Vista Irrigation District considering tighter water-use restrictions
By: CRAIG TENBROECK - Staff Writer | ∞
VISTA -- While the county's main water wholesaler is hoping voluntary conservation and other measures can get the region through a looming water crisis, at least one local agency is considering taking a harder line.
In the next few weeks, perhaps as soon as Wednesday, the Vista Irrigation District's board will discuss whether it's appropriate to declare a Stage Two water alert -- something the agency hasn't done since the early 1990s, officials said.
For Vista, a Stage Two alert means, among other things, that residents can't water lawns for more than 10 minutes per day, restaurants can't serve water unless asked and customers have less time to repair leaks. Other water agencies define Stage Two alerts in different ways.
The Vista district would be the second water agency in the county to enact tighter restrictions in recent months. In September, the Fallbrook Public Utility District stepped up conservation rules for its customers.
The water wholesaler, the San Diego County Water Authority, and its supplier, the Metropolitan Water District, haven't imposed mandatory restrictions, aside from agricultural cuts. The water authority is estimating it can meet the county's water needs at least through 2008.
However, officials said, that could change if people don't take conservation seriously.
"We're not recommending mandatory cutbacks or mandatory conservation right now," said Ken Weisberg, water resources manager for the water authority.
"But that doesn't alleviate the need to conserve water," he added. "Because if we can't do it voluntarily, we're going to have to do it on a mandatory basis."
If that happens, the Vista Irrigation District doesn't want to be caught off guard, board member Paul Dorey said.
"There are not any good signs," Dorey said. "We're just getting prepared."
Years of drought, along with a recent federal court decision, have raised the specter of possible water cuts in San Diego. Regional officials have suggested that Southern California could see a 30 percent cut of its water from the north due to the court ruling, which was intended to protect an endangered fish.
"I think it's a serious situation," said Roy Coox, the Vista Irrigation District's assistant general manager.
In September, the Fallbrook Public Utility District became the first local water agency to declare a Stage Two alert. However, Fallbrook's Stage Two is roughly equivalent to the Vista Irrigation District's Stage One alert, according to a Vista district report.
A spokeswoman for the Fallbrook district said their Stage Two recommendations aren't extreme.
"It's basically just common-sense restrictions," said the spokeswoman, Noelle Denke. "We're not putting out the water cops. We're asking people to do ... voluntary things that they really should be doing all the time."
When the agency has received complaints about violations, it has been able to correct them simply by meeting with the customers, she said.
By bumping its alert level, the Vista Irrigation District -- which provides water to the city of Vista and portions of San Marcos, Escondido, Oceanside and unincorporated areas of the county -- would be acknowledging the "probability" it won't be able to meet customer demand, a district report says.
Under its Stage Two alert, the goal is to slice water use by 10 percent. The alert lists several restrictions, including prohibiting hotels and motels from changing linens for multiple-day customers daily unless requested.
District staff members wouldn't be hunting for violations, but if they're notified of repeat offenders, citations could be issued, said Brett Hodgekiss, an administrative manager with the Irrigation District.
At the moment, however, it's unclear whether the Vista Irrigation District board is ready to move to Stage Two.
"We want to be proactive. ... But there's another school of thought that we don't want to lose our credibility by crying wolf," Coox said. "I think the board recognizes there are two schools of thought, and I 'm not sure if a majority of the board is leaning one way or the other."
Board president Howard Williams said Monday that he doesn't expect the Irrigation District to raise the alert level immediately.
"There's no need to stampede on this," Williams said. "We don't know what the rainy season's going to bring yet."
The Irrigation District board is slated to discuss its "water shortage options" at 8:30 a.m. Wednesday at district headquarters, 1391 Engineer Street. But the item is likely to be postponed due to a "procedural glitch" in the way it was placed on the agenda, Coox said.
-- Contact staff writer Craig TenBroeck at (760) 901-4062 or ctenbroeck@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
RAZOR ONE wrote on Nov 20, 2007 12:04 AM:IF NEW HOUSES AND BUILDING WERE NOT BEING BUILT WE WOULD NOT HAVE A WATER PROBLEM. WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO REALIZE THIS IS THE UPPER DESERT. YOU HAVE OVER DEVELOPED THIS AREA. JUST LIKE YOU HAVE INFLATED THE WATER RATES YOU HAVE MORE HOUSE'S MORE INDUSTIRAL BUILDING AND SO, WATER RATES SHOULD BE LOWER. YOU JUST SIT THERE THE dIRECTORS AND MAKE MORE MONEY THEN YOU DESERVE FOR THE WORK THAT YOU DO...
No new hook-ups wrote on Nov 20, 2007 6:35 AM:How can the water districts call for water conseevation while they are still in the practice of granting thousands of new meters for NEW water use. No one should be forced to restrict their use unless the water districts cease their wanton sale of new hook-ups.
anotherview wrote on Nov 20, 2007 8:55 AM:Statewide, farmers overuse and waste water. Farming activity now consumes about 80 percent of the available state water supply. Households use about 5 percent. The rest goes to government, industrial, and commercial. Simple math shows that forcing farmers statewide to lower their water use by only 6.25 percent would equal the same amount of water as households use. Further, about 30 percent of farm irrigation water goes to waste in runoff from the land. Via political pressure, farmers resist (1) improving their farm irrigation practices and (2) recycling farm water runoff. The Golden State has plenty of water available, but the distribution and use of this water does not happen rationally. Farmers grab most of the water, and then waste nearly a third of it. So any fair and sound solution to the water supply problem must require farmers statewide to stop using and wasting so much water. Then others will have enough water.
anon wrote on Nov 20, 2007 9:00 AM:people that get the new meter should be the ones paying for more water. those that have lived here all there life should not be forced to kill there trees or cut them down ,or move out of state for a new meter.
Inquiring Minds wrote on Nov 20, 2007 10:12 AM:So, does watering your lawn for no more than 10 minutes mean at each station or the entire cycle for the entire lawn cannot be more than 10 minutes. Those of us with automatic sprinkler systems need clarification.
Those of You with Auto Sprinklers wrote on Nov 20, 2007 11:15 AM:need to get a clue. It means 10 minutes for the entire lawn. That's it. We don't need lawns. We need water for our food to be grown. More gallons of water are wasted by auto sprinkler systems that are set to go on for so long or so misdirected that hundreds of gallons of water run into the streets to such an extent that many are coated with green slime from the overwatering. Plant native CA species and xeriscapes. Lawns are a luxury we can ill afford.
Theotis wrote on Nov 20, 2007 3:46 PM:Just who do these chumps think they are? I think I'll drain my pool and refill over the weekend.
TedHead wrote on Nov 20, 2007 4:48 PM:Cool, Theotis! I'll change the water in my jacuzzi!!
How many new services x water use wrote on Nov 20, 2007 5:59 PM:How can a Water District think that they can insist on Stage 2 water restrictions while they are still to this very day issuing new water meters. Let's do a little research. Somebody needs to check exctly how many new water services are being planned for each and every water district. Then we need to figure out how much water each and every one of them use. Take that figure, pro-rate it and consider that the savings that each existing customer has made. We will find that there is no need for the existing customers to conserve, but the need is to eliminate any new ones. It will be unfair to existing customers ! Go to the Water District meetings !
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement