Airport improvements open for public comment
By: GIG CONAUGHTON - Staff Writer
Lindbergh could add gates, parking, curb space | ∞
San Diego International Airport's Terminal 2 drop off and pick up area.
JAMIE SCOTT LYTLE Staff Photographer
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery
SAN DIEGO -- Airport authority officials released an environmental study for the second time Monday on $650 million worth of proposed Lindbergh Field improvements, including 10 new airline gates and more space to pick up and drop off passengers.
San Diego County Regional Airport Authority officials said the improvements included in their master plan probably would not be built until 2012 and would ease traffic for a few years.
The authority says Lindbergh, the county's only regional commercial airport, badly needs the improvements to handle increased traffic.
Lindbergh handled 17.5 million passengers this year, but the authority expects that number to climb to 22 million by 2015 and 27 million by 2030.
Keith Wilschetz, the authority's director of airport planning, said the new airline gates were key to the short-term improvements.
"The primary feature is, we need to add 10 new gates at Lindbergh, and we plan to do it at terminal two," he said.
Wilschetz said the new improvements would probably provide only temporary relief -- through 2015 -- and that new plans, including the possible construction of another airport runway, would need to be considered in the future.
"With these new gates, we'll have 51 total," Wilschetz said. "Our best analysis is that the runway can sustain about 60 gates. At some point we will probably look to build additional gates. (But) once we reach that point, it wouldn't make a lot of sense to add more gates because the runway will simply be at its maximum."
But he also said that the authority did not have the luxury of waiting and trying to come up with a long-term fix because the airport was already overcrowded and needed immediate help. Wilschetz said the airport already needed 43 gates and only had 41, and that the strain would only grow.
"Given the fact we're already behind we want to get these gates in place," he said. "And in 2015, then, certainly, it will be time to look at something else."
Wilschetz said the other key short-term improvements that could be built once the environmental study was certified included:
n A two-level roadway and curbside at the expanded second terminal that would allow more people to pick up and drop off passengers while simultaneously reducing the current crowded conditions. Wilschetz said the roadway would be similar to those seen at Los Angeles International and other major airports.
n New, safer aircraft parking and overnight aircraft parking on the current airfield so that airplanes would not have to cross over Lindbergh's single runway to get to the existing parking spaces.
n New hangars and facilities for private aircraft.
The airport authority, which was created five years ago primarily to locate a new site for a regional airport, came under heavy fire in 2006 when voters overwhelmingly rejected the authority's choice of Miramar Marine Corps Air Station. Since then, the authority has said its goal was to make Lindbergh "the very best it can be."
Wilschetz said the authority plans to begin work on a plan to address Lindbergh's long-term questions in the fall.
Wilschetz said the current master plan studied in the environmental document included two separate types of plans. The first were short-term improvements such as new airline gates. The second piece of the report revolved around longer-term projects that would need further study at the 661-acre airport -- including a possible transit center where people could come to the airport by bus and even rail.
Wilschetz said the agency hoped to hold public hearings and gather comments on the environmental study until Nov. 30, and to issue a final plan for authority board members to approve in March or April.
Authority spokeswoman Diana Lucero said the authority planned to hold seven, eight-hour hearings for the public to comment, including one from noon to 8 p.m. Oct. 23 at Carlsbad's Harding Community Center.
Meanwhile, airport planner Ted Anasis said the environmental study reported that the Lindbergh improvements would create traffic problems in the areas around Lindbergh that could be eased by building new lanes and turn lanes. However, Anasis said, the steadily-increasing traffic would eventually create air pollution problems that could not be eased.
Monday marked the second go-round for the environmental study.
Agency managers released a draft plan in May 2006. But the authority's board asked that it be redone with two major changes. First, the board wanted an alternative that did not include a proposed four-story parking garage.
Second, the board asked that managers include a possible transit center in the long-range portion of the plan.
People interested in seeing a copy of, or commenting on, the environmental study, or to get more information, can go to www.sanplan.com.
-- Contact staff writer Gig Conaughton at (760) 739-6696 or gconaughton@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Matt wrote on Oct 8, 2007 11:09 PM:I think the airport needs to have both, a second runway and new gates. I am surprised they can continue normal operations with just the one runway. The Regional airport commision should sit down and come up with a plan to get the necessary funding. It can be done, just think sensibly.-
Well, wrote on Oct 9, 2007 6:43 AM:It needs to be expanded. But, I don't know how much more that piece of land can take. Needs to move to Brown field or Miramar. I vote for Miramar but it looks like we need it to bomb Iran pretty soon. Sad.-
Miramar not Lindbergh wrote on Oct 9, 2007 9:38 AM:Hopefully, someday when we are done bombing other countries, Miramar becomes an option for a regional airport. While it is great to have all the military in the San Diego region, the area is running out of land for basic infrastructure like an airport. This issue has been studied to death and now the politicians use more studies just to stall the final decision. A choice will have to be made. Improvements need to be made at Lindbergh but Miramar is the answer. For those people that bought houses in a Miramar flight path, you knew the possibility of air noise when you bought your property.
How about wrote on Oct 9, 2007 10:39 AM:operating it 24 hours a day? and get rid of people having to cross roadways holding up shuttles. More gates won't help unless you can land and take off more planes which longer hours and another runway would provide. Better yet, move it to Miramar.
Tracy wrote on Oct 9, 2007 11:25 AM:What gives everyone the idea that Miramar is up for grabs? Keep dreaming! The Department of Defense is never going to turn over one square foot of Miramar. They're not in the the business of Base Realignments And Closures any more and Miramar picked up the capacity from El Toro MCAS when it closed.
guru53 wrote on Oct 9, 2007 7:48 PM:Put in an extra lane in the front. Knock out some of the first-line parking for a second lane.
Reality Check wrote on Oct 16, 2007 4:42 PM:Tracy...The military put up Miramar in 1994 only to have it "re-aligned" compliments of Duke Cunningham. No more BRAC? Try 2013 and 2020. All others, you're right. Miramar is not Lindbergh. Plenty of space between the airport and homes, plenty of room for a runway that can support international flights. Especially with aircraft like the 787. The 24 hour operation isn't going to happen at Lindbergh, wouldn't need it if you had two runways either. It was a settlement from a lawsuit thanks to the geniuses in Loma Portal who moved there long after the airport was open. Lindbergh is done. Put a fork in it and build a real airport at Miramar and quit dinkering around. Use Lindbergh for corporate jets and Southwest.
I love airplanes wrote on Feb 5, 2008 6:14 PM:I heard that a long time ago (not sure when), the military offered the land that MCAS Miramar is currently on to the City of San Diego for $1 to build a commercial airport. The city refused because at the time, Miramar was considered "too far" from downtown. I bet San Diego wished they took that offer now.
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement



