A watery wake-up call

By: North County Times Opinion staff - | Wednesday, September 5, 2007 12:25 AM PDT

Our view: Drying up of delta supply must prompt conservation and market-pricing

If you think your water rates are too high, just wait. If you think you've been asked to make do with less water before, well, there too you're in for an unpleasant surprise. Late Friday evening in a Sacramento court, a federal judge decided a tiny fish needs the water we depend on even more than we do.

The dramatic ruling to reduce the water pumped through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta may or may not save the endangered delta smelt from extinction, but it almost certainly will mean a deep cut to Southern California's already evaporating water supplies.

Local water agencies haven't exactly been asleep at the switch, but there's far more they can do to encourage conservation and efficiency. With water supplies drying up in every direction, it's almost certain we'll soon be paying more for less water. But we'd feel a lot better about it if government was tapping the power of market forces to nourish innovation and punish water wasters across the state.

We're in the midst of a terrible drought, even after the storms that flashed through inland North County the last two weekends. Even worse is the eight-year drought along the Colorado River watershed, one of our two major supplies of imported water. And the Sierra snowpack, the other major water source for Southern California, is dwindling due to rising temperatures -- when it's not being stopped cold in federal court.

San Diego County farmers who buy cheaper, agricultural water from the Los Angeles-based Metropolitan Water District are preparing for a 30 percent cut in their supplies come Jan. 1, provided the coming months don't bring a miracle monsoon.

At least since the five-year drought that ended in 1992, the San Diego County Water Authority and other local agencies have, to their credit, been working to diversify our water portfolio.

To increase our storage capacity, the county Water Authority has pushed forward a $834 million project to add some 90,000 acre-feet of liquid insurance in case of an earthquake or other disaster. That Emergency Storage Project has brought the Olivenhain Dam and Reservoir to North County. It's also why crews are drilling a pipeline connecting that reservoir near Elfin Forest to Lake Hodges and drilling another pipeline to the San Vicente Reservoir in Lakeside.

To increase our water supply, the authority pulled off a historic, expensive deal with Imperial Irrigation District in 2003 to buy up to 65 million gallons of water otherwise destined to be dumped on desert farmland.

Before backing out last year, the Water Authority also supported Poseidon's proposal to squeeze the salt out of seawater off Carlsbad's coast. The California Coastal Commission is set to consider North County's desalination project this fall.

To encourage conservation, the Water Authority's biggest gains have come from encouraging customers to replace old toilets and shower heads with their low-flow, water-wise alternatives. These efforts and others have kept our demand roughly equivalent to that of 1991, despite a growing population.

The water agencies are flooding the airwaves with public service announcements urging people to take shorter showers, stop overwatering lawns and gardens, install sprinkler controllers, fix leaky irrigation systems and replace thirsty lawns with drought-tolerant plants.

The focus on landscaping isn't accidental: The county Water Authority estimates that we dump more than half of the water piped into our homes on our lawns, shrubs, gardens and trees. In a coastal desert during a drought, that's simply no longer acceptable.

There are dozens of good tips for conserving water supplies available on the Web. Please visit sites like www.bewaterwise.com, www.sdcwa.com, www.thegarden.org, www.laspilitas.com and www.treeoflifenursery.com for ideas.

Government has a big role to play in conservation, too, especially in ensuring that the price of our most precious commodity reflects its actual costs. That's why it should stop subsidizing water supplies to desert farming communities that grow thirsty crops. Our dry, inland valleys shouldn't be growing water-intensive crops like lettuce and alfalfa. A better, though endangered, model is that of North County's farmers, who largely switched to high-value crops to offset soaring water costs. Perhaps this latest crisis will also help Californians accept water meters that will help us sync supply, demand and cost.

One thing's for sure: The status quo is drifting away, and North County's future got a whole lot drier and more expensive after Friday's historic ruling.

More Stories

Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Howiek wrote on Sep 5, 2007 6:52 AM:North County Times forgot one of the more obvious solutions—water recycling/reservoir augmentation. Up to 85 million gallons a day could be saved by recycling our water—time for residents to wake up.

Wake UP People! wrote on Sep 5, 2007 10:05 AM:Quit the rampant building- however, if you must build, create grey water systems to water landscaping in new projects. Make drought tolerant planting mandatory. Quit watering golf courses with drinking water..and people give up your darn green turf lawns! Last, insist that Congress give agriculture the needed financial incentives to water in a more intelligent fashion.

Floyd wrote on Sep 5, 2007 11:50 AM:Not only should we be encouraging Poseidon to build a desalting plant in Carlsbad (near the power plant), we should be encouraging another water purifier at San Onofre (near the power plant) and a third near the Coronado Bridge (near the mothballed and re-startable Silvergate power plant). This will give us the water we need now and in the near future. As a bonus, it will give SDG&E a reason to restart Silvergate (as if the continuing power shortage isn't reason enough to get it running again!).

Chuckles wrote on Sep 5, 2007 12:17 PM:Note words used in the the prior 10:05 AM comment: "quit" and "make" and "give up" and "insist." Seems to me, this is more about controlling how people live than the well-being of a tiny fish.

Karl wrote on Sep 5, 2007 5:11 PM:WUP, good post. I don't think we will stop the new devopment because we live in a paradise and a lot of folks want in on the action. However the UBC (locally) must be ammended to allow for gray water in certain situations. Currently gray water is 100% banned. There has been a movement for years to water golf courses with "purple water". I live at ECC and they are finally converting.

Reardon wrote on Sep 5, 2007 8:17 PM:At least in theory, the judge was interpreting a law. It is incumbent that local lawmakers change the wording of the law in such a fashion that it cannot be so interpreted. If the Judge is just making it up as he goes along, he can be, and should be overturned.

Waterwatcher wrote on Sep 13, 2007 3:48 PM:You didn't really get into one of the biggest problems we face, the unchecked sprawl development into the hottest areas of the county. As long as local elected officials approve upzones to accomodate big developers and local water agencies continue to promise water services they can't deliver, we're just digging the hole deeper, and existing residents will pay more so that developer can keep getting rich.

Waterwatcher wrote on Sep 13, 2007 3:52 PM:Karl: Haven't you noticed that we're losing our former "paradise" to unsustainable sprawl overdelopment? Have you tried to drive anywhere in your car lately, especially during rush hours? The first thing to do is adopt a moritorium on thirsty new development projects in the hottest parts of the county.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos