Coastal Commission staff recommends denial of toll road permit
By: MARGA KELLOGG - Staff Writer | ∞
OCEANSIDE ---- The staff of the powerful California Coastal Commission recommended Friday that the panel deny the first of two permits required for a controversial toll road that would cut through a popular surfing spot near San Diego's border with Orange County.
The recommendation, included in a staff report for the Coastal Commission's Oct. 11 meeting, says the toll road proposal violates "numerous resource protection policies of the Coastal Act" and that the project could irreparably harm endangered species in environmentally sensitive areas where the road is planned.
Meanwhile on Friday, the Orange County agency that is hoping to build the $875 million project announced that it would include roughly $100 million in its proposal to pay for preservation of California's parks.
The toll road, which is the final 16.9-mile link in a system of toll roads through Orange County, would enter San Diego County four miles northeast of San Clemente. In San Diego County, the toll road would hug the northern border of San Mateo State Campground, which is part of the 3,000-acre San Onofre State Park, and come within a little more than a football field's length of the closest campsite.
Critics say the freeway link would ultimately destroy the campground and have a negative effect on the Trestles surf break, a popular surfing spot.
Proponents of the toll road say it is needed to relieve traffic congestion on Interstate 5 through Orange County.
The Foothill Transportation Corridor Agency, which would build and manage the road, is made up of three Orange County supervisors and representatives from 12 Orange County cities.
Lisa Telles, a spokeswoman for the transportation agency, said Friday that the agency has always planned to offer park improvements as part of the project, but with the Coastal Commission hearing two weeks away, "we want to make it clear that we're serious about improving the park."
The agency is proposing $70 million be used to pay for an extension of the lease at San Onofre State Park. The lease with the U.S. Department of the Navy expires in 14 years and the current lease arrangement of $1 for 50 years will not be possible under current federal law. Leases on federal property must be negotiated based on fair market value.
Another $20 million would go to pay for construction of new or improved camping facilities at San Onofre State Beach and restoration of historic cottages at Crystal Cove State Park, which is located off Pacific Coast Highway between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach.
And $10 million would pay for restoration of 150 acres of coastal sage scrub habitat in Crystal Cove State park, the agency said.
The offer to help pay for park improvements held little sway Friday with some environmental groups.
Elizabeth Goldstein, president of the California State Park Foundation ---- a statewide organization that serves as an advocate for the state parks system ---- said Friday that rather than offering money, the transportation agency needs to go back to the drawing board and deliver a less damaging alternative for the Coastal Commission's consideration.
"Their project, according to the staff report, is inconsistent legally with the Coastal Zone Management Act," Goldstein said. "You can't buy your way out of inconsistencies with the law."
Stefanie Sekich, who is leading a charge to preserve the Trestles area and is vice chairwoman for the San Diego chapter of the Surfrider Foundation, said she is staying focused on the road proposal and how it would affect the area now.
"It's more important to look at what they're currently trying to do in the park, rather than dangling money and saying it will be preserved," she said.
Telles said the money for the improvements and the lease extension would come with the financing for the project, which will be paid for with bond money.
The agency hopes to get permits for the $875 million project within the next two years and start construction on the toll road in 2011, Telles said.
Contact Staff Writer Marga Kellogg at (760) 901-4067 or mkellogg@nctimes.com.
Advertisement
Cut through Surf Spot? wrote on Sep 29, 2007 10:41 AM:How can a toll road cut through a surf spot? It never comes anywhere near the beach! The San Mateo campground is also no where near the beach. Every time the campground is mentioned, the opponents of this make it seem like the camp ground that it will come "close" too is the camp ground down by the beach, but it isn't. If people would just take a look at the maps and take drive/walk up that way, they'd see that this road will have little or no impact on any of this, especially Trestles, and the REAL objection is based on an anti-development bias in environmental groups i.e. more roads equal more development. The saddest part is this over-reaction to projects like this is what limits greater support for environmental groups because when people see what they are complaining about, it just destroys their credibility. There are way too many REAL environmental issues out there to deal with, but this one just isn't one of them. If the opponents of this project worked half as hard to limit suburban sprawl, the REAL cause of all our environmental problems, but supported improving the flow of existing traffic, I'm willing to bet they'd have a tremendous increase in support. I'd be willing to give up a little bit of open space along this route for a moratorium on new housing east of I-5 in Orange country. Wouldn't that make more sense?
Notoll wrote on Sep 29, 2007 7:43 PM:This project is designed to make a lot of profit for the chosen few...not relieve traffic for the paying masses. Not to mention the 14,000 homes to be built, that will add more traffic..keep it out of San Diego County...
JP wrote on Sep 30, 2007 1:29 PM:Toll roads are a giant scam. They are built with our tax dollars and then they charge us to drive on them, lame!
CC wrote on Oct 1, 2007 10:07 AM:In response to the post from "Cut through Surf Spot?," below: I agree the real problem is suburban sprawl, as you put it; but this tollroad is primarily being pushed through not to relieve traffic but because it will open up more areas for housing development / urban sprawl! The toll road proponents would like you to believe the toll road south extension is about gridlock relief -- as you've suggested. It ISN'T. The toll road will be a development corridor, paving the way, literally, for major development in and around the San Mateo Crk drainage, the last undeveloped watershed in SoCal and some of the only pure coatal wetlands left in SoCal. While development is the primary interest driving the toll road, of course the TCA doesn't want to couch the issue in such reality-based terms because they know it would kill the project. This road will NOT relieve traffic congestion, as some of the TCA's OWN research shows. They have simply postured the issue this way in order to help push through their development corridor agenda. Don't be fooled. And it must be remembered that San Onofre State Park -- which this freeway would disect and impede -- was initially created as mitigation for the San O nuclear generating station put in decades ago. Is NOTHING sacred?-
Sue wrote on Nov 2, 2007 1:09 PM:The last thing we need is more beautiful, pirstine, natural California going to greedy developers and politicians. Bravo to the commission staff for rejecting the tollroad expansion.
Deborah wrote on Dec 31, 2007 2:17 PM:As a resident of the Inland Empire, the CA 241 Toll Road completion connecting the existing road to the I-5 in San Clemente would greatly improve my commute to the San Diego area. Currently, the only, somewhat direct, route available to me is the I-15 south to the Highway 79 west. Although this does place me near Oceanside, I have family in the Dana Point.San Clemente area, and am forced to drive north on I-5. If the CA 241 toll road is completed, I would be able to arrive at my destination more easily.
Furthermore, by opening the CA 241 toll road to San Clemente, much of the traffic currently on the I-5 between Irvine (where the 5 and 405 join) and San Clemente would be diminished.
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, email addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
- REAL ESTATE: SoCal bloggers fight housing 'bailout' (2944)
- REGION: Just two police departments say they will offer a grace period on cell phone law (2446)
- ESCONDIDO: Police investigating Escondido teen's homicide (2381)
- ESCONDIDO: Teen slaying fits gang profile (2295)
- ESCONDIDO: Police: Freeway stop nets suspect in fatal shooting (2275)
Advertisement

