantime. What a horribly burdensome method for doing things. Too bad we can't come up with a more efficient method rather can perpetuating financial burdens for future generations. Break the cycle !! Demand something more that what we've been doing for years and years. Raising taxes is just the simplest thing ...not the smartest in the long term.
Modern wrote on Aug 29, 2007 4:52 PM:I agree that the developers should pay for the schools, or at least part of it. But this Year round school thing is a bad idea. Year Round school is hard on parents and children. It creates conflicts in families if some children attend a school with a year-round calendar while another attends school with a traditional calendar. It can also cause problems for families when they want to make summer plans. And it interferes with activities outside of school -- including summer employment. I've never heard educators complain about learning losses during the summer. I can't see the reason for it other then massive over-crowding.
- Burst pipe causes 70-foot-deep sink hole in Carlsbad (2466)
- REGION: State green power plan will cost consumers billions (1444)
- HOUSING: Fraud victims struggle to regain cash, credit (1399)
- REGION: Talk of new immigration bill gets mixed reaction (1053)
- VISTA: Grocer brothers suspected of threatening former butcher (1033)
Advertisement





