"We do not fund shelters," John Weil told North County Times reporter Craig TenBroeck. 12-21-2007" />

Homeless don't make the cut

By: RICHARD RIEHL - for the North County Times | Thursday, December 20, 2007 9:04 PM PST

Ebenezer Scrooge's excuse for stiffing the poor can be heard in the words of county Supervisor Pam Slater-Price's chief of staff, as he explained why his boss wouldn't use money from her $2 million annual Community Projects fund ---- a pot of money given to each of the five county supervisors to use at their discretion ---- to support the North County Homeless Shelter Network. "We do not fund shelters," John Weil told North County Times reporter Craig TenBroeck.

If that's true, why does Slater-Price's Web site list her $1.65 million funding of a new animal shelter in North County as one of her top accomplishments ? She and Bill Horn couldn't scrape together $45,000, about 1 percent of their combined budgets, to shelter homeless humans.

Horn's spokesman, John Culea, claims the grants "usually involve one-time capital improvements." I guess that depends on his definition of "usually." Projects funded by his boss this year include a majority of exceptions to that rule.

Weil and Culea's deceptive answers reveal why it's time for county supervisors to come clean about their slush funds.

Despite recommendations by a 2004 grand jury that the program be more openly publicized and documented, supervisors bury recipient names and grant amounts in the minutes of Board of Supervisors' meetings. Go to the county clerk's Web site , scroll through each meeting agenda, and look for actions taken under the item, "Finance and General Government."

A sample of this year's projects offers no insight into why homeless shelters shouldn't be included.

Bill Horn's largest grant went to a project far beyond North County: $150,000 for the design and construction of a new theater in Balboa Park. He gave a total of $169,000 in grants, ranging from $10,000 to $50,000, to seven nonprofit organizations for expenses unrelated to capital improvements ---- the purchase of bed frames, mattresses, sofas and other furnishings; a fundraising dinner and silent auction; a holiday of homes tour; volunteer training; an awards event; classroom equipment; and a community symphony concert.

Slater-Price's grants range from the $50,000 she gave to the YWCA of San Diego County for the construction of a shelter for victims of domestic abuse ("we do not fund shelters"?), to $2,800 for the San Diego County Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse, a single issue 501 (c) organization with a legislative agenda, for their annual scholarship luncheon.

There's little to quarrel about over the worthiness of most of the above projects. But Slater-Price's curious gift to a political advocacy group that promotes narrow business interests may give us insight into the unwillingness of supervisors to shine a light on their decisions.

Slater-Price and Greg Cox are the only ones to conspicuously advertise the grants on their Web sites. But the purposes they give for them offer no rationale for choosing one project over another. Making it up as you go along, as Weil and Culea have tried to do, isn't good enough.

Supervisors spent only $5.2 million of their $10 million budget for the grants in 2004-05. Last year $600,000 was left unspent . With vague selection criteria wrapped in a cloak of secrecy, suspicion remains that the taxes we pay for this worthy program are being used for political gain. And to that I say, "Bah, Humbug!"

Carlsbad resident Richard J. Riehl is a freelance columnist for the North County Times. Contact him at RiehlWorld2@yahoo.com.

Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Randy wrote on Dec 21, 2007 4:41 AM:Remember when the "slush funds" were only $1 million per supervisor? What a legalized scam!

Another thought wrote on Dec 21, 2007 10:29 AM:Aren't these funds received from the federal government under the Community Development Block Grant program? And don't federal regulations require local agencies dispensing CDBG funds to vote on each allocation, rather than allowing individual elected representatives to use them as patronage awards?

Another thought wrote on Dec 21, 2007 11:07 AM:Aren't these funds received from the federal government under the Community Development Block Grant program? And don't federal regulations require local agencies dispensing CDBG funds to vote on each allocation, rather than allowing individual elected representatives to use them as patronage awards?

GFN wrote on Dec 22, 2007 9:31 AM:The problem is homeless people are a rag-tag, disagreeable to look at group. No one really wants them around. However, pets are cute and it is easy to use them to get people to donate to that cause. Pets over People...what a group of leaders we have.

Complicated wrote on Dec 22, 2007 11:47 AM:This is a much more complicated matter than some are making it out to be. How much does the County provide in services to homeless people every year? Answer: About $40 million. Those community projects grants are not meant for operational costs. They are for capital projects, like building a new theatre or providing lunches for fire victims, or putting on a scholarship luncheon. By the way, Richard, if you've ever been to that scholarship luncheon you would know that Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse is doing wonderful things to protect small business owners from predatory lawsuits. Also, they give thousands of dollars in scholarships to high school students. Weren't you a college administrator at one time, Richard? Main point: The community projects funds are not meant for funding the day-to-day costs of homeless shelters. In regards to animal shelters, I don't believe any of the money spent on the animal shelter was used for operations. Bottom line is that this issue is deeper than what you see on the surface.

Reardon wrote on Dec 22, 2007 9:08 PM:If the people who support helping the homeless would simply take one of the homeless into their own home, into their own spare bedroom, the "homeless problem" would be solved by Monday morning. Hey, Richard...how many spare bedrooms do YOU have?

Truth Squad wrote on Dec 23, 2007 6:02 AM:It's not that complicated "Complicated." Luncheons are not "capital projects." The shelter was not asking for operational funding. Just stuff like mattresses and equipment, just like Horn funded for other projects. The problem isn't what they've funded, which have generally been worthy of funding. It's that the supervisors don't like to advertise them, making it easier to pick and choose the projects that will help them politically. Animal owners vote, the homeless are too busy looking for shelter.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos