2007 not a good year for water supplies

By: GIG CONAUGHTON - Staff Writer
Droughts, endangered fish usher in uncertainty | Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:58 PM PST

Nobody has worried this much about water in Southern California since 1991, when the 1987-92 drought prompted the state's last mandatory water rationing.

When 2007 began, Southern California water officials were pretty comfortable -- even though the Colorado River, which had long been the bedrock of imported water for this rain-starved region, was in its eighth year of drought.

After all, new reservoirs, dams and pipelines built after the 1987-92 drought were filled with years worth of stored water. And the State Water Project that delivers Northern California rainfall and snowmelt had been reliable ---- the new bedrock of Southern California's supply.

But then 2007 hit, and now everybody is worried.

Scientists believe that the eight-year Colorado River drought could last a lot longer than once thought.

The governor called a special session to talk about building more dams and reservoirs -- and came up empty.

The year's biggest water news, however, was created by a tiny fish.

First state, then federal, judges said the new "bedrock" State Water Project supplies must be cut to save an endangered fish, the delta smelt.

For now, water officials don't think water rationing will return in 2008 despite the pressures on the region's two main sources of imported water. Again, stores of water supplies will soften potential cutbacks.

But the effects of the current pressures will be felt.

Already, farmers and growers have been given mandatory 30 percent water cuts for 2008.

That will put some San Diego County growers and farmers out of business as they cut back their production by approximately one-third, water and farming officials have predicted.

The cuts are coming to growers who signed contracts to buy water at discounted rates in exchange for being the first to swallow cuts in dry times.

Water agencies across the state are amplifying calls for people to voluntarily cut water use by taking shorter showers, watering lawns and gardens less and other means.

Looking ahead, Southern Californians will have to wait to see if relief comes.

Will Mother Nature end the Colorado River's drought?

Can the state keep Northern California water flowing south through the fragile Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, the heart of the State Water Project?

"I think over the next several years, we're facing water supply uncertainty," said Gordon Hess, San Diego County Water Authority spokesman.

Tree rings

Water officials got their first unwelcome news in February.

The Colorado River's current eight-year drought is the longest in the 101 years of record-keeping, and water officials have been keeping their fingers crossed that it would soon end.

But in February, a panel of National Academy of Science scientists said tree ring studies showed the river had suffered decadelong droughts in previous centuries.

A University of Arizona study three months later said the river had endured a 60-year drought in the 1100s.

For decades, the Colorado River had been Southern California's biggest source of imported water.

The state Legislature actually formed Southern California's main water supplier -- the Metropolitan Water District that serves nearly 18 million people in six counties ---- in 1928 to build the Colorado River Aqueduct.

Metropolitan shifted most of its imported supply dependence to the State Water Project in 2003, when California signed a deal with other Western states and agreed to stop "overusing" the river.

As 2007 came to an end, California, Nevada and Arizona officials signed the Colorado River's first drought-allocation plan. The deal virtually guaranteed that Southern Californians would not see their Colorado River supplies cut through 2026.

But the academy's report continued to cast a shadow, saying that future droughts on the river could be longer and more severe because of global warming.

Meanwhile, the region's shift in reliance from the Colorado River to the State Water Project also ran into trouble.

Delta smelt

That trouble came in the form of the 2- to 3-inch Delta smelt.

In March, a superior court judge said the state must shut down the massive pumps in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta within 60 days to save the smelt, an endangered fish that was being killed in part by the pumps.

The delta is the heart of the State Water Project that delivers Sierra snowmelt and Northern California rainfall to the rest of the state.

The judge's order sent shock waves through California water agencies.

They were used to having to juggle droughts -- when the rains and snows that create imported water supplies dry up for short periods.

But suddenly, they were faced with the realization that the courts -- and environmental challenges -- could shut down water supplies even if rain and snow were plentiful.

The superior court judge eventually halted his shutdown order on appeal, but his ruling was an omen of further trouble.

In May, the state voluntarily shut down the delta pumps for 10 days to protect the smelt.

Then came the big blow.

In August, a federal court judged ruled that delta pumping would have to be cut in 2008.

Southern California got all of its water allocations this year. But Metropolitan and state water officials predicted that the region's 2008 Northern California supplies could be slashed by 30 percent.

Metropolitan General Manager Jeff Kightlinger said as 2007 ended that Southern California residents were going to have to find more ways to cut their water use ---- and stretch stored supplies ---- than ever before.

Regional water officials undoubtedly saw potential State Water Project trouble on the horizon, even if they did not see the delta smelt rulings coming.

The Colorado River, which has huge storage reservoirs, is still delivering full water supplies even after eight years of drought. But the State Water Project, with smaller reservoirs and less reliable snowpacks, has been notoriously fickle. It can be flush with water one year, and nearly empty the next. Water officials have also worried since Hurricane Katrina destroyed much of the Gulf Coast that hundreds of man-made levees in the delta could crumble and cut off Southern California's water supplies in an earthquake or other disaster.

Bright spots

There were bright spots in Southern California's water-supply saga in 2007. One of them occurred in San Diego County.

In November, California Coastal Commissioners granted conditional approval to a long-discussed plant that would turn seawater off Carlsbad's coast into "drought-proof" drinking water. The commission did so even though its own staff said there were still too many environmental questions about the plant to recommend approval.

The conditional approval could eventually allow the plant to churn out 50 million gallons of drinking water a day by 2010.

Meanwhile, agencies like Metropolitan and San Diego's Water Authority continued to try to work deals to buy water from farmers in Northern California ---- new supplies that could help offset shortages.

However, Southern California water officials said the region's water supplies would likely be threatened until the delta and State Water Project was fixed.

Metropolitan and San Diego officials said the only way to do that was to build a canal through or around the delta to separate fish and environmental worries from the state's water supplies.

The idea is not new. Statewide voters shot down a "peripheral canal" proposal in 1982.

Roger Patterson, Metropolitan assistant manager, said, "We're certainly in a period of uncertainty. But, we need to get a decision to make the fixes that need to be made in the delta, so that we know what the end point of this uncertainty is."

Contact staff writer Gig Conaughton at (760) 739-6696 or gconaughton@nctimes.com.

2007 -- A year of water uncertainty

Jan. 17, 2007: State water officials get unhappy news when the highly invasive Quagga mussel is discovered in Lake Mead, one of the main reservoirs of the Colorado River. The discovery doesn't affect water supplies, but could eventually cost ratepayers billions in annual cleanup costs.

Feb. 13, 2007: Southern California's main water supplier, the Metropolitan Water District, tentatively approves its largest rate increase in more than a decade ---- an action it cements in April. The agency blames the increase, which could amount to $1.50 a month for homeowners, on two factors: increasing electricity costs from pumping water; and increasing costs of treating water and making it drinkable.

Feb. 20, 2007: The National Academy of Sciences says tree-ring studies show Colorado River droughts have lasted longer than the current eight-year drought.

March 22, 2007: A Superior Court judge moves to shut down the massive pumps in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta to protect an endangered fish, the delta smelt. The shutdown would cut State Water Project deliveries that make up two-thirds of Southern California's imported water supplies.The judge halts the ruling on appeal. But it foreshadows more trouble.

March 28, 2007: State officials announce that the Sierra mountain snow packs that sustain much of the state's water supplies were at their lowest levels in a decade.

May 31, 2007: California's Department of Water Resources shuts down the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta pumps for 10 days to protect the smelt.

June 12, 2007: The Metropolitan Water District, Southern California's main water supplier, votes to spend $6.3 million on a marketing campaign asking people to cut their water use. The $6.3 million quadruples Metropolitan's previous "conservation" budget. San Diego County Water Authority officials say they plan to start a campaign to ask people to cut their use by 20 gallons a day.

June 20, 2007: An environmental group, the Natural Resources Defense Council, requests an injunction to shut down the State Water Project pumps again, shortly after the state ended its 10-day shutdown. A judge rejects the request.

June 25, 2007: Farmers across North County and their water suppliers said they are beginning to prepare for 30 percent water cuts that could come in 2008. One water official says the cuts could be the beginning of a "long-term shift" in North County's water resources.

July 10, 2007: Metropolitan board members vote to offer ratepayers financial incentives to buy synthetic turf.

Aug. 29, 2007: A new court ruling strikes at State Water Project supplies. This time, a federal court judge says that the Sacramento-San Joaquin pumps will have to be cut back in 2008 in order to protect the endangered Delta smelt. Metropolitan says the ruling could cut its Northern California imported supplies by 30 percent.

Sept. 4, 2007: Metropolitan says it is racing to create an emergency plan to divvy up water supplies among its customers -- including San Diego County ---- if water shortages hit in 2008.

Sept.11, 2007: Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger convenes a special legislative session to try to fix the state's water problems before they reach crisis level. The governor hopes to forge a ballot measure for voters to approve new dams and reservoirs. But he and legislators cannot agree on a plan.

Sept. 11, 2007: Metropolitan says any state action to "fix" the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta should build a $3 billion to $4 billion canal through, or around, the delta to separate water supplies and smelt. The idea is similar to "peripheral canal" that statewide voters rejected in 1982.

Sept. 17, 2007: The Association of California Water Agencies starts an eight-week, $6 million to $9 million TV ad campaign about the state's looming water crisis. Thirty-second spots feature pictures of trickling streams, vast reservoirs, parched soil, failed levees and flooded communities.

Sept. 27, 2007: San Diego County Water Authority votes to start talks to buy water from Butte County farmers.

Oct. 8, 2007: Metropolitan officially notifies farmers that they'll get 30 percent water cuts starting Jan. 1.

Nov. 8, 2007: Congress overrides President Bush's veto of a $23 billion water bill that contains $106 million to stabilize levees in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta. It marks first the override in Bush's seven-year-old presidency.

Nov. 20, 2007: Metropolitan moves to buy additional water from Central California farmers and Yuba County to offset water shortages in 2008.

Dec. 13, 2007: Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne signs Colorado River drought plan that would safeguard California's supplies through 2026.

Next
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Um wrote on Dec 28, 2007 12:46 AM:What about Riverside County, Gig?

politics and water do not mix wrote on Dec 28, 2007 1:28 AM:Agriculture (food, etc.) is very important in SD county and most of California. Must make certain that ag continues with enough water. Residents already living in Calif must have water for basic health reasons, and fire protection. Immediately stop all large developments (more than 24 dwellings) until there is proof that Calif has water available until 2030. Educate residents to be waterwise, i.e. drought tolerant plants, don't run water when brushing teeth, fix leaks, etc. Politicians must work for the taxpayers (govt of the people by the people for the people) and involve smart ethical professionals who know how to improve our water situation. Israel, a desert, grows and ships flowers around the world.

LKF wrote on Dec 28, 2007 7:02 AM:The delta smelt, aka: chum, food for bigger fish. Enviro-pagans and their ilk have managed to really screw the People of California. State & Federal Leadership is pathetic. Everyone seems to have forgotten that Humans are the ones who created the 'endangered list'. All this over a stupid fish that will survive anyhow. Without Humans, the list becomes a moot issue. If the water is not allowed to flow to Southern California, it will flow to the Sea. Stupid policies always seem to florish in California, land of fruits and nuts.

Step up to the plate... wrote on Dec 28, 2007 7:04 AM:We are in a drought. Officials are trying to give us as much water as they can obtain. We MUST change our ways. We must have a moratorium on new water meters. We have reached our limits and we are having our agricultural producers reduce their consumption already. We will be next. We need to reclaim and recirculate our grey water BEFORE someone forces us to the "Toilet-To-Tap" process. If we alter the way we use water and if we re-use a lot of it, then we will be conserving our own 30 percents voluntarily. Water Districts need to step up to the plate and stop issuing "Letters of Availability". The water is NOT AVAILABLE for more consumption.

Freelance wrote on Dec 28, 2007 7:41 AM:All new construction must have cisterns to capture water for toilets and irrigation. We must also use recycled water. In the end, SD County is, and will always be an area with little water available naturally that is also at the end of every water pipe line there is. We must find ways to have an economy that does not depend on population growth to be healthy. If we continue to relay on a pop growth to have a healthy economy, we are as good as dead from dehydration.

Karl wrote on Dec 28, 2007 8:21 AM:Freelance " All new construction must have cisterns to capture water for toilets and irrigation". This is called gray water and is a violation of Federal, state and local building codes. Codes will have to change before this happens. This kind of water also breeds ecoli, a decent filtering system will have to be involved.

Mike wrote on Dec 28, 2007 9:04 AM:Let's outlaw lawns. My lawn uses twice as much water as all my other landscape combined and I am tired of mowing. I really would love to let the lawn die. If everyone let their lawns die maybe we could save enough water for agriculture in San Diego and the smelt in the delta. But to get my wife and neighbors on board with the dead lawn look, I would need some kind of mandate from a water agency. I know I'm a wimp.

Reality wrote on Dec 28, 2007 9:15 AM:We have known about this water situation coming for years yet the politicians kept allowing houses to be built and all those wonderful ads on tv telling people to move here. All for the mighty dollar. Well now we are getting down to the nitty gritty lets see how well the mighty dollar tastes as we try to drink it down.

American Mike wrote on Dec 28, 2007 9:33 AM:Michael[-] wrote on Dec 28, 2007 7:25 AM:
" Does anyone know when Old Grove Road in Oceanside is going to open? "

Yes, saw the answer under another news topic.

GFN wrote on Dec 28, 2007 9:44 AM:"Politics and water", 1:28 am post is right on: "Immediately stop all large developments (more than 24 dwellings) until there is proof that Calif has water available until 2030."

GFN wrote on Dec 28, 2007 9:46 AM:"Step up to the plate", 7:04 am is right: "We MUST change our ways. We must have a moratorium on new water meters. We have reached our limits and we are having our agricultural producers reduce their consumption already. We will be next."

Frank wrote on Dec 28, 2007 10:35 AM:The most basic step to incentivize conservation is to make the bottom lines of water/sewerage bills 100% sensitive to the volume of water consumed. There should be no fixed, per-day charges; semi-flat-rate pricing is antithetical to conservation. This badly needed reform would also end the charging discrimination against small households, especially one-person households. I urge everyone reading this to contact their water-supply agency and demand an end to semi-flat-rate pricing.

Michael wrote on Dec 28, 2007 10:36 AM:American Mike, which news topic?

Census Bureau Projects Population of 303.1 Million wrote on Dec 28, 2007 10:56 AM:wrote on Dec 27, 2007 6:00 PM:
As our nation prepares to ring in the new year, the U.S. Census Bureau today projected the Jan. 1, 2008, population will be 303,146,284 -- up 2,842,103 or 0.9 percent from New Year’s Day 2007. In January, the United States is expected to register one birth every eight seconds and one death every 11 seconds. Meanwhile, net international migration is expected to add one person every 30 seconds. The result is an increase in the total U.S. population of one person every 13 seconds.

carl wrote on Dec 28, 2007 11:46 AM: cal- native, when I built my house here in Oceanside 18 years ago, I was required to have an environmental impact report before approval, which basically covered every detail from schools, roads, utilities (water), etc. Once approved, the house was completed, we were required to place ground covers on a couple slopes before the city would allow it to be occupied. Water restrictions went into effect that month, based on prior year’s usage, and since there was no record, our allotment was barely enough to flush the toilet and use showers. Seeking a review for a unit increase was a nightmare. The city told me to stop watering the slopes that they mandated to install and maintain!, which was costly and time consuming to install. Now in the evening, Mission is a 5 mile gridlock of cars in the evening, so what ever happened to those impact reports? And again the water is an issue,,,, what a surprise. So let’s put this in my simple perspective, I pay, and have paid for a service, and I expect my service to be 100%, and where you get the water, It’s not my problem, just like the officials that allowed 1,000s of homes to be built w/o any thought of where their water was coming from, much less what the impact was going to do to the areas. What officials are good at, is making their problems that they allowed, seem like they are “our” problems, and we are responsible for the consequences ". I answer is simple, several people in these postings hit it right on, your not blind but greedy. it only took you 14 years to figure out that a 2-lane highway(76) just isn't working- really sad- your over 10+ years behind the eight-ball.
idiots! and your answer is to raise the rates, seems like money talks

politics and water do not mix wrote on Dec 28, 2007 1:51 PM:
Do not raise the water rates. It is not the way to get water. Better planning is needed for water to 2030. 1. stop developments 2. grey water systems (re-cycle) 3. educate both the politicians and the public that water is precious and have ideas how each person can help 4. manufacture toilets that work on the first flush 5. waterwise plants 6. retro fit plumbing parts. Businesses today use taps that shut off automatically. A balance must be made to prevent erosion using plants and water; fires need water. Think carefully about fish ponds, swimming pools, water fountains, etc. Most important, how will the public get ethical professional support from our politicians; and a water plan that makes sense.

Concerned-1 wrote on Dec 28, 2007 3:28 PM:Actually, politics and water need to mix. The crux of the water issue has always been politics. Voters denied funding for the Peripheral Canal in the 1980s, which would have saved the Delta and solved our water issues. But politics got involved and easily swayed voters voted it down. Today, we have the environmental lobby using politics of the worst kind to gum up the works. There are solutions, many of which are pointed out in previous posts. But, until we solve the political issues (environuts, development and big ag to name a few), our pleas for sane improvements are falling on deaf ears.

Hippy KID wrote on Dec 28, 2007 4:11 PM:If I were mayor I would shut down every CARWASH in San Diego County as well as slap a fine to people watering their lawns. People can survive through life with a dirty automobile and brown grass growing in front of their homes. Lets shove asthetics aside here people for the well-being of our county

Gary in Murrieta wrote on Dec 28, 2007 4:26 PM:There was a story today in the Riverside Press Enterprise that said traffic will be congested on the very hevily used Pechanga Parkway, from Rainbow Canyon Road to Wolf Valley Road. Why the construction you ask? It seems that they are installing a 16 inch watermain pipe to irrigate a golf course being built at the Pechanga Resort & Casino. WHAT WATER SHORTAGE?????

Let's get on the bandwagon of conservation wrote on Dec 28, 2007 6:07 PM:Hopefully, there are many people out there that get it. We need to change our ways - and we need to do it sooner rather than later. The only problem is that IF the water departments do NOT put a moritorium on new water services, most of us just will not play ball because we know that the water departments are cheating. They are n the BUSINESS of selling water and new water services. That is how they make their money. We need to attend every Water District meeting and start requesting assistance in the new methods of conservation that have already been advised. We ned to inundate our senators and assembly with requests to change the laws regarding "grey water" a.k.a. "Purple Pipe" use. As far as ecoli, all that is needed is a drop of household bleach or chlorine once in a while to control any suggestion of it.

whaa?! wrote on Dec 28, 2007 7:16 PM:Why should I have to conserve water? I live in SoCal, therefore everything is perfect. I just ignore all the facts geographically and demographically, and just spend and use, spend and use without a thought.

Frank wrote on Jan 6, 2008 10:16 AM:The Federal, state, and local health department regulations only require water purveyors to provide enough water for health and safety. Everything else you get is gravy. Do you really need to shower every day for health and safety? Crackdowns are coming and the backlash will be interesting.

Bandwagon wrote on Jan 6, 2008 11:21 AM:Uh, there is a big difference between grey water and recycled water. Recycled water costs a lot more to treat than raw water. A drop of household bleach may disinfect water a little. I don't think you want to rely on "a drop of household bleach once in a while" to kill cryptosporidium. Another problem with treating used water are all the hormone therapy drugs it contains. There are no filtration processes that will remove them and be cost effective. Excessive chlorine will also result in more trihalomethanes. Most water disticts will be more than happy to assist customers with water conservation techniques.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos