Beach sand project forges ahead

By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer
Communities, surfers brace for high surf along North County coast | Tuesday, December 4, 2007 8:28 PM PST

As North County braces for predicted 15-foot waves associated with a powerful approaching Pacific storm, a regional panel is set this week to try to move the dream of another sand-replenishment project a little closer to reality.

The San Diego Association of Governments, a regional planning agency, is hoping to launch a countywide effort similar to the one in 2001 that placed 2 million cubic yards of sand on a dozen San Diego-area beaches, most of them in North County. That $17.5 million project dredged up enough sand from the ocean bottom to fill Qualcomm Stadium, but by now most of the sand has washed out to sea.

The association has set 2010 as the target date for the followup project.

But the price tag is expected to be considerably higher this time around, or more than $22 million. That's the amount the agency sought from the state in August, but officials say they realize the region may receive significantly less.

The association's Shoreline Preservation Working Group is scheduled to meet at 11:30 a.m. Thursday at 401 B St., Suite 800, in downtown San Diego, to discuss options for local funding and a new cost-benefit analysis that quantifies the project's potential impact on the economy.

Meanwhile, area cities were making preparations Tuesday for the approaching storm, which threatens to flood low-lying beachfront streets and erode bluffs that support seaside homes. At the same time, crowds of surfers were beginning to swell in anticipation of the waves that were reaching a half dozen feet and growing.

"We're shoring up some sand in front of our Powerhouse Park, as well as in front of our lifeguard tower," said Pat Vergne, lifeguard chief for Del Mar. "Those are the two areas where we don't have sea-wall protection."

Larry Giles, Encinitas' marine safety captain, said his city last month built a sand berm at Moonlight Beach that is about 10 feet high. It is something the city does every year about this time.

"We berm across the entire cove there from the volleyball court over to the lifeguard headquarters," Giles said.

City lifeguards pulled all of the portable fiberglass lifeguard towers off of the city's low-lying beaches so they won't get hammered by the heavy winter surf.

This week's heavy surf, meanwhile, is expected to lure a large numbers of surfers to the North County shore, Giles said. And he said the city will be ready in case there are any accidents; rescuers are preparing to deploy a pair of watercraft at Moonlight Beach.

The North County shore was among the biggest recipients of the 2001 sand replenishment undertaking. Sand was used to beef up the thin shoreline at 12 beaches: Oceanside, north Carlsbad, south Carlsbad, Batiquitos, Leucadia, Moonlight, Cardiff, Fletcher Cove, Del Mar, Torrey Pines, Mission and Imperial.

According to a report, the shoreline committee will consider Thursday, the $22 million sequel would deliver $34 million in benefits for the region, by way of an economic boost from more beach visitors to improved protection from winter storm damage.

The report analyzes three project alternatives. One would increase the overall amount of sand by 50 percent; one would spread the same amount of sand used in 2001, but among fewer beaches; another would use the same amount of sand in generally the same areas, but shift the receiving points in three cases.

In the latter option, Oceanside would get sand next to the pier instead of in the southern part of the city. And because the pier is more popular with beachgoers, the benefits would be greater there, according to the report by Phil King, an economics professor at San Francisco State University.

Even so, said Steve Aceti, executive director of the California Coastal Coalition lobbying group, the panel probably will pursue a project similar to the 2001 effort, which sought to stock the region with sandier beaches several summers in a row.

"It's an example of an 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it' kind of thing," Aceti said.

While the Oceanside Pier alternative was not anticipated to cost more, it might well make the project more complex because a new spot would require extensive studies to analyze the potential environmental impacts, he said. The advantage of going to the same places, he said, is that the impacts are already known.

-- Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 745-6611, Ext. 2623, or ddowney@nctimes.com. Comment at nctimes.com.

Next Previous

Advertisement

11 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

Sand Dollars wrote on Dec 4, 2007 10:17 PM:What happen to the Council Member Sanchez's plan to have the inland cities in San Deigo County pay for the sand needed on the beach? I think this was a swell idea.

billy: wrote on Dec 5, 2007 7:35 AM: Did you feel that? It wasn't an earthquake. It was the old SANDAG nudge on our wallets here again in the past week. Why do I have to contribute to sand replenishment when I live inland and never go to the beaches. We should let nature take its course and if the sand is washed out to sea, so be it.

Sand Tax? wrote on Dec 5, 2007 10:03 AM:One of the reasons there is such little sand at the beach is because our rivers are dammed up to provide water. Tax water usage. Furthermore tax transient occupancy, ie: hotels and timeshares because they come here for the beach. Why does Florida and New Jersey get so much money for sand replenishment for their beaches from the Fed's. Where are our congressmen. Ooops forgot Duke was on the dole and the last thing he cared about was his constituents. Since California pays more in Federal taxes than we get back we should be getting some of the beach replenishment money just like Florida and New Jersey!!!

Meyer wrote on Dec 5, 2007 10:08 AM:Gee, Billy, why should the coasties pay for the inland roads? They don't drive on them!

Billy wrote on Dec 5, 2007 10:55 AM: Attn: Sand Tax: The reason there is no sand on the beaches on the West Coast is because the moon and the tides pull the sand away from the beaches. On the East Coast it is the exact opposite - the moon and tides bring the sand in and deposit it on the beaches. That is the reason the East Coast of our country has such beautiful beaches compared to ours here on this coast. There is a difference in sand and waste, debree, and silt that a freshwater stream will wash out to sea.

Billy wrote on Dec 5, 2007 11:00 AM: Attn. Meyer: We pay our share of the cost of the highways. If you on the coast were paying the full cost for highways and we were paying nothing, then you might have a valid argument.

Sand Dollar Sanchez; wrote on Dec 5, 2007 12:32 PM:It was a facetious statement; Sanchez's idea to have the inland communities pay for sand is ridiculous. It is just after 7 years of doing nothing as a Council Member; Sanchez decided to take up the cause of sand replenishment. Well she better hurry up, after todays wave action there is going to be very little sand left in Oceanside south of the pier.

Yep, forge. wrote on Dec 5, 2007 3:18 PM:Ahead. Forge ahead. We can defeat Mother Nature with LOTS of sand and $$$$$. Go for it.

WKMeyer wrote on Dec 5, 2007 3:51 PM:Exactly... neither is a valid argument.

WKMeyer wrote on Dec 5, 2007 4:30 PM:To Billy: Sand movement and subsequent loss is due to the winter storms and associated wave action as well as the longshore currents. Much of the sand is lost into the offshore La Jolla Canyon and, as Sand Tax correctly stated, the "natural" sources of replenishment have been disrupted by development. We all hate to pay for something that we feel doesn't benefit us individually but this really is a common good issue. San Diego thrives on tourism and the beach is one of its big draws. Sorry for the soapbox rant...

Watcher wrote on Dec 5, 2007 7:52 PM:Sand Tax is correct. Wonder how much sand washed off our beaches today? SANDAG has discovered a perpetual tax expenditure machine. They tax us, dig up sand from offshore and put it on the beaches; it washes off, then they tax us again to replace it again, and it washes off again. It may be time to dump SANDAG if this is what it spends all its time and all our money on.

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos