Hospitals pinch to avoid bankruptcy

By: CHRIS BAGLEY - Staff Writer
District lays off 41 employees and moves to cancel contracts; cuts in service loom | Tuesday, November 20, 2007 11:29 PM PST

Menifee Valley Medical Center and two other hospitals in the region will trim their staffs and attempt to renegotiate contracts in an effort to stem financial losses that threaten to put them into bankruptcy, the hospitals' new managers said Tuesday.

Valley Health System, the public health-care district that owns the hospitals, plans to lay off 41 of its 2,000 employees, including about 10 people at Menifee Valley on McCall Boulevard in Sun City, chief executive Fred Harder said.

The district cancelled its contract with the previous management company, run by Hemet surgeon Kali Chaudhuri, and hired Quorum Health Group Inc., Harder's employer, shortly before a watershed vote Nov. 7.

Voters in central Riverside County rejected Measure G, which would have approved the sale of the hospitals to a consortium of private investors. Opponents of the measure, who were concentrated in Hemet and San Jacinto, argued that the sale would keep the hospitals stuck in a web of contracts that were responsible for the continued red ink. Directors of the district's board said it has been bleeding about $1 million per week.

Harder said in an interview Tuesday that he doesn't foresee cutting services at the Sun City hospital, though a press release from the district stated it would "begin seriously evaluating the closure of underutilized services" at one or more of its facilities.

"Then, there's the renegotiation of other contracts wherever we might have them," Harder said, declining to go into specifics.

The press release from the district mentioned unspecified managed care contracts.

The leader of the opposition to Measure G had singled out a doctors' group run by Chaudhuri. The opponent, Hemet general practitioner Neal Simpson, alleged that Chaudhuri used his control of the management company to steer sweetheart contracts to his own medical practice and drive the district to the brink of bankruptcy.

The district might have begun closing hospitals as soon as January, Board Chairman Patrick Searl said in the press release.

"The voters have spoken," Searl said in the statement. "This means we need to take immediate, strong action to stave off financial peril for the entire system. Our choice is clear."

Searl didn't return a call seeking comment Tuesday afternoon.

Measure G failed by a vote of 18,500 to 16,200, the board's second defeat in a year. Voters favored a $485 million bond last year by 56 percent to 44 percent, but it fell short of the two-thirds supermajority necessary for it to pass.

-- Contact staff writer Chris Bagley at (951) 676-4315, Ext. 2615, or cbagley@californian.com.

Next Previous
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Ignorance! wrote on Nov 21, 2007 9:20 AM:The voters were ingnorant not to approve the sale of these hospitals! Those voters will cause many people to lose their jobs and the hospital may end up in bankruptcy and we may end up with NO hospital here!! Do they really think that is a positive thing? We had private investors willing to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to turn around our hospitals and yet you all voted it down???!!!! How lame can you be? Thanks for such an ignorant vote; now we can expect layoffs (less staff at an understaffed hospital), then bankruptcy to reorganize the hospital to provide LESS services to already dwindled support. That is if the doors can even be kept open. All Thanks to the einstein efforts to defeat the sale to investors who would have bought it for tons of money and provided more and better services. Not too smart voters;--- not too smart

Dave wrote on Nov 21, 2007 3:21 PM:Does anyone know why this area can't seem to get a real hospital? The medical care available to me when in lived in San Diego was 10x better than what is available in Riverside County. Why?

Smart Voter wrote on Nov 21, 2007 3:54 PM:The sales contract for the three hospitals were problematic from the beginning. It was an out right gift of public funds and rsources to a special interest group who were not totally from within the hospital district. The taxpayers would have been left with the bill to underwrite a bad policy negotated by special interests on the Hospital Board. It was not the igorant voters who are causing the lose of jobs but the elected Board of the Hospital District that have made bad decisions on behalf of the people of the District. Thankfully our system of government rules by majority, and it was this majority that has said, enough is enough, get your management skills together and start working for the benefit of the people that put them in office and not for the special interest groups in the medical profession. In my perspective it is the smart voters who saw the sweetheart sales deal to the special interest and gave a NO to the deal. In my book that is a SMART voter not an ignorant one.

Unemployed wrote on Nov 25, 2007 12:25 AM:YOU are the ignorant one. You listened to a bunch of slander and propaganda. Having the hospital go into bankruptcy is a MUCH better idea. Lay off all the workers. Sure, what do you care? You aren't affected. I'll be sure to send you warm thoughts from the unemployment line. I'm sure all the other people who have been laid off..and there are many many more to come thank you too.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos