A man on a mission: Former Temecula planning director continues to promote merits of mixed-use development
By: BRIAN ECKHOUSE - Staff Writer | ∞
Gary Thornhill's mission has changed little, despite his retirement from Temecula City Hall last December.
He remains the rare crusader of downtown revitalization through "mixed-use" development -- traditionally apartments or condominiums over first-floor shops and restaurants. But in the sprawl of Southern California, Thornhill recognizes there is little room for traditional mixed-use development outside of the downtown corridors of Temecula, his home city, and Murrieta.
"I've always looked at it as a chance to create (a community's) heart," said Thornhill, a longtime Temecula planning director and assistant city manager.
In his new role as a consultant to developers, Thornhill hopes to promote both horizontal and vertical mixed-use projects -- just as he had done for so many years within the chambers of Temecula City Hall. In switching jobs -- but not necessarily objectives -- he began a "new phase" of his life after three decades as a government official, including 17 years in Temecula.
Because Thornhill has earned a comfortable living and pension, he says his primary motivation isn't earning a salary, but promoting sustainable development. He plans to be selective of the projects he chooses -- a luxury not shared by all other area development consultants.
"I'm trying to find people who have the same passion as me," said Thornhill, referring to developers. "But it's hard: There aren't a lot of ... investors who are willing to risk money on something unproven."
In his first project as a development consultant, the 60-year-old Thornhill recently pitched a mixed-use development in northern Murrieta across 53 acres at the northeast corner of Jefferson Avenue and Lemon Street. The pedestrian-friendly "village," dubbed Plaza de Murrieta, would be anchored by dozens of townhouse-style condominiums and featuring an adjoining marketplace and small parks spread throughout.
Sustainability
"People need to think more about sustainability," said Thornhill, referring to the concept of conserving energy and time by grouping residences, shops and jobs together.
But Thornhill -- whose "fingerprint" is all over Temecula, said City Councilman Mike Naggar -- isn't ignorant of the challenge that's been before him for nearly two decades.
"Americans want a single-family home, so it'd take a real change of thinking," he said. "I'm not sure Southern California is ready for it. Maybe Portland and Seattle are ready for it.
"The perception among people in this area is that downtowns are not safe. Unfortunately, in some parts of Southern California, that may not be untrue."
Murrieta City Councilman Rick Gibbs has backed Plaza de Murrieta, which some hope could be a trendsetter to ease the sprawl of Southwest Riverside County. At the very least, the project -- if ultimately approved -- would finally realize a plan among former Murrieta leaders to mix uses on a single parcel, Gibbs said.
"This project is everything that this city was looking for years ago ... and didn't get," Gibbs said. "This is a chance to do it right."
But it's doubtful Plaza de Murrieta's model will become as widespread as past leaders envisioned, in part because most of the city has already been developed. Also, some current Murrieta leaders are reluctant to add more housing units to a city they contend is cluttered with them.
Last week, the Murrieta council approved a broad outline of Plaza de Murrieta's plan, but the finer details of the project still need to be approved.
A new trend?
Murrieta City Manager Ron Bradley, who held that same position in Temecula in the 1990s, said the East Coast is more conducive to clustered villages because of "greater densities and better transportation systems." Bradley was Thornhill's boss when the Murrieta city manager held the same office in Temecula in the mid-1990s.
But Thornhill's preferred developmental model isn't completely unknown in Southwest Riverside County. Two walkable developments in Temecula -- one on Highway 79 South, the other being built on Rancho California Road -- incorporate shops along the thoroughfares with condos away from the roads.
"There's an interesting paradigm shift going on," Naggar said. "People want to work and play as close to home as possible."
That's a stark departure from a national trend that began upon the explosion of suburbia after World War II, particularly in Southern California. The advent of the interstate highway system in the 1950s encouraged Americans to flee dense cities for what was believed -- or hoped -- to be more comfortable lifestyles with more land to roam on.
"People wanted to get away from the density and smog," Naggar said. "But the paradigm shifts appear to have the best of those worlds: People don't mind crowds if there's something to do; and people don't mind crowds if there's no traffic."
Progress in Old Town
Old Town Temecula's newest buildings right off Front Street are three- or four-story buildings mixing residential units with elite restaurants, coffee houses or shops.
"It's been my passion for 17 or 18 years," Thornhill said of downtown development, "and to see it finally become what it could be is wonderful."
But some of the past development along Front Street isn't characteristic of the downtown Thornhill has envisioned.
"The parking lot in front of the performance arts center is not what should be done downtown," he said. "It breaks up the connectivity of the downtown."
Parking lots, he believes, should be situated behind buildings or off the main drag.
Temecula officials apparently have listened, and are planning a large parking structure as part of their future city hall complex just east of Front Street. That project is slated at $44 million.
The promise of a bustling downtown appears higher in Temecula than with its neighbor to the north, however. In Old Town Temecula, new structures mixing classic Western architecture with newer themes are planned or being built along Front Street and adjacent roads.
It may never be as populated as San Diego's Gaslamp Quarter, but each day, the district is increasingly appealing to outsiders. There are more diverse restaurant options, new cafes, and desirable apartment and condominium options -- often situated within the same building.
Challenges in Murrieta
That isn't the case in Murrieta, though Thornhill says it could be.
"It has a historic grid pattern, which is a great opportunity ... for downtown development," he said. "If we want a downtown, we'll have to accept more traffic there, some more intensity, maybe look to height issues."
But longtime Murrieta residents have resisted much development -- especially buildings with more than two stories -- in their downtown district along and around Washington Avenue.
Their concerns have been noted by Murrieta leaders, who hope to find a balance between the "country village" preferred by area residents and a booming business district that generates sales tax revenue for the city.
"It's probably not in the cards for us," Gibbs said of Old Town Temecula's growth spurt. "Each (city) has its own character, and each developed in its own way."
But critics of the status quo say without that type of development, Washington would remain a sleepy drag -- or worse, a blighted district -- depriving Murrieta of a true downtown.
Much of Washington between Ivy and Kalmia streets is comprised of old homes, some offices and small strip malls with parking facing the street.
Many downtown residents are dismayed by the boxy Washington Office Center, a two-story brick building that opened two years ago on Washington just south of Kalmia. But Thornhill believes area residents would be less resistant to structures with multiple stories -- including his preferred apartments or condos over stores and offices -- if architects proposed varying terracing for the different levels of those buildings, which is called "massing."
"I don't know if they can revitalize the area with two- or three-level buildings," Thornhill said.
Creating a village
Four-story buildings with varying "massing" and a mixture of architecture are popping up throughout Old Town Temecula, many of which resemble walk-ups found in Boston and Manhattan. Some feature balconies or awnings, others include colonnades or a combination of brick and panel siding, and most have several entry points and different setbacks among the stories.
Those differing architectural elements within the same structures ensure a lack of uniformity building to building -- a criticized trend of most recent housing tracts in Southern California.
"We don't want homogeny," Thornhill said. "In Italy, maybe it looks cool. But in America ... especially in newer communities, you want to show (they) developed in different periods."
Even with four levels, the new Old Town Temecula structures appear less imposing than the Washington Office Center, or the "big red building" as some angry residents call it.
"They still have a human scale," Thornhill said of the new Temecula buildings.
Despite the promise of Old Town Temecula, there are troubling signs there.
The freeway to the west, Thornhill says, remains a mental barrier for property owners such that restaurants to the east of I-15 are perceived to have a leg up on those downtown. Also, a store across from popular Mexican restaurant Rosa's Cantina on Front Street recently closed down.
"They're still living for the weekend," Thornhill said of Old Town Temecula businesses, as he toured Front Street recently. "You need to get people living here."
-- Contact staff writer Brian Eckhouse at (951) 676-4315, Ext. 2626, or beckhouse@californian.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
YING & YANG wrote on Sep 9, 2007 9:15 PM:A perfect example of why Murrieta is a backward thinking city. Historic Old Town Murrieta will dry up and turn into a slum without the kind of thinking and planning that Temecula has demonstrated in their Old Town. Our Murrieta council members need to stop listening to the very vocal minority and show some leadership. Leaders don't put their fingers in the air to see which way the wind is blowing before they make a decision. Leaders create the wind that fills a city's sails and takes it to new heights. We need some leadership to save Historic Old Town Murrieta. Like the mall, Temecula is ten steps ahead and will attract all the high end restaraunts and businesses, and Murrieta will be left to secure a Dixieline plumbing for Historic Old Town.
NO mixed-use wrote on Sep 9, 2007 9:18 PM:The quickest way to destroy the commercial area of a town is by mixed-use buildings. Interesting that the planning director will be working for developers.
Run this guy out of the state wrote on Sep 10, 2007 12:21 AM:This guy is out to ruin Temecula. Go to another state, just get the he$$ out of here with that mixed use crap! We don't want it here! Crusade something else somewhere else. What kind of business wants the pitter patter of feet above them while they are conducting business? Flushing toilets, noise etc. An old concept that has had its bad times back east. Separate zoning and let us all have some peace. That's what zoning is for, not dump it all together!
Good Planning wrote on Sep 10, 2007 1:14 AM:This guy knows what he's talking about. It's OK to think out of the box and Thornhill's concept has merit. Some small business owner would be thrilled to be at home with family and at work at the same time. Mixed use can be a valuable asset in downtown districts - even in SW County.
To No MIxed use wrote on Sep 10, 2007 6:38 AM:Your backward thinking with the rest of riverside county crawlers are the reason Temecula and other Cities will continue to become slums. Other smarter Cities get it and will improve with mixed use.
Alf wrote on Sep 10, 2007 7:43 AM:While I have little knowledge on the subject, it would seem that one way to have any town, or city, un-earn a nick-name like "Traffecula" is through mixed-use zoning, development and building. The mobility of people and their jobs may make this unrealistic, but the theory is sound, whether it can be applied in the current day is the primary question. Maybe it is an anachronism, but having work and home be close to one another makes sense. Of course, if you really love a 45 or more minute commute and the inherent accidents, if you really love taking 15 minutes to go 3 blocks to get on the freeway, then mixed-use would make no sense to you. One problem with willy-nilly expansion is that effective mass transit is nearly impossible. Oops, I forgot, we are talking So-Cal here, the "I gotta drive my car no matter what, even if it's 3 blocks to the store" part of the country. Regards, Alf.
Murrieta Citizen wrote on Sep 10, 2007 7:52 AM:To Ying and Yang, The peoples voice should not be heard, according to you. This is why we have elections, to elect the best to follow the citizens vision for the city. So many developers have come and jammed "their vision" on cities with no regard to the people. It has been all about the almighty dollar and the he** with the people. Take a look at the traffic problem in SW county. Too many deals have been made without regard for traffic, we'll worry about it later was one Murrieta councilman's lingo. Everyone is forgetting its the peoples vision for their city!
Zygo wrote on Sep 10, 2007 8:47 AM:In Avalon, on Catalina Island, mixed use is a necessity. It works because the only people living above the businesses are either owners or employees. People with ties to the businesses have an interest in keeping the locations kept up. Start stuffing low income housing in the mix and the experiment will eventually fail to the detrement of all.
Murrieta Citizen wrote on Sep 10, 2007 9:05 AM:The peoples voice should not be heard, according to Y&Y. This is why we have elections, to elect the best to follow the citizens vision for the city. So many developers have come and jammed "their vision" on cities with no regard to the people. It has been all about the almighty dollar and the he** with the people. Take a look at the traffic problem in SW county. Too many deals have been made without regard for traffic, we'll worry about infastructure later was one Murrieta councilman's lingo. Everyone is forgetting its the peoples vision for their city!
Concerned-1 wrote on Sep 10, 2007 9:41 AM:Mixed-Use is the model for the future. Look at any population projection for Southern California and envision where people will live. Do you want to continue to sprawl? We'll eventually sprawl into the desert. We need to centralize residential and maintain open space to have a chance at maintaing quality of life. Planners like Thornhill are on the right track.
GO MIXED USE!! wrote on Sep 10, 2007 12:17 PM:Yes, WE REALLY want Mixed Use. Old Town is becoming so cool and we really need to keep it up. I would love to have a flat in Old Town if it continues the growth it has been experiencing so far. It's awesome. GREAT JOB TEMECULA -- Keep it up!! and Hope that passion continues. LOVE OLD TOWN!! It's better than its EVER Been and with mixed uses it will get even better!!!!
Open Minded wrote on Sep 10, 2007 12:41 PM:Mixed-use development refers to the practice of allowing more than one type of use in a building or set of buildings. In planning zone terms, this can mean some combination of residential, commercial, industrial, office, institutional, or other land uses. Geez!! This works for NYC, Philadelphia, London, Singapore, etc. These are a few of the greatest in the world why not Temecula.
Shift happens wrote on Sep 10, 2007 1:36 PM:In my personal opinion, most of you have been confused by the definition of "Old Town", not to be synonymous with " Down Town". If you want an "Old Town", you must preserve the Old and refurbish the essence of just that. A "down town" is yourwhat the San Diego Gaslamp district is and it is miles away from the beautifully preserved "Old town". Which is it people, is Old Town Temecula "Old Town" or "Downtown"? Move the big new buildings to another location suitable for that kind of architecture and refurbish Old Town to the historic, quaint experience it is meant to be.
Which Voice? wrote on Sep 10, 2007 1:45 PM:People like Murrieta Citizen need to decide what they want. First they complain about urban sprawl and all of the problems associated with it, then they fight against the type of development that addresses urban sprawl and all of the problems associated with it. So who are you going to elect? People who have the guts to address the problems or people whose sole concern is being popular enough to get re-elected? Therein lies the one of the problems in addressing the complex issues offered by today's society.
Laughing in San Diego wrote on Sep 10, 2007 3:27 PM:Temeculans ridiculing Murrietans and visa-versa is like a sow calling a hog fat!
Alf wrote on Sep 10, 2007 5:43 PM:Although I laugh somewhat while I live in Encinitas, "Laughing in San Diego", at least I offer suggestions and/ or support, not simply ridicule. If you must have a dig, at least temper it with support for something. Be part of the positive, helpful group. Regards, Alf.
Murrieta Citizen wrote on Sep 10, 2007 6:16 PM:It's called "General Plan". Thats what is put in place hopefully with the citizens input in mind. Most of us buy our homes taking in account what the general plan is for the city and area we are putting stake in.
General Plan wrote on Sep 10, 2007 9:10 PM:A "general plan" is just that. It's general in nature, not specific. If it were specific, it would be called a specific plan. Also, the biggest changes to the "general plan" in Murrieta were instigated by some of those citizens who moved into their homes and then demanded that the general plan be changed. And now, the rest of the city gets to pay for it.
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (19)
- FALLBROOK: Peruvian chocolatier living sweet American dream (12)
- TEMECULA: Parade, fireworks draw thousands on nation's birthday (11)
- CARLSBAD: Golf benefit raises $20,000 for Conner's Cause (9)
- SAN PASQUAL VALLEY: Animal park offering extended hours, extra shows and activities (7)
Advertisement




