Perris wants to halt Menifee Valley cityhood

By: SELICIA KENNEDY-ROSS - Staff Writer
City officials concerned about part of Romoland becoming incorporated | Monday, November 26, 2007 11:18 PM PST

PERRIS -- Perris city leaders are so unhappy about a future election on Menifee Valley cityhood that they have authorized a lawsuit seeking to block the vote.

The City Council voted 4-0 last week, with Councilman John Mott abstaining, to file the suit against the county and the Local Agency Formation Commission, which in October approved the plan for incorporating Menifee, Sun City, Quail Valley and part of Romoland.

The commission's action means voters in that area could decide the issue in June, once the county Board of Supervisors rubber-stamps an election on the measure as expected in the coming weeks.

If more than 50 percent of Menifee Valley voters favor incorporation, the area will become a 48-square-mile city with more than 60,000 people on Oct. 1, 2008.

Perris Mayor Daryl Busch said Monday his city's lawsuit will "challenge some of the conditions LAFCO approved."

"We don't feel they meet the requirements we would like," Busch said. "The city manager and city attorney appeared at the (October) meeting and presented our objections. We expressed concern that we thought the city of Perris could better serve those areas and asked (that) they not be included in Menifee's city limits. LAFCO chose to do otherwise."

Busch said the "primary reason for challenging the incorporation is that whatever happens there has a great effect on the city of Perris and their development interests wouldn't be the same as ours, especially with regards to developer fees and public safety issues."

Perris officials are specifically upset that the new city would include 35 acres in Romoland south of Matthews Road and east of Trumble Road that are in Perris' sphere of influence and therefore identified as appropriate for annexation into that city. The contested 35 acres is host to a shopping center development that would generate sales tax revenues for the jurisdiction that controls that land.

"They might pursue a major development and not have the same interests that we would or undertake the responsibilities that we think they should in terms of traffic and the highway," Busch said. "They may not feel as strongly as we do in their development."

Joe Daugherty, chairman of the pro-cityhood Menifee Valley Incorporation Committee, said he doesn't understand why Perris waited so long to take action against the incorporation efforts or why the city hasn't already annexed the 35 acres.

"I didn't expect it," Daugherty said of Perris' legal challenge. "I don't understand it at all. I don't understand where they are coming from.

"They seem to want to fight over Romoland, but that's really up to the people of Romoland. So far, everyone seems to be in favor of joining Menifee."

At LAFCO's Oct. 25 meeting when the incorporation plan was approved, a letter hand-delivered by Perris' city attorney and city manager expressed the city's concerns.

"Literally at the last minute, they threatened legal action," Daugherty said. "LAFCO approved us anyway, and now Perris wants to sue. I can't say I'm surprised. They voiced their concerns at LAFCO but they had a 45-day draft period ---- and at the 11th hour they start this kind of thing? It's silly."

Daugherty said he was not sure if Perris could successfully stall Menifee's incorporation effort, which was launched about 10 years ago.

George Spiliotis, executive officer of the formation commission, was out of the office and could not be reached for comment Monday. In an earlier interview, Spiliotis said the commission asked Perris city leaders for input about the city's future growth and the city's borders two years ago, but the commissioners received no reply.

Joe Rank, who serves as both county counsel and the attorney for the commission, said Monday it would be premature to comment on a lawsuit that has not yet been filed.

"We haven't been served with the lawsuit yet. I can't even tell you what they will allege so I can't tell you how it will impact us, or what they will try to accomplish by the suit," Rank said.

-- Contact Selicia Kennedy-Ross at (951) 676-4315, Ext. 2626, or e-mail skennedy-ross@californian.com.

Next Previous

Advertisement

12 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

city ace wrote on Nov 27, 2007 6:18 AM:How can the city of Perris officials know what they want or don't want? They have had seven or eight or more city managers in the past six years than any other city in the valley. They have council members up on drug charges, members charged with illegal campaine funds and who knows what they have done behind closed doors.. Take a drive through the city you tell me they haven't done anything for the people of Perris and Menifee REALLY DOESN"T WANT them in our city.. Talk about having BAD NEIGHORBS... stay away

Zygo wrote on Nov 27, 2007 6:32 AM:A political sphere of influence is an unincorporated area that is slated for future incorporation into a city. The city identifies the area, requests the area and it is placed by LAFCO for future incorporation by the city. Why didn't Perris follow this procedure? I can understand why the people of Romoland would rather be with Menifee, Perris has a very poor reputation and this just reinforces it.

Team Menifee wrote on Nov 27, 2007 7:37 AM:The City Perris should concentrate on improving the area that they already have.....they can't handle any more land- they will destroy it!!!! Hopefully LAFCO will ignore Perris and grant Menifee cityhood.

Menifee_Resident wrote on Nov 27, 2007 8:26 AM:Here come the revenge of the ghetto

RivcoRes wrote on Nov 27, 2007 8:53 AM:Leave it to the voters. Perris is no paradise. The City snoozed and sat on thier butts while the wheels of progress passed them by. This is nothing but a prime example of a Power Grab. The County will do what is best for it's citizens, not it's politicians.

RivcoRes wrote on Nov 27, 2007 8:54 AM:Leave it to the voters. Perris is no paradise. The City snoozed and sat on thier butts while the wheels of progress passed them by. This is nothing but a prime example of a Power Grab. The County will do what is best for it's citizens, not it's politicians.

Council wrote on Nov 27, 2007 9:45 AM:The area in dispute may be in Perris' sphere of influence but, everybody except the council would agree that area would be better served by Menifee. Perris will always be a pit for crime. That's their reputation. That shopping center won't stand on it's own if it is in the city of Perris but, will thrive under Menifee.

stew wrote on Nov 27, 2007 9:53 AM:Nothing unusual for this city, they held up the Menifee Unified School District petition drive as well. The Menifee cityhood and MUSD projects will soon become reality, local representation at last. Let our citizens vote on both of these projects... now.

qvresnt wrote on Nov 27, 2007 11:51 AM:I can't wait for menifee to take over quail valley we need help; sewer system project on hold no-one pays attention to our needs.

I live here wrote on Nov 27, 2007 1:45 PM:I live in the area under debate here. Why did Perris take so long to dispute the area of incorporation? I'll tell you why, because they have their heads in the sand and can't handle what they have on their plates to begin with. I agree with RivRes at 8:54, the City sat on their collective butts! ATTENTION LAFCO: LEAVE IT UP TO THE VOTERS! GO MENIFEE!

matt wrote on Nov 27, 2007 10:29 PM:how does it affect perris if menifee becomes a city? get a life and worry about your own city perris is garbage anyways i dont think they should even be a city

perris resident wrote on Jan 27, 2008 1:21 PM:Perris is not capable of running what they have now. They don't maintain anything that they have now...where do their the tax $'s go. LAFCO please listen to the voters. I wish we could find a way to de-annex from the City of Perris. Perris....can you tell us one positive thing you have done for this city???

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos