Term limit proposal pushes ahead
By: BRIAN ECKHOUSE - Staff Writer | ∞
MURRIETA -- The language of two ballot initiatives proposed by two residents -- including one that would impose term limits on City Council members -- has been changed slightly in an effort to withstand a legal challenge, and signature-gathering could begin in early October, city officials said Monday.
Those initiatives originally were filed in early August, but City Attorney Leslie Devaney advised the proponents that the documents' language could be challenged in court. Devaney strictly assessed language, not intent ---- per the direction of the City Council, said City Councilman Rick Gibbs.
Residents Casey Evans and Bob Kowell, along with Temecula's Rick Reiss, last week resubmitted those two initiatives, including creating term limits for council members. They will be vetted again by Devaney.
In their revised initiative on term limits, a requirement that the ordinance also apply to current council members was removed, per Devaney's suggestion. A retroactive ordinance, she said, could have trouble standing up in court.
The other document, which proposes restricting salaries and benefits to 1.8 times the city's annual median family income, clarifies the maximum earnings of city employees: "The ordinance ... would prohibit City employees, including the City Manager, from having annual salaries with benefits or annual hourly wages including overtime and benefits that exceeds 1.8 times the median family/household income of the City of Murrieta."
That would mean if the median household income were $80,000, the city manager couldn't make more than $144,000 in salary and benefits this year -- about half what interim City Manager Ron Bradley would make if he were to work a full year. Bradley is earning $25,000 monthly, and is contractually ineligible for benefits.
On his current monthly rate, Bradley would earn $300,000 annually without benefits. The ordinance, however, wouldn't affect him, as he has said he plans to retire by Oct. 31.
Devaney said she'd review the two revised initiatives by Oct. 1. From there, the proponents would have about six months to secure signatures for their petitions, in anticipation of being put on the ballot, possibly in mid- to late 2008.
Those initiatives join two others filed by Evans, Kowell and Reiss in August: a new political sign policy and a restriction on the salaries and benefits of the council members. They have through late February to collect signatures for those two initiatives.
If the trio ultimately can secure about 5,800 signatures, or 15 percent of registered Murrieta voters, for each of the four initiatives, the council has two options: Adopt the ordinances within 10 days or order a special election in 88 to 103 days.
If the three are able to collect about 3,850 signatures, or 10 percent of the registered voters, the council has a few options, including adopting the ordinances within 10 days or ordering that it be placed on the ballot of a regular Murrieta election. The next regular city election is scheduled for November 2008.
None of the proponents could be reached for comment Monday. Evans is a bank employee who has run for City Council twice. Kowell and Reiss head up the Murrieta/Temecula Republican Assembly, a local political organization.
-- Contact staff writer Brian Eckhouse at (951) 676-4315, Ext. 2626, or beckhouse@californian.com.
Advertisement
Zygo wrote on Sep 18, 2007 2:30 AM:Term limits - good. Salary cap, including overtime, based on current "average" of city - bad. Using the police department as an example, lets say something catastraphic happens, or several labor intensive events occur and the police are required to work long hours to cover the bases. Do you send everyone home and call in the Sheriff when the overtime hours cause their pay to go up too much? What the temp. city manager is making is a bit awkward, but in reaction to it is the city going to cause itself to be noncompetive and end up with second or third tier employees - i.e. employees that applied elsewhere and couldn't get on? Or new employees that hire on and stay just long enough to get trained for better paying jobs elsewhere?
Murrieta Mom wrote on Sep 18, 2007 5:26 AM:Not a big fan of term limits! People need to stop being so apathetic and VOTE bad people out of office, not let the system do it for them. By the same token, if you get a person in a position that just rocks and is awesome, you have no power to keep them there with term limits. Term limits only foster apathy and ignorance.
sheepel wrote on Sep 18, 2007 8:59 AM:We need term limits until the people come up to speed. Most people haven't been able to keep up with the issues. We have a poor communications medium in the area. We don't want Murrieta to end up like Temecula with the same people running the city year after year. I'd rather lose 1 good person than keep 4 losers. We can always reverse the term limits after the area matures.
Salary caps? wrote on Sep 18, 2007 6:44 PM:What are they THINKING????? If you want a crummy city, vote for this ridiculous idea... Cap out salary at the top at 1.8 median for the TOP official... which means those who who are trickling down the ladder (ie, the ones who really do all the work like the engineers, etc.) are going to end up MAYBE making a median salary? OKay.. well... .vote for this one and you will instantly see what type of city workers you can get. You will certainly will get what you pay for. City workers are overworked and underpaid to start... so slash some more and you will find your city will start to diminish along with the good people currently working there will move on over to work at other Cities..... I would think you would want to pay your City workers well to make sure the City is vibrant... not pay them like crap and hope for the best. I would rather pay them well and get qualified, intelligent worker who care about my city. Pay them not so well, and they will care maybe about 1.8% of the time.
Philip wrote on Sep 19, 2007 2:04 PM:There are lots of good reasons why voters love term limits. Term limits ensure regular, competitive elections; they bring in fresh, real world experience; they sever the cozy relationships with local special interests that make entrenched incumbency possible; they bring the council closer to the people; and they permit greater access for citizen participation in local government. Vote YES
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (10512)
- TEMECULA: Protesters line intersection (6525)
- ESCONDIDO: 3 DUI arrests, 46 impounds at checkpoint (5292)
- ESCONDIDO: Border Patrol employee in custody after hatchet attack (5151)
- ESCONDIDO: City's dreams of an 'upscale' downtown may be dying (4917)
- HOUSING: Local median price up for third straight month (45)
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (44)
- FALLBROOK: Peruvian chocolatier living sweet American dream (29)
- ESCONDIDO: Border Patrol employee in custody after hatchet attack (28)
- ESCONDIDO: Victim's roommate recalls July 4 shooting, friends gather for vigil (27)
Advertisement




