Consultant: Menifee Valley should have enough funds to incorporate

By: BRIAN ECKHOUSE - Staff Writer | Wednesday, August 29, 2007 11:04 PM PDT

MENIFEE -- A week after Wildomar incorporation proponents successfully convinced a regional commission to put the question of cityhood on a ballot, Menifee Valley's cityhood bid got some good news of its own:

A financial analysis released Wednesday found the valley should have more than enough money to support itself as a city.

That's true in the would-be city's first 10 years of operation for all three boundary options proposed, but there are variations in the bottom line among the alternatives, said consultant Gary Thompson, who conducted the analysis on behalf of the Menifee Valley Incorporation Committee. The new city would encompass more than 40 square miles north of Murrieta and consist of Menifee, Sun City and Quail Valley, and -- depending on which boundary is chosen -- possibly portions of Romoland.

For the next month, the public is invited to comment on Thompson's analysis to the regional Local Agency Formation Commission, which determines whether cityhood bids can be put on the ballot. The analysis is available at the commission's Web site, www.lafco.org.

Once the public comment period ends, Thompson is expected to issue a final analysis before the question of cityhood reaches the commission. Incorporation proponents hope the commission will consider their bid in October, which would allow a vote on the question in June. The proponents hope to incorporate Menifee Valley as a city on Oct. 1, 2008.

"It's great: We're feasible," said Joe Daugherty, Menifee Valley Incorporation Committee's president. "We're ready to move forward."

One alternative proposes a city encompassing Menifee, Sun City and Quail Valley. Another option includes those three communities plus a chunk of Romoland to the north to about Rouse Road. Those options would create a city with a population between 55,300 and 56,300.

Those territories would be financially feasible as a city, Thompson said, but wouldn't be as strong as the third alternative, which includes an even wider swath of Romoland. That boundary would stretch to Mapes Road to the north and Briggs Road to the east, and have a population of about 60,500.

Of the third alternative, Thompson said: "You're looking at a reserve (fund) capacity of 20 to 30 percent depending on the year. Those are really good numbers."

The third alternative appears the most attractive, in part because it offers the most land for commercial development, which is key to boosting sales tax revenues, Thompson said.

"The population-driven revenues are higher, as well," he said.

The reserve would be built up through net savings, which is projected to happen in eight of the would-be city's first 10 years of operation under the third alternative.

Under Option 3, Thompson projects annual net gains of $1.8 million to $4.5 million in the first four years of operation, followed by a deficit of about $332,000 in Year 5. There would be annual gains of $17,000 to $2.1 million in years 6 through 9, then a deficit of $349,000.

But because the annual gains under the third option would be at least $1 million in seven of the first 10 years, the would-be city's reserve fund could absorb two years of deficits. At its lowest point, the prospective city's reserve fund would be $4.5 million. By year nine, the fund would be $14.9 million.

The fifth and 10th years would have deficits coinciding with the anticipated openings of new fire stations in the valley, Thompson said. Developer fees would pay for the stations, but the proposed city -- possibly with help from the county -- would have to cover operational costs, including salaries and benefits.

The other two options also have positive reserve funds, though at their peak, the reserve funds would be $8 million to $9 million -- not Option 3's $14.9 million.

The county would help a city of Menifee Valley in its first 10 years of operation by returning the net savings of the incorporation to the valley, which would range from $331,500 to $1.58 million depending on the boundary chosen.

In late July, the county Board of Supervisors approved transferring its annual net savings of Menifee Valley's and Wildomar's incorporation up to 10 years, if needed.

The regional commission -- not the Menifee Valley Incorporation Committee -- will chose a boundary for the valley, if it approves cityhood.

Daugherty prefers Option 3, though he noted his committee wouldn't take a position on the proposed boundaries.

"I like the one that's most feasible," he said. "I want to give us the one that gives us the greatest chance for success. We want to get cityhood."

Wildomar, which is between Lake Elsinore and Murrieta, is a little further along in the incorporation process. Last week, the commission approved Wildomar's bid, allowing the question of cityhood to reach voters, probably Feb. 5.

Both proponent groups share the same reason for incorporation: having local control of their growing communities.

"I think the community's ready for it," Daugherty said of Menifee Valley. "We've become urban now, and we have different needs (than before). The county doesn't serve urban needs; cities serve urban needs."

-- Contact staff writer Brian Eckhouse at (951) 676-4315, Ext. 2626, or beckhouse@californian.com.

Next
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Sarah wrote on Aug 30, 2007 7:49 AM:This is great! Our property values might actually go up if we become a city...this would be good timing for that to happen.

Edward wrote on Aug 30, 2007 9:03 AM:I look forward to the community incorporating. We definitely have the population to sustain a city unlike Canyon Lake. Local control is a good thing as opposed to regional control from the county.

Modern wrote on Aug 30, 2007 9:31 AM:I agree Sarah, I have a few friends in Menifee and it can sustain itself easily. Menifee is in a great location. Menifee and other cities like Wildomar need to break the chains of the County and become free.

Future Slum wrote on Aug 30, 2007 9:37 AM:whatever. You can dress up a pig. But its still a pig.

to future wrote on Aug 30, 2007 10:02 AM:... Menifee is not a slum, nor do i think that incorporation will create a slum. If anything it will help create a nicer place to live.

Stephanie wrote on Aug 30, 2007 10:54 AM:Menifee is a great place to live and raise children. Slum it is not!!

Bruce wrote on Aug 30, 2007 11:18 AM:Menifee is great. It's spread out, rural, and houses aren't built on top of each other (at least for now)...there's some breathing room. We also have a wonderful senior community.

future slum is... wrote on Aug 30, 2007 12:40 PM:menifee is a fine community to live, raise kids and retire, I have lived in this area for 30 years and love the rural feel of the farm land and horses and tract homes. congrats to menifee!! now with the mall going in and incorparation loming, we are on are way to a good future!!!!! horay for all of us menifee residents!!!

hey future slum wrote on Aug 30, 2007 1:19 PM:where are you from? Because if you lived in Menifee you would know it is far from a "slum". Try looking in your own neighborhood.

Peter wrote on Aug 30, 2007 2:14 PM:Hi, I have 2 years living in winchester (french valley area), actually i don't know the difference between been an incorporated city and unincorporated city, can somebody explain. i'll appreciate, thanks

menifee is wrote on Aug 30, 2007 2:20 PM:way too far out there....and way too hot for most people. Anything off the 215 is a dump. Much rather live in a smaller house in San Diego county.

Tim wrote on Aug 30, 2007 4:41 PM:Menifee will become the envy of southwest county in the coming years. We'll have the chance to show how a city should be operated.

hey menifee is wrote on Aug 30, 2007 5:12 PM:so you live in san diego then your closer to the dump down south

patricia wrote on Oct 7, 2007 11:13 AM:"Future Slum" they will know you were a prophet when it is too late!

Ann wrote on Apr 29, 2008 9:47 PM:This is ridiculous! Stand on your own two feet Menifee and stop expecting others to give you a handout so you can get what you want! “Something for nothing” is your mentality. If you want to be a city, I have no problem with that. But leave us out of your planning. The rest of us unincorporated areas have no problems now and do not want to be included in your plans. You are only including us because you can't financially support your own bid for city hood and you need our money. Leave Romoland and Sun City alone! If you are successful, we will become a slum because the area does not have a successful track record in managing cities (Perris, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, etc...)! I have no reason to believe Menifee will be any more successful than the rest. And BTW, your houses I do not consider rural. They are small track homes on top of each other! I’m rallying with other Romoland, Sun City and Lake Elsinore residents to vote NO on Measures F, G and H.

Ann wrote on Apr 29, 2008 9:51 PM:I see that my comments aren't making it on this site. I guess they want the public to believe that no one opposes this measure. That may be why I do not see other opposition comments. Well, there are other areas/sites where I've voiced opposition. And this just helps me renew my efforts to make sure the word gets out to Sun City and Romoland residents to VOTE NO for measures F, G, and H on June 3, 2008. You can't stop the opposition!

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos